sonicare
Hall of Fame
Please being forward your proof. Your assurances mean nothing to me as you are a confirmed schizophrenic.
What are the implications of Federer's slam count advantage if he meets Rafa at AO?
- Thread starter Bad_Knee
- Start date
Please being forward your proof. Your assurances mean nothing to me as you are a confirmed schizophrenic.
cc0509
Talk Tennis Guru
I agree, both the Nadal and Federer camps are making pathetic excuses. It does not matter what the circumstances were when a player wins a slam. A win is a win. There will be no excuses marked in the history books beside a win.
Clarky21
Banned
sonicare
Hall of Fame
Exactly and when people look at the history books, it will tell them that Nadal could never beat Rosol. There will be a asterik mark next to it due to an attempted head butt by Nadal to derail Rosol.
sonicare
Hall of Fame
Why resort to namecalling?
:lol:
schizophrenic is a trait not name calling. But what would you know. your sense of reality is suspect.
cc0509
Talk Tennis Guru
It is true that Nadal's loss to Rosol in the second round of Wimbledon is one of the worst losses ever by any tennis great in a slam but, at the same time, Nadal's 11 slam titles trump that one time only loss to Rosol.
Clarky21
Banned
Nah,it's namecalling if you use it in the manner in which you did,Freud. And my sense of reality is just fine,thank you.
sonicare
Hall of Fame
Ofcourse but those 2 are separate issues.
Why are you getting so defensive?
Clarky21
Banned
I know it was bad,but is it really this bad? When you factor in the circumstances,I don't really think it is.
Clarky21
Banned
I'm not. I'm actually pretty chill considering I am trying to converse with someone who is totally irrational when it comes to anything related to my favorite player.
tusharlovesrafa
Hall of Fame
LOL..For a good laugh in the morning!
sonicare
Hall of Fame
I'm not. I'm actually pretty chill considering I am trying to converse with someone who is totally irrational when it comes anything related to my favorite player.
Your emotional bias towards a player is making your delusions even worse
cc0509
Talk Tennis Guru
What circumstances? That he was "injured?" Please! He did not look injured to me and besides if a player takes to the court one assumes he is ready to play.
Yes, I think it is one of the worst losses ever for a great in slam history, especially considering Nadal's age. I have seen many sports writers say this is one of the worst losses ever, so I am not alone here.
Clarky21
Banned
Steve0904
Talk Tennis Guru
Relax man. I will insist no such things, and I will make no such threads. Nadal has proven himself. I was simply talking in the context of the thread. Fact is that if by some chance Nadal and Rosol play again, and if by some 0.00000001% chance Rosol wins then his first win cannot really be termed a fluke by definition, therefore by definition Nadal has to prove he can beat Rosol. And please don't break out the "healthy" excuse. That's a large part of the reason why I hate Nadal fans.
Last edited:
Clarky21
Banned
Nah,I don't see it the same way. It was bad,but I do believe Nadal was hampered in that match. I'm not making excuses for him,but I think it played a roll in his loss.
I also don't take the opinion of 99% of these sports writer's seriously.
Clarky21
Banned
Woman. I'm a chick. Lol.
Mugsol has to actually make it out of qualies first,and if he ever does and they play,I am confident that Nadal will beat him. We will just have to wait and see but Mugsol does not worry me in the slightest.
cc0509
Talk Tennis Guru
Things always play a role in a player's loss, but it does not matter, a loss is a loss, and that was a bad loss, one of the worst for any great in slam history. Fact. The other side of that however is that Nadal has 11 slams and those 11 slams will trump the one terrible 2nd round slam loss to the titan Rosol.
Steve0904
Talk Tennis Guru
Sorry about that.
I know, I'm also confident Nadal can beat him if they ever play again. Again, I was simply throwing out a different POV. I wasn't trying to discredit Nadal.
sonicare
Hall of Fame
are you on your period ? serious question
N
NadalAgassi
Guest
The biggest ever upset at Wimbledon in the early rounds was Becker losing to Doohan in 1987. Becker was the overwhelming favorite to win that Wimbledon. Nadal was only arguably the slight favorite to win this years Wimbledon ahead of Djokovic and Federer, and Sampras was way past his prime and not the favorite to win Wimbledon 2002, and all 3 lost to an equally weak opponent. On the other hand in some ways Sampras's loss was the worst since Bastl just played his usual average tennis to beat him, while Doohan and Rosol both played out of their minds and unbelievably well, even if also aided by poor play from Becker and Nadal.
cc0509
Talk Tennis Guru
I said Nadal's second round loss at W was "one of" the worst losses of a great in a slam ever. Stop making excuses for Nadal, it was a "bad" loss right on par with Becker's loss to Doohan no matter how you try and spin it.
Clarky21
Banned
Are you eva gonna grow up? Seriously sad...
Paullaconte1
Rookie
Agree! Federer can beat Nadal in a best of 5 only if Nadal has some problems like this year in Wimbledon
sonicare
Hall of Fame
yes. your turn.
Clarky21
Banned
Yeah,because I asked the original question. How about learning to read and comprehend before you open your mouth.
Oh,and nice sig. Too bad for you they lost in the first round of the playoffs.
Last edited:
Yes, but you forgot to point out that you did not reply to the original question, so I guess Stevie was right there wasn't he?
Clarky21
Banned
Nope,and what difference does it make? Man,this place is full of He-Man woman haters. It's quite scary how much woman hating there is on this forum.
Man, it is! Lol.
Well since "chicks" like you act this way it sorta gives us a lot of chance to bash you ya know.
tusharlovesrafa
Hall of Fame
OMG! you are crazy!! this is terrible..:shock:
R.Federer
Semi-Pro
loooooool full troll mode god i love you well done sir well done and clarky is taking the bait so gullable are people on this forum lol
Steve0904
Talk Tennis Guru
Just shut up FFS. I apologized. I didn't mean to start anything like this. She never asked the original question. soniccare is just being stupid.
Oops, yeah I meant to say sonicare, not you name. Just forgot who said what here. Accidentally calling someone a man is nothing to get worried about...
Clarky21
Banned
Nah,I didn't take the bait. I'm merely entertaining myself at Sonicare's expense. I know he is a troll. Always has been and always will be.
What's funny is how many He-Man woman hater's come out of the woodwork around here though. Seems like some of these dudes can't stand it when a woman speaks her mind.
R.Federer
Semi-Pro
oh ok glad u see sense and know what hes about but i dont think they are he men they just have different opnions than you i guess its only a forum though people like to think they are internet warriors but in reality would not dare have a confrontation face to face
sonicare
Hall of Fame
Stop being silly. I love women. Getting all my house work, washing, cooking,cleaning done for free. How can I not love women? They give me the free time I need to express my masculinity and be the stallion I am.
Another perfect example of taking the bait by reassuring all of TTW that you are not lol.
R.Federer
Semi-Pro
looool wow thats cold dawwg cooold
sonicare
Hall of Fame
LOL...its 4 am here and I cant sleep so any chance to hustle clarky, i will gladly take. seems like she logged off.
Apologies to anyone who might have been offended.
R.Federer
Semi-Pro
its fine you need to keep it up in the future the stallion part had me in stiches lool
Clarky21
Banned
Clarky21
Banned
Low brow woman hating posts are not funny in the slightest. And I also doubt that Sonicare is any kind of a "stallion" at all,if you catch my drift. :wink:
Steve0904
Talk Tennis Guru
Well if I was being serious I would say you were right, but since I'm not....
And yeah I caught your drift.
Prisoner of Birth
Banned
LOL, I think it's a perfectly valid question. Clarky's been really pissy the past couple of days. Even by "her" standards.
N
NadalAgassi
Guest
Wow you are an incredibly stupid human being. I was just making some general points, and nothing I said was in anyway excuse making or disputing Nadal's loss at Wimbledon this year was a bad loss. Everytime I read your posts I realize your intellect is only on par with someone like TMF, abmk, and 6-1, 6-3, 6-0, when originally I falsely gave you more credit than that. Even if you werent an over the top Federer addictive troll you would be impossible to have a reasonable discussion with.
Last edited by a moderator:
D
Deleted member 307496
Guest
Same could be said for you.
Similar threads
- Poll
