Fluffyballslayer
New User
Warm congrats to Federer for a truly remarkable win and it's wonderful that we continue to witness such a significant piece of tennis history in real time.
Federer now has 20 GS and 96 single titles. But does that elevate him to GOAT?
Laver: 11 GS single titles in Amateur & Open era. 9 GS doubles, 3 GS Mixed doubles, 5 Davis Cup and most importantly, the holy grail....twice: The Grand Slam in 1962 and 1969. Remember when Serena came oh so close a couple of years ago. Laver pulled it off not once, but twice.
He faced stiff competition at every turn: Roy Emerson (12 major titles), Ken Rosewall (8 majors), John Newcombe (7 majors) & Arthur Ashe (3 majors). Plus, there were the likes of Fred Stolle (2 majors) Tony Roche (1 major) & Cliff Drysdale. Laver's era was not a weak era. To the contrary, it was red hot. Plus he won 8 pro tour majors. While they cannot be officially counted, they still matter in context of the conversation, given his competition.
I would also argue that while the game is definitely a lot more physical in Federer's era, Laver & co did not have the drugs & medical advancement like today to very quickly combat fatigue & injury.
Federer is close to GOAT, but I think the title still belongs to Rocket.
Thoughts?
Federer now has 20 GS and 96 single titles. But does that elevate him to GOAT?
Laver: 11 GS single titles in Amateur & Open era. 9 GS doubles, 3 GS Mixed doubles, 5 Davis Cup and most importantly, the holy grail....twice: The Grand Slam in 1962 and 1969. Remember when Serena came oh so close a couple of years ago. Laver pulled it off not once, but twice.
He faced stiff competition at every turn: Roy Emerson (12 major titles), Ken Rosewall (8 majors), John Newcombe (7 majors) & Arthur Ashe (3 majors). Plus, there were the likes of Fred Stolle (2 majors) Tony Roche (1 major) & Cliff Drysdale. Laver's era was not a weak era. To the contrary, it was red hot. Plus he won 8 pro tour majors. While they cannot be officially counted, they still matter in context of the conversation, given his competition.
I would also argue that while the game is definitely a lot more physical in Federer's era, Laver & co did not have the drugs & medical advancement like today to very quickly combat fatigue & injury.
Federer is close to GOAT, but I think the title still belongs to Rocket.
Thoughts?