In Laver's era and even Borg's era there were many more grass court specialists. Until 77, 3 of the 4 majors were on grass, so there were many more grass court tournaments for players to develop a good grass court game. Since, 03 or so, Wimbledon seems to be a fast clay court tournament.Why is Nadal a far better player? You're right, gamewise they are about as similar as two guys from two totally different eras can get with their baseline dominating, topspinny goodness. Borg then of course won 5 Wimbledons where he was required to play a completely different style of game. Nadal essentially just kept winning doing near enough the same thing on all surfaces.
Some of yall probably already knew this
It's just interesting to see how stylistically similar they are despite playing in different decades and conditions
Nadal is still a far better player, but tennis as a whole wasn't as competitive as it is today during the era of Borg
Why is Nadal a far better player? You're right, gamewise they are about as similar as two guys from two totally different eras can get with their baseline dominating, topspinny goodness. Borg then of course won 5 Wimbledons where he was required to play a completely different style of game. Nadal essentially just kept winning doing near enough the same thing on all surfaces.
lololololololol manoldman.............can't be 1977 man, 50s 60s wooden rkt:?))) ppl started using alloy rkt in 70s:?)))......................
while Borg is fit, he's not even close to Nadal's fitness
hard to compare power I guess because of differences in racquet, but the level of power seems much lower too (even if we give them a wooden racket handicap)
the game is just better today, so good, that even the NextGen can't handle the quality of GOATGen
hmm interesting point, not sure
Laver was using both aluminum and wooden racquets in the 70s, depending on the speed of the court.lololololololol manoldman.............can't be 1977 man, 50s 60s wooden rkt:?))) ppl started using alloy rkt in 70s:?)))......................
Why do you think that Borg was not even close to Nadal's fitness? He was ahead of his time when it comes to fitness, and obviously had a lot of natural stamina.
The last time 3 of the 4 Slams were on grass was 1974. The US Open was on clay 1975, 1976 and 1977. But agree there were more grass court specialists back in the day, and Wimbledon now is a medium speed court since 2002In Laver's era and even Borg's era there were many more grass court specialists. Until 77, 3 of the 4 majors were on grass, so there were many more grass court tournaments for players to develop a good grass court game. Since, 03 or so, Wimbledon seems to be a fast clay court tournament.
Borg could've been the GOAT if he hadn't retired so early as he had a more decorated resume than any player by age 25 in history.Why is Nadal a far better player? You're right, gamewise they are about as similar as two guys from two totally different eras can get with their baseline dominating, topspinny goodness. Borg then of course won 5 Wimbledons where he was required to play a completely different style of game. Nadal essentially just kept winning doing near enough the same thing on all surfaces.
Borg got these?
on a serious note, it's just the way Borg moves, not as intense as Rafa
but then again, maybe he dont need to move that way, since the game is slower (despite being on faster courts)
Nadal isn't a far better player than Borg. Borg's achievement in winning six French titles and five Wimbledon titles by the age of 25 is insane.
He's definitely not a "far better" player than Borg but tbh he's a "far greater" player than BorgNadal isn't a far better player than Borg. Borg's achievement in winning six French titles and five Wimbledon titles by the age of 25 is insane.
He's definitely not a "far better" player than Borg but tbh he's a "far greater" player than Borg
Borg's an icon, but Rafa has more majors at one slam than Borg does in total. In terms of accomplishments and where they rank all time, Rafa definitely ranks higher than BjornNo, he's not.
Borg's an icon, but Rafa has more majors at one slam than Borg does in total. In terms of accomplishments and where they rank all time, Rafa definitely ranks higher than Bjorn
Laver was using both aluminum and wooden racquets in the 70s, depending on the speed of the court.
Changing from wooden to aluminum even during the very same match, if he was not feeling the ball.
That clip is from the WITC, 1977.