I actually said the first half of 2016 was "pretty good", not great, and this includes Wimbledon where Djokovic lost in the 3rd round. I thought the USO was weak where he lost in the final. AO was pretty good with Wawrinka/Raonic and Murray/Raonic, the clay season was entertaining and well played from Djokovic/Murray/Nadal, and Wimbledon was good, at least until the final. It was the second half when the level went way down for multiple reasons not even including Djokovic. Also, Djokovic won 2 Slams in 2018, one of them with a soft draw, so of course he has won Slams that could be considered weaker. The issue I have is when people try to say the only reason he is dominating is because the competition is weak while ignoring what happened in 2017 and first half of 2018, like no one remembers how dismal the opposition was, and ignoring what he did years before 2015.