I wonder what makes you think that.Yep.
Tbh, Nadal fans are the only ones who are gonna say no.
I wonder what makes you think that.
Stay up on the rise , Stay up on the rise...Brendon
I wonder what makes you think that.
Stay up on the rise , Stay up on the rise...
The debate would be between Djokovic and Federer in this scenario. Nadal would be the third wheel.
Why not?An easy "yes" for Djokovic fans, and it should be an easy "yes" for Fed fans.
I wouldn't take this deal if I were a Rafa fan
I’m surprised that I’m the first Federer fan now who votes NO.
20-20-20 would mean that Federer won’t win a Slam anymore, so surely I wouldn’t sign for that.
Maybe something like 22-22-22 would be better, but still I would reject it. Federer now leads the list and was recognized as GOAT for such a long time that I surely want him to stay on his throne.
But as I often said, if one or both of the other two will overtake him, I will congratulate them in all fairness and without searching for excuses.
I like his chances of ending up with more Slams than FedWhy not?
Because if you're leaving it up to how it'll fall naturally, most likely Federer will not stay at the top so most will be satisfied with him tying the other two since that's better than getting surpassed.I’m surprised that I’m the first Federer fan now who votes NO.
20-20-20 would mean that Federer won’t win a Slam anymore, so surely I wouldn’t sign for that.
Maybe something like 22-22-22 would be better, but still I would reject it. Federer now leads the list and was recognized as GOAT for such a long time that I surely want him to stay on his throne.
But as I often said, if one or both of the other two will overtake him, I will congratulate them in all fairness and without searching for excuses.
That would definitely put you in the minority among the Federer fanbase.I’m surprised that I’m the first Federer fan now who votes NO.
20-20-20 would mean that Federer won’t win a Slam anymore, so surely I wouldn’t sign for that.
Maybe something like 22-22-22 would be better, but still I would reject it. Federer now leads the list and was recognized as GOAT for such a long time that I surely want him to stay on his throne.
But as I often said, if one or both of the other two will overtake him, I will congratulate them in all fairness and without searching for excuses.
Well, I am a Nadal fan and I voted yes. I would like the three of them to be tied at 20 Slams.You serious?
Consider Federer and Novak Djokovic at 20 slams.
No we would keep arguing over who is the most elegant and humbleWell, I am a Nadal fan and I voted yes. I would like the three of them to be tied at 20 Slams.
The thing is, if a member of the Big 3 ends up winning the Grand Slam race, his fanbase will likely get so cocky dismissing the other two. In a hypothetical scenario where the three of them end up tied with the same number of Majors, I believe rival fanbases would be more polite with each other.
Djokovic wants to break Slam records. I'm surprised of some of his supporters not having faith he'll do it.
The fact that Nadal is going to get 21
During Djokovic's NCYGS run, he was taken to 5 against:Bc he barely won the last 2 and should have lost both really, that's about to catch up
Why do you think this? Nadal always has RG almost safe every year, and I don’t think this will stop soon. At least there are no signs, because AO just always was his weakest Slam and he only lost a very hard-fought match against Thiem there.Nadal is currently closer to Fed, but he won't win as many slams from here on out. I think Nadal has 2 or 3 left in him.
No this deal is the worst thing that could happen to Nadal because he's not benefiting anything. Not only does he only wins 1 slam from here on out which is already a bad deal because this upcoming RG is almost 80% in the bag and normally should at least be expected to win 1 or 2 more slams after this RG one, he'll also have the least claim GOAThood if they were all tied.Well, I am a Nadal fan and I voted yes. I would like the three of them to be tied at 20 Slams.
The thing is, if a member of the Big 3 ends up winning the Grand Slam race, his fanbase will likely get so cocky dismissing the other two. In a hypothetical scenario where the three of them end up tied with the same number of Majors, I believe rival fanbases would be more polite with each other.