silentkman
Hall of Fame
whats the final verdict on the Clash? will it be around in three years?
That's not true for everyone. Normal Clash can fit many people even good players. You can add just a bit of weight @12 to match it to TOUR spec, they are very close. I know some good players , heavy hitters, that play with lighter racquets.Normal Clash is too light but the Clash Tour is a great racquet.
That's not true for everyone. Normal Clash can fit many people even good players. You can add just a bit of weight @12 to match it to TOUR spec, they are very close. I know some good players , heavy hitters, that play with lighter racquets.
A 322SW racquet doesn't make you a pro versus a 312SW racquet. You are probably an open type player and I understand you are used to heavier racquets because you have good technique, fitness and anticipation but you can't generalize for all adult tennis players. Specs between both models are pretty close and based on TennisW, the twistweight is even higher on the regular model than the TOUR.
DisagreeA blob of lead at 12 doesn't bring it to Tour spec at all. Standard racquet is simply too light weight unless you're a small woman or a junior.
Sorry, you're wrong. Compared to the Clash 100, the Tour has a higher swing weight and an essentially identical Twist Weight. Add a few grams at 12 to bring up the SW to the desired spec (and balance at the handle if you want to retain the very head-light balance) and you effectively have a Clash Tour--likely with much better spec accuracy given Wilson's crappy quality control (i.e. the racquet you *want* vs the random racquet you end up with). This is exactly what I did:A blob of lead at 12 doesn't bring it to Tour spec at all. Standard racquet is simply too light weight unless you're a small woman or a junior.
Sorry, you're wrong. Compared to the Clash 100, the Tour has a higher swing weight and an essentially identical Twist Weight. Add a few grams at 12 to bring up the SW to the desired spec (and balance at the handle if you want to retain the very head-light balance) and you effectively have a Clash Tour--likely with much better spec accuracy given Wilson's crappy quality control (i.e. the racquet you *want* vs the random racquet you end up with). This is exactly what I did:
Static weight: 329g
Balance: 12.63 (7 pts HL)
Swing weight: 334
Completely agree. The Clash 98 is like a Blade v7 that I can actually wield. Great feel, tremendous spin, and very solid. People miss the fact that it's not just a slightly smaller head size. It's a very different frame with higher swingweight despite a smaller head.the 98 with a little weight is great. got a good deal getting it used off an auction site
I'm scared if I'll not like themBuy 2 and ask for service...I had a std that felt as heavy as the tour...balance wise
Clash 98 plays with a higher swingweight than the Clash 100 and almost plays like a more maneuverable Blade but with less plow (because the Blade has a ridiculous amount of that!).I see that between Clash 100, Clash 100 Tour nad Clash 98 most people prefer Clash 98. I imagine that it has more control that Clash 98 but is there any other difference?
Thanks!
Assuming that you've already demoed it's always better to buy them at the same time from the same batch for more accuracy. Try googling this "Wilson clash quality control". There's a youtube video of a guy measuring 10 clashes static weight; they're quite close. I would also use the matching service.I' m about to order Clash 100.
Should I order just one, or two and racquet matching service? I'm scared to order one because of bad Wilson quality. Any advice?
Thanks!
Assuming that you've already demoed it's always better to buy them at the same time from the same batch for more accuracy. Try googling this "Wilson clash quality control". There's a youtube video of a guy measuring 10 clashes static weight; they're quite close. I would also use the matching service.
My advice would be to first get healthy and then go through the demo process again. This way you’ll know for sure if a particular frame is right for you. It definitely sucks to be injured!I have ordered Prince Textreme Tour 310g and Wilson Clah 100 for demo. I have only played with it for few minutes because I have twisted my ankle.
I have enjoyed it for those few minutes but I'm not sure thats enough.
So right now I don't know what to do? I'm scared to order one because of Wilson control. But what if I order 2 and turn's out I don't like them?
Ufffffff
Yes, I was so angry grrrr. So I had to return the racquets and didn't had a chance to test the Clash. I decided the Textreme Tour 310g is not for me.My advice would be to first get healthy and then go through the demo process again. This way you’ll know for sure if a particular frame is right for you. It definitely sucks to be injured!
-how about a 100" clash.PRO with 18/20 pattern ??!! wouldn't that be something
Yes, I was so angry grrrr. So I had to return the racquets and didn't had a chance to test the Clash. I decided the Textreme Tour 310g is not for me.
The thing is Clash racquets are now on discount on TWE and I can get 15€ back If I buy the racquet now.
Usually it is 180€, and now I can get it for 135€
To me the clash is a love/hate racket...
For that kind of money you could get an Angell racquet that is always true to spec.
The Clash Tour was the worst racquet I played last year, totally erratic, no control, did not like the feeling at all, but hey that is just my opinion.
After playing with Clash,every other tweener feels like baseball bat.Normal Clash is too light but the Clash Tour is a great racquet. Best tweener frame out there that doesn't destroy your arm.
I sure would be interested! I play a Dunlop m3.0 (98) and a Head Graph Radical S (102)... and bought a Clash Tour. Have had it restrung tighter twice... tested today, it plays better now.... but still, sometimes erratic. I have trouble hitting the court when flattening my forehand and letting it rip. The m3.0 and the S are both 16x19, but tighter spacing in the sweetspot... maybe that's the reason?
I have played with TC100 63RA for many hours. Unfortunately it bothers my shoulder so I had to gave up on it. Such a shame because it really is fantastic performance racquet!
After playing with Clash,every other tweener feels like baseball bat.
I think it really depends on what you're hitting against. If you're trying to return guys bombing serves and huge forehands, the lite racquets don't cut it. But if you're playing rec tennis and are 3.5-4.0 it's not a total deal breaker at all.You lose strength / muscle mass playing with these 'lite' racquets. The Tour is definitely the better stick.
AgreeYou lose strength / muscle mass playing with these 'lite' racquets. The Tour is definitely the better stick.
It is not low powered, plenty of power. You can finish point with no problem.Is it jarring to your shoulder on off center hits? Or is kind of low powered and you have to swing with alot of racquet head speed to generate any power?
It is not low powered, plenty of power. You can finish point with no problem.
The SW is little high for me (300 unstrung) and it is to firm for me.
Great frame but I had to gave up on it. So now I'm looking for my baseline play, but one that is arm friendlyI can see the firmness being an issue and a 330 SW is a pretty hefty frame.
Great frame but I had to gave up on it. So now I'm looking for my baseline play, but one that is arm friendly
Have you tried Clash 100?
Whats so special about it? Can you compare it to Clash 100?Clash 98 closest racket to perfect
-what strings have you tried (gauge and type)?
-what tensions?
Do it! Its a great racquet. I'd look for one from the tw classifieds, if on fence. Easy to sell it back too.So...should I buy Clash 100 or not?
Aaaaaa