testingHas anyone got confirmation? I have heard that Murray is switching to XL rackets now: PT57A-2 XL 16/19
testing
Source?testing
He knowsSource?
Oh I know dr325i has all the sources, I just want to know who it isHe knows
anyway, I think it makes sense for Sir ABM go with the XL, with his current physical conditioning. It should be beneficial.
I disagree. I have Novaks personal that I set to my spec and is 27.1” (0.1” extended) and is noticeable vs non extended same spec same racket (PT346.1).Anyone know what he's testing? .25" or .5"? .25' is barely noticeable IMO. He could make the change very easily.
I honestly believe he works at/for Head, and has contacts with the pro stock rooms for Head. Either that or he works for one of the slams and gets access to all the racquets of the pro’s.Oh I know dr325i has all the sources, I just want to know who it is
He is part of one great austrian tennis/ski Company.I honestly believe he works at/for Head, and has contacts with the pro stock rooms for Head. Either that or he works for one of the slams and gets access to all the racquets of the pro’s.
This is the worst shameless self promoting. Murray never switched to the racquet you re selling. Sorry.
Dumdum, did you even read the title of the thread???This is the worst shameless self promoting. Murray never switched to the racquet you re selling. Sorry.
This is the worst shameless self promoting. Murray never switched to the racquet you re selling. Sorry.
I disagree. I have Novaks personal that I set to my spec and is 27.1” (0.1” extended) and is noticeable vs non extended same spec same racket (PT346.1).
Murray is testing a few different lengths which is a normal procedure when thinking about changing the specs
1) Who said AM made a switchall I said was Andy Murray has not made the switch. It is a fact and I said it as it is. How is that bashing head ? Why do you have to be so defensive about it ? I even bought a pt 2.0 from a TW to pair with my MIA 280. I can differentiate good stock from garbage and if that offends you you need to seek help.
Gees man.. I spilled the drink and luckily my iPhone is sort of liquid proof.... hahahahahahi Alex H21.5 +/- 7, what did you forget in this thread?
or is it just another occasion to bash Head?
wanna finally tell us what happened, were you fired from Head? or something else?
which part of the “ing” in the thread title you did not understand?all I said was Andy Murray has not made the switch. It is a fact and I said it as it is. How is that bashing head ? Why do you have to be so defensive about it ? I even bought a pt 2.0 from a TW to pair with my MIA 280. I can differentiate good stock from garbage and if that offends you you need to seek help.
Didn't Djokovic change from 26.8 to 27.1 as well? .3 would certainly be noticeable.I disagree. I have Novaks personal that I set to my spec and is 27.1” (0.1” extended) and is noticeable vs non extended same spec same racket (PT346.1).
Murray is testing a few different lengths which is a normal procedure when thinking about changing the specs
1) Who said AM made a switch
2) Title clearly says PT57A2 with different length which is completely true!
"This is the worst shameless self promoting. Murray never switched to the racquet you re selling. Sorry."
How is this stupid statement:
1) anything to do with what the thread is about
2) not bashing Head???
@TW Staff -- you guys really need to contain this behavior from this particular poster
Censorship is all you strive for and it is you who need to be contained. People like you are not the norm in this industry and I am actually gratified to see Wilson, Babolat and Yonex surpassing head and the margin is getting larger and larger. You really need to learn how to read basic texts and face constructive feedback on products made by head, who until this very day, does not have a true signature line. where your focus, dr325, is to misguide consumers to maintain your superiority on some head pro stocks never accessible by the public. is that my fault ? Are you now forcing people to admit Murray is using the new radical ?
You made numerous false statement but demanded respect from newer members when you were called out. This is not the first time dr325 has asked @TW Staffto terminate my access to this site.
Censorship is all you strive for and it is you who need to be contained. People like you are not the norm in this industry and I am actually gratified to see Wilson, Babolat and Yonex surpassing head and the margin is getting larger and larger. You really need to learn how to read basic texts and face constructive feedback on products made by head, who until this very day, does not have a true signature line. where your focus, dr325, is to misguide consumers to maintain your superiority on some head pro stocks never accessible by the public. is that my fault ? Are you now forcing people to admit Murray is using the new radical ?
I had an exchange with you sometime ago ,in good faith, I was willing to buy Djokovic 346 radical and Murray’ s PT 57 from retail stores or TW. But that is likely to never happen. Should I be silenced for simply talking facts ?
You made numerous false statement but demanded respect from newer members when you were called out. This is not the first time dr325 has asked @TW Staffto terminate my access to this site.
"face constructive feedback"
you are probably the last person on Earth to give constructive feedback.
so many posters already asked you: what happened between you and Head?
it's so obvious that you hate this particular company, that sorry bro, you can't hide behind "constructive feedback"
I don't have any ties neither to Head, nor to Wilson nor to Babolat.
I can give constructive feedback to Babolat for example, as I played with Babolat rackets and moved to Head.
And you will see plenty of it across my posts in this forum section.
But I don't bash Babolat or Wilson on every possible occasion.
Just like I don't say that Head has some magical frames.
If there is someone who posted numerous fakes, it is you buddy.
with your statements that Novak started to play with Wilson for example and then moved to Head.
or your ridiculous implies that the Radical line was developed for Novak to change from Wilson to Head.
common buddy, time to move on. It doesn't matter what happened between you and Head. We all know that you hate Head.
just focus on praising Wilson, no need to spit so much salt about Head.
So is Delpo I believe.This thread's poasts are making me confuse. So what is Andy Murray selling? I've always been very complimenting of his mother; do I get a discount?
Yeah to some people constructive criticism is equatable to outright calling stuff he hasn't played garbage and hating on everything... it'd be kinda excusable if the guy was 14 but based on the racquets he uses I doubt he is..."face constructive feedback"
you are probably the last person on Earth to give constructive feedback.
so many posters already asked you: what happened between you and Head?
it's so obvious that you hate this particular company, that sorry bro, you can't hide behind "constructive feedback"
I don't have any ties neither to Head, nor to Wilson nor to Babolat.
I can give constructive feedback to Babolat for example, as I played with Babolat rackets and moved to Head.
And you will see plenty of it across my posts in this forum section.
But I don't bash Babolat or Wilson on every possible occasion.
Just like I don't say that Head has some magical frames.
If there is someone who posted numerous fakes, it is you buddy.
with your statements that Novak started to play with Wilson for example and then moved to Head.
or your ridiculous implies that the Radical line was developed for Novak to change from Wilson to Head.
common buddy, time to move on. It doesn't matter what happened between you and Head. We all know that you hate Head.
just focus on praising Wilson, no need to spit so much salt about Head.
So is Delpo I believe.
This is the worst shameless self promoting. Murray never switched to the racquet you re selling. Sorry.
I disagree. I have Novaks personal that I set to my spec and is 27.1” (0.1” extended) and is noticeable vs non extended same spec same racket (PT346.1).
Murray is testing a few different lengths which is a normal procedure when thinking about changing the specs
I disagree. I have Novaks personal that I set to my spec and is 27.1” (0.1” extended) and is noticeable vs non extended same spec same racket (PT346.1).
Murray is testing a few different lengths which is a normal procedure when thinking about changing the specs
He is testing various lengths in the off seasonmany update on Murray and his racquet length?
Do you know which length he used against Evans in BoB?He is testing various lengths in the off season
Don't know. Multiple sticks with different lengths were sent to him so he could have used any combo...Do you know which length he used against Evans in BoB?
Do you know which length he used against Evans in BoB?
Ummm, it might be just me but aren't you overthinking what the title implies? If you ask me the OP implied that Murray is possibly switching to frame which is 10mm longer then the standard so circa 27.4 inches.Racquets more than 29" long are illegal. If XL is 27.5" long, it would be legal. 10 mm is 0.4", so if true, he would be using ~28" long frame. He must b channeling Chang.
Ummm, it might be just me but aren't you overthinking what the title implies? If you ask me the OP implied that Murray is possibly switching to frame which is 10mm longer then the standard so circa 27.4 inches.
Besides our resident Head insider already stated he is testing various lengths and when Sir Murray decides to settle on one, @dr325i will fill us in.
My speculation, based on watching the highlight clip, is that he is indeed using an XL frame, but probably something in between 27.4 and 27. I say this from noticing that his angled crosscourt 2hb looked more confident than ever with sharper angle, while he played safer than usual on the fh. His slice bh was still looking solid as a go-to option, which is why I don’t think it’s a full 27.4. His sw still looks huge in the 380 range, judging by how easily he was maintaining control of the rallies without swinging nearly as hard as Evans. I look forward to finding out the details.Don't know. Multiple sticks with different lengths were sent to him so he could have used any combo...
My speculation, based on watching the highlight clip, is that he is indeed using an XL frame, but probably something in between 27.4 and 27. I say this from noticing that his angled crosscourt 2hb looked more confident than ever with sharper angle, while he played safer than usual on the fh. His slice bh was still looking solid as a go-to option, which is why I don’t think it’s a full 27.4. His sw still looks huge in the 380 range, judging by how easily he was maintaining control of the rallies without swinging nearly as hard as Evans. I look forward to finding out the details.
I hope those show up on Prostocktennis.com soonDon't know. Multiple sticks with different lengths were sent to him so he could have used any combo...
yeah, for $4500 eachI hope those show up on Prostocktennis.com soon