More Impressive for a Legacy: NCYGS or Olympic Singles Gold?

More impressive achievement?

  • Non Calendar Year Grand Slam

    Votes: 90 85.7%
  • Olympic Gold in Singles

    Votes: 17 16.2%

  • Total voters
    105

goldengate14

Professional
This is going to come off as rude but...that's why you are not a pro. And I can bet my last dollar that if your boy Zverev ever does win a NCYGS, he will consider it a bigger achievement than an Olympic medal.

You and other Fedal fans (I mean other than the ones who talk sense like RaulRamirez) are just fortunate the Fedal obsessed media never talked up Djokovic's NCYGS the way they did Serena's. Otherwise this wouldn't even be a topic of debate. And it's not as if Djokovic isn't, you know, tied with Fedal for most slams, not as if he isn't the only one of the three who has won every major twice. I could go on. Rafaboy's lone singles gold cannot top a streak of four majors in a row.
Your post is fanboyism not based on reality. Olympic gold dwarfs a nycgs. To blame the media is hilarious but not surprisig
 

goldengate14

Professional
Interesting to look at this from the point of view of "legacy" which was in the original question.

Winning four-in-a-row is undoubtedly much harder and the greater achievement.

But specifically from a legacy point-of-view when you check the stats on the ATP website and Wikipedia it doesn't really show up whereas an Olympic Gold would do. So it may be in twenty years time it would have been better not to have that gap.

Until we know the final stats we can't really be sure.
Exactly my point. The thread was about a legacy
 

Dolgopolov85

G.O.A.T.
Your post is fanboyism not based on reality. Olympic gold dwarfs a nycgs. To blame the media is hilarious but not surprisig
And this is the part where I tell you I am a Federer fan and have been since 2003, when Djokovic was just about turning pro. But unlike you and other hilarious glory hunters, I don't twist and disfigure my standards to somehow defend 'my guy'. That's complete bollocks. Agassi's career slam was a heck of a deal in the 90s and we talked about it way more than his lame Gold Medal in a weak-ass field and you're telling me Djokovic's NCYGS doesn't matter? How disingenuous can you possibly get? Yes, Olympic Gold means a lot...in track and field, gymnastics, swimming and a host of other sports that are nowhere as commercialized as tennis. But not in tennis...olympic medals simply don't matter as much in tennis, never have.
 

ttwreader

Hall of Fame
Technically, tennis at the Olympics is like a masters 1000 regarding the draw, format. Someone should remind me how many players have won all the masters 1000 without missing one (and a masters 1000 happens every year, not one in 4 years as the Olympics)? So missing one of these tournaments should be a big deal?

It's just an amateur tournament without prize money, ranking point, just the honor one would receive when doing something for his/her country.
 

NAS

Hall of Fame
Technically, tennis at the Olympics is like a masters 1000 regarding the draw, format. Someone should remind me how many players have won all the masters 1000 without missing one (and a masters 1000 happens every year, not one in 4 years as the Olympics)? So missing one of these tournaments should be a big deal?

It's just an amateur tournament without prize money, ranking point, just the honor one would receive when doing something for his/her country.
Depends on the edition, for me 2008, 2012 were equivalent to yec, 2016 equivalent to master.
2000, 2004, 2021 equivalent to atp 500 and rest edition equivalent to atp 250
 

Sunny014

Legend
Olympics is designed to test the physical limits of players and only the best wins there, thats how tough it is. Winning an Olmpics Gold in Athletics/Wrestling/Swimming etc etc is tougher than winning the asian games/world athletics meet which is tougher than the local competitons happening around.

Now when it comes to tennis then Slams already are the pinnacle, this is what you fellows who talk of Olympics need to understand, reason why it has no value is because tennis has no business being in the olympics, if Tennis had to be there then Olympics should have been a best of 7 sets tournament played over many rounds and also having at least 4000 points in the calender year. Then winning Olympics would have been prestigious.

As of now it is worthless.... Nadal and Murray's gold medals have no value !
 

NAS

Hall of Fame
Olympics is designed to test the physical limits of players and only the best wins there, thats how tough it is. Winning an Olmpics Gold in Athletics/Wrestling/Swimming etc etc is tougher than winning the asian games/world athletics meet which is tougher than the local competitons happening around.

Now when it comes to tennis then Slams already are the pinnacle, this is what you fellows who talk of Olympics need to understand, reason why it has no value is because tennis has no business being in the olympics, if Tennis had to be there then Olympics should have been a best of 7 sets tournament played over many rounds and also having at least 4000 points in the calender year. Then winning Olympics would have been prestigious.

As of now it is worthless.... Nadal and Murray's gold medals have no value !
Rafa and Murray gold medal came from best edition of Olympics tennis, they will always be held in higher regards.
I only love these two edition of Olympic tennis
 

Sunny014

Legend
Rafa and Murray gold medal came from best edition of Olympics tennis, they will always be held in higher regards.
I only love these two edition of Olympic tennis


Athletes make events special, events don't make athletes special.

Just because Usain Bolt and Michael Phelps lit the Olympics on fire doesn't mean Nadal's gold medal has any relevance in his GOAT Race vs Novak as it doesn't signify any special feat that cannot be achieved.

So I am sorry to say that Olympics has no value as far as tennis goes, olympics is known for other events where boundaries of human bodies are tested and that is why those performance are special.
 

Sunny014

Legend
No. I refuse to be a salty Djokovic fanboy who is trying to devalue the Olympic Gold due to Djokovic's failure to win it.

Djokovic winning Olympics or not winning is his problem, if he craves for something which is not useful then thats his problem.

Olympics has been about testing boundaries of athleticism, otherwise even cheerleading at the olympics can be considered special day of your life, but that doesn't mean it should be considered special

Tennis at the olympics is just timepaas, not of any significance in the GOAT race even 1%, its points are 0 in the calendar year, that is its worth !!
 
D

Deleted member 748597

Guest
Djokovic winning Olympics or not winning is his problem, if he craves for something which is not useful then thats his problem.

Olympics has been about testing boundaries of athleticism, otherwise even cheerleading at the olympics can be considered special day of your life, but that doesn't mean it should be considered special

Tennis at the olympics is just timepaas, not of any significance in the GOAT race even 1%, its points are 0 in the calendar year, that is its worth !!
Incorrect analysis. The Olympics is bigger than the game of tennis itself and therefore has to be much bigger than Slams. The so-called GOAT candidate constantly failing to win it while also crying and raging suggests that he cannot be the GOAT candidate at all. Djokovic has been failing when it really mattered for too long.
 

mike danny

Bionic Poster
Incorrect analysis. The Olympics is bigger than the game of tennis itself and therefore has to be much bigger than Slams. The so-called GOAT candidate constantly failing to win it while also crying and raging suggests that he cannot be the GOAT candidate at all. Djokovic has been failing when it really mattered for too long.
Very troublesome as a Djokovic fan.
 

Sunny014

Legend
Incorrect analysis. The Olympics is bigger than the game of tennis itself and therefore has to be much bigger than Slams. The so-called GOAT candidate constantly failing to win it while also crying and raging suggests that he cannot be the GOAT candidate at all. Djokovic has been failing when it really mattered for too long.

thats an argument like that Beggarserve :D
 
Last edited:

Sunny014

Legend
Honestly, I laughed so much while writing that post.

Yes, the guys who wanna glorify olympics Gold medals are like that. Mostly Nadal fans and Murray fans do that, we all know why.

Honestly even if Federer had won gold in olympics I dont think I would have used that as a big highlight, that is just another best of 3, not of any value because the event is that shabby.

Plus A big mistake lies with Novak as well, I donno why he is obsessed with Olympics, so much that he cries and creates a ruckus, maybe he is too patriotic, he crying and all has made it a butt of jokes for Nadal fans like clayqueen and many others to exploit that ......
 

Sunny014

Legend
Everything that is yellow is not Gold, it can be sh*t as well.

OIympics is known for Bolt and Phelps breaking world records and raising the bar for human race, thats why it is so prestigious

However Sascha wininng some medal there or Murray winning something raises nothing, it is a waste of time, a petty best of 3 tourney :D
 

Tony48

Legend
Well ill take the views of a top.professional over social media users

No, you take the views of select top professionals. What about the views of the players who skipped the Olympics because they don’t view it as important at all? I’m guessing they don’t count for whatever reason you’ll come up with.
 

goldengate14

Professional
No, you take the views of select top professionals. What about the views of the players who skipped the Olympics because they don’t view it as important at all? I’m guessing they don’t count for whatever reason you’ll come up with.
Who skipped it by saying it was not important?
i do.not think tennis should be in the Olympics. But it is. And its a big deal for players. No prize money. No points. If it was not important why on earth would players interrupt their schedules to play it?
 

octobrina10

Talk Tennis Guru
Btw Borg Channel Slams for me are massive and match anything the Big 3 did. The difference between clay and grass back then was enormous.
When ee discuss legacies Borg arguably had the greatest legacy to the game of all. He changed the sport in many ways.
Rafa has accomplished the Channel Slam twice.
 

pedro94

Semi-Pro
What the heck is the NCYGS? Another trivial stats to boost Nole.

Either you have a Calendar Grand Slam or you don't.

Imagine a scenario where your beloved Roger is the first man in the open era since 1969 to win 4 slams in a row.. Would it be just "another trivial stat to boost Fed" in your eyes? :unsure:
 

timnz

Legend
See title. Which is more of an impressive achievement: NCYGS (4 straight majors in a row in 2 calendar years) or an Olympic Gold in Singles.

I like to look at it as which is more historically relevant of an achievement. Olympic Gold in Singles or a NCYGS?

Men’s OE NCYGS:
Laver
Djokovic

Women’s OE NCYGS:
Graf
Serena (also Olympic Gold holders each)
Navratilova (who won 6 in a row)
Court
Not even in the same galaxy. Nadal beat just 1 player in the top 8 to win Olympic gold in 2008. An achievement to be sure. But not even approaching winning 1 slam in tennis achievement terms, let alone 4 slams in a row. And I mean no disrespect to Rafa in saying that.
 
Top