RaulRamirez
Legend
Yes, my wife and I thank you.Does having a hotter wife counts in the debate ?
Although, as a pretty good high school player and mediocre men's player, I modestly remove myself from such consideration.
Yes, my wife and I thank you.Does having a hotter wife counts in the debate ?
Your post is fanboyism not based on reality. Olympic gold dwarfs a nycgs. To blame the media is hilarious but not surprisigThis is going to come off as rude but...that's why you are not a pro. And I can bet my last dollar that if your boy Zverev ever does win a NCYGS, he will consider it a bigger achievement than an Olympic medal.
You and other Fedal fans (I mean other than the ones who talk sense like RaulRamirez) are just fortunate the Fedal obsessed media never talked up Djokovic's NCYGS the way they did Serena's. Otherwise this wouldn't even be a topic of debate. And it's not as if Djokovic isn't, you know, tied with Fedal for most slams, not as if he isn't the only one of the three who has won every major twice. I could go on. Rafaboy's lone singles gold cannot top a streak of four majors in a row.
Exactly my point. The thread was about a legacyInteresting to look at this from the point of view of "legacy" which was in the original question.
Winning four-in-a-row is undoubtedly much harder and the greater achievement.
But specifically from a legacy point-of-view when you check the stats on the ATP website and Wikipedia it doesn't really show up whereas an Olympic Gold would do. So it may be in twenty years time it would have been better not to have that gap.
Until we know the final stats we can't really be sure.
And this is the part where I tell you I am a Federer fan and have been since 2003, when Djokovic was just about turning pro. But unlike you and other hilarious glory hunters, I don't twist and disfigure my standards to somehow defend 'my guy'. That's complete bollocks. Agassi's career slam was a heck of a deal in the 90s and we talked about it way more than his lame Gold Medal in a weak-ass field and you're telling me Djokovic's NCYGS doesn't matter? How disingenuous can you possibly get? Yes, Olympic Gold means a lot...in track and field, gymnastics, swimming and a host of other sports that are nowhere as commercialized as tennis. But not in tennis...olympic medals simply don't matter as much in tennis, never have.Your post is fanboyism not based on reality. Olympic gold dwarfs a nycgs. To blame the media is hilarious but not surprisig
Murray goatOlympic gold in singles is worth at least 8 Slams.
Depends on the edition, for me 2008, 2012 were equivalent to yec, 2016 equivalent to master.Technically, tennis at the Olympics is like a masters 1000 regarding the draw, format. Someone should remind me how many players have won all the masters 1000 without missing one (and a masters 1000 happens every year, not one in 4 years as the Olympics)? So missing one of these tournaments should be a big deal?
It's just an amateur tournament without prize money, ranking point, just the honor one would receive when doing something for his/her country.
Zverev just trying to make himself feel relevant to the Big 3 and recent slam winners Thiem and Medvedev.Zverev said Olympics was biggest title he has ever won. I think he has won more than 250 events?
Rafa and Murray gold medal came from best edition of Olympics tennis, they will always be held in higher regards.Olympics is designed to test the physical limits of players and only the best wins there, thats how tough it is. Winning an Olmpics Gold in Athletics/Wrestling/Swimming etc etc is tougher than winning the asian games/world athletics meet which is tougher than the local competitons happening around.
Now when it comes to tennis then Slams already are the pinnacle, this is what you fellows who talk of Olympics need to understand, reason why it has no value is because tennis has no business being in the olympics, if Tennis had to be there then Olympics should have been a best of 7 sets tournament played over many rounds and also having at least 4000 points in the calender year. Then winning Olympics would have been prestigious.
As of now it is worthless.... Nadal and Murray's gold medals have no value !
Rafa and Murray gold medal came from best edition of Olympics tennis, they will always be held in higher regards.
I only love these two edition of Olympic tennis
No. I refuse to be a salty Djokovic fanboy who is trying to devalue the Olympic Gold due to Djokovic's failure to win it.OSG is irrelevant in greatness debates lol.
Thiem not really same generation thoughZverev just trying to make himself feel relevant to the Big 3 and recent slam winners Thiem and Medvedev.
"recent slam winners"Thiem not really same generation though
No. I refuse to be a salty Djokovic fanboy who is trying to devalue the Olympic Gold due to Djokovic's failure to win it.
Murray would disagreeA single slam is more impressive than an Olympic gold.
Incorrect analysis. The Olympics is bigger than the game of tennis itself and therefore has to be much bigger than Slams. The so-called GOAT candidate constantly failing to win it while also crying and raging suggests that he cannot be the GOAT candidate at all. Djokovic has been failing when it really mattered for too long.Djokovic winning Olympics or not winning is his problem, if he craves for something which is not useful then thats his problem.
Olympics has been about testing boundaries of athleticism, otherwise even cheerleading at the olympics can be considered special day of your life, but that doesn't mean it should be considered special
Tennis at the olympics is just timepaas, not of any significance in the GOAT race even 1%, its points are 0 in the calendar year, that is its worth !!
Very troublesome as a Djokovic fan.Incorrect analysis. The Olympics is bigger than the game of tennis itself and therefore has to be much bigger than Slams. The so-called GOAT candidate constantly failing to win it while also crying and raging suggests that he cannot be the GOAT candidate at all. Djokovic has been failing when it really mattered for too long.
Incorrect analysis. The Olympics is bigger than the game of tennis itself and therefore has to be much bigger than Slams. The so-called GOAT candidate constantly failing to win it while also crying and raging suggests that he cannot be the GOAT candidate at all. Djokovic has been failing when it really mattered for too long.
Hilarious that you actually have some Rafa-obsessives voting for the OGM in this poll. One slam is worth 500 OGM's in tennis. No debate.No debate here. One slam, just one slam by itself is worth more than OG. 4 slams, and in a row?
Honestly, I laughed so much while writing that post.thats an argument like that Beggarseve
Honestly, I laughed so much while writing that post.
Only Murray would disagree.Murray would disagree
Only Murray would disagree.
Zverev said Olympics was biggest title he has ever won.
We have already reported him to the Nole authorities. We expect a swift actionVery troublesome as a Djokovic fan.
This fake Nole fan must be stopped for good.We have already reported him to the Nole authorities. We expect a swift action
Well ill take the views of a top.professional over social media users
Well ill take the views of a top.professional over social media users
Who skipped it by saying it was not important?No, you take the views of select top professionals. What about the views of the players who skipped the Olympics because they don’t view it as important at all? I’m guessing they don’t count for whatever reason you’ll come up with.
Zverev also said his 2021 season was one of the best of all time, a year without any slam wins lol.Zverev said Olympics was biggest title he has ever won. I think he has won more than 250 events?
Rafa has accomplished the Channel Slam twice.Btw Borg Channel Slams for me are massive and match anything the Big 3 did. The difference between clay and grass back then was enormous.
When ee discuss legacies Borg arguably had the greatest legacy to the game of all. He changed the sport in many ways.
What the heck is the NCYGS? Another trivial stats to boost Nole.
Either you have a Calendar Grand Slam or you don't.
4 slams in a row. Not even close. And I say that as a Nadal fan.
lolI've always thought you were a neutral tennis historian, first and foremost.
He won the Olympics. Kind of answers the thread titleZverev also said his 2021 season was one of the best of all time, a year without any slam wins lol.
And the Olympics is a glorified 250 lol.He won the Olympics. Kind of answers the thread title
Not what the profesionals think. Ill take their view.And the Olympics is a glorified 250 lol.
Not even in the same galaxy. Nadal beat just 1 player in the top 8 to win Olympic gold in 2008. An achievement to be sure. But not even approaching winning 1 slam in tennis achievement terms, let alone 4 slams in a row. And I mean no disrespect to Rafa in saying that.See title. Which is more of an impressive achievement: NCYGS (4 straight majors in a row in 2 calendar years) or an Olympic Gold in Singles.
I like to look at it as which is more historically relevant of an achievement. Olympic Gold in Singles or a NCYGS?
Men’s OE NCYGS:
Laver
Djokovic
Women’s OE NCYGS:
Graf
Serena (also Olympic Gold holders each)
Navratilova (who won 6 in a row)
Court
What the heck is the NCYGS? Another trivial stats to boost Nole.
Either you have a Calendar Grand Slam or you don't.
So why do some "professionals" choose to play a 250 over the Olympics?Not what the profesionals think. Ill take their view.
Thats easy. They would be ones who have no chance of a medal but need the money and rankig points. Tennis is hard at the lower levels.So why do some "professionals" choose to play a 250 over the Olympics?