anointedone
Banned
The year end #1 ranking for women seems to be between 5 women-Jankovic, Henin, Sharapova, Venus, Serena. So who will end the year ranked #1?
Realisticaly it probably has to be Henin or Jankovic unless there is a serious injury to Henin, and maybe Jankovic as well. If there is an injury that causes one or both to miss a significant amount of time maybe Ivanovic, Serena, and Venus have a shot too.
No way could I see Kuznetsova or Sharpova collecting the points needed.
Jankovic reminds me of a slimmer version of Kim Clijsters, but she has had a great year and most likely have a better 2nd half. It is only a matter of time before she breaks through at a slam or the constant playing catches up with her.
Serena or Venus doesn't play enough tournaments to accumulate the points needed to become #1.
I would like to see Ivanovic have an even stronger 2nd half, Sharapova I could honestly care less what she does, and the other hand of the Russian wave, I like Kuznnetsovas game but she appears to me as only a consistent, "quarterfinal", "semifinal" player.
I like Vaidisova. I see her as a technicaly sounder superior version of Sharapova. While I think Jankovic and Ivanovic both have great potential, and potential to win slams in the future, I think of all 3 Vaidisova has the most potential to maybe be a dominant player. What is most disconcerting of her so far is her nerves. She seems to be making strides on how to construct her points, moving better, playing some better defence.
However in her first slam semi vs Kuznetsova she dictated the match, served for a straights set win in the 2nd set, choked, then fell apart the rest of the match. That is perhaps understandable, dissapointing but understandable, it was her first slam semi after all. However then in the Australian Open semis vs Serena this past year she again chokes trying to finish out the 1st set. While her game did not completely fall apart afterwords, as it did in the French Open semis, she still had a serious emotional letdown and could not recover enough to keep up her level of tennis of the first set in the second set. Then Wimbledon this year vs Ivanovic in the quarters, blowing a match point and a big lead in the 3rd and final set. Usually young players learn from those type of experiences. How to close out matches or sets, or how to battle through adversity, is not something she seems to be making any progress in.
Thank you, I love the way you think. But I have seen and read a few pieces in her and have seen a lot of her matches. I have no idea why but I think I like the girl..lol
But she has displayed some nerves in the big stages in matches that she was dominating, also in the matches she has displayed some nice versatility, which will help her in the long run. Mentally when she puts it together I think she will dominate for years to come, her support team seems very strong and have the right idea in constructing her future.
The support team is a big problem in my opinion. Vaidisova radiates insecurity, her need to look up at her team after every significant point and her tendency to complain to them when things don't go her way speaks volumes. When you look at the [relatively] mentally stronger women in Serena, Venus, Henin and Sharapova they rarely look up to their box seeking validation, the times they do look up there it's to pump a fist to psyche themselves up.
Vaidisova needs to learn to stand on her own when she steps up to that line.
Yeah what superman1 said; Henin looks up for reassurance but doesn't look like she expects/is looking for validation from there. When Vaidisova looks to her box it seems she's doing either one of three things:
a) yeah, check out that shot!
b) i can't keep a ball in, help!
c) i'm losing this match because of you guys
How many of Justines matches have you watched lately?
Justine is 25, Nicole is 17, give the kid a break.
I kind of agree to what you guys are saying about the VAIDISOVA/SHARAPOVA debate. It's easy to compare them because they are somewhat attractive blonds. I agree that Nicole Vaidisova's strokes are more technically solid and her serve is just as big as Sharapova's and her service motion is SO SMOOTH. Which leads to my point, Sharapova's starting to have the serving yips....aka the Anna/Elena syndrome. And once you start having doubts about your 2nd serve, it's very hard to recover from that. Maria at one time according to Mary Carillo had the best 2nd serve in women's tennis. This was because she went for it and hit it very flat above the 90mph range consistently and DIDN'T double fault hardly at all...but now days her serve is getting worse since her "shoulder injuries"....she doesn't have that fearless, free-swinging confidence on serve like she used to....which I'm not trying to play devil's advocate here by any means, but I'm just saying that Maria really needs to train even harder to find a level better than she was when she was this time last year and even some of 04 and 05...this is because there are more athletic girls (better movers) that can do the same things she can...serve big and hit relentless groundstrokes. Sharapova is not as gifted of a mover as Venus or Serena, especially Venus...which both sisters hit bigger serves and harder groundies. Ana Ivanovic moves relatively well...and she's slowly starting to surpass Maria...killed her twice this year easily and has done better in the last 2 slams...now I'm not bashing Maria by any means, but back to Vaidisova comparison...I think Vaidisova has a better all-around game than Sharapova and may eventually surpass her. BUT what Sharapova does have is a champion's heart and very few players have that. Many people thought Anna Kournikova would surpass both Williams sisters and Hingis, and there was reason to think that because she had an impressive junior career and Nick Bollettieri said that she was the best prospect and natural talent he had ever seen come to his academy even today. Yes, Nick still thinks Anna was the most talented female junior ever to come through his academy....but what she did not do was DEVELOP or listen to his advice for a long enough period (if you know the Anna story, Anna's mom made her leave the academy prematurely)....And I guess this leads to my point, Does Vaidisova have the talent to challenge for slam titles...that is a resounding yes...However, does she have the mental capability? We'll see...
Serena or Venus doesn't play enough tournaments to accumulate the points needed to become #1.
Both sisters are more concerned abt winning the Grand Slams than the ranking at this moment.