Rolex make good watches, but not the best in the market.
What do you like maximo?
I don't know enough about watches to pass judgment at such a high level, what would you say makes them better?
Anybody know what kinda Rolex Fed was wearing? Really nice watch I must say
It's a PJ and heavily leaded at 3 and 9 o'clock.
You bring up a good point. Rolex is not even close to being the best watch out there. It is just heavily advertised. You can find Rolex in every mall, or watch store, while more exclusive, and therefore better watches are only found in specialty stores. There is an interesting article about this called "Face Value," which is in the New Yorker (May 25). For people who don't know a lot about watches, Rolex is the best. For others who know something, there are many better brands that I can name if anyone asks.
I think the key issue with Rolex is that they outsource their movements, while many of the other brands manufacture their own.
Lange makes some beautiful watches, but I'm partial to IWC Pilots and some of the simpler Panerai....more the "rugged" type watches of the fine movement spectrum.
Of course, a Portuguese is nothing to sneer on for formal occasions.
Not too big on the Breitlings.
Rolexes are just too ubiquitous IMO
I like watches, I started collecting them from my dad, I have two that I use on an everyday basis, one Rolex, and one Omega, the others are far too dressy to wear every day.
The Sea Dweller, I didn't like the Submariner, though I know a lot of people have it, I didn't like the little date bubble that's there...I thought it was a bit tacky:
The Omega Seamaster (no not the James Bond Version):
Audemars Piguet, Patek Philippe, Ulysse Nardin, Vacheron Constantin, et al are very special Houses of Horology, and their timepieces are functional works of art. However, most very serious watch collectors and cognoscenti agree that a Breguet, with as many complications in its movement as possible, is the ne plus ultra in the world of watchmaking and watch collecting - the finest there is.
I like the Milgaus. It looks good!
One thing about Rolex, it may not produce the most luxurious watches in the world, it is easily the most recognized luxurious watch brand... It has a distinct design that when you wear it to a ball, people will recognize it easily. Thats why people buy them.
Its abit like why you buy Nike, when you know the New Balance or Aiscs shoes are more comfortable.
I've had the Sea Dweller for about 1.5 years now. It's an amazing watch and like you, I did not like the date bubble of the Submariner. I also like the extra thickness of the Sea Dweller. It's just a little beefier watch than the Submariner.
Also, I have the peace of mind knowing that if I ever dive down to 12k feet, my watch will survive! :shock:
Guys...
if you collect watches because of the way they look...buy the swiss replicas..
Authorized Rolex dealers cannot tell the difference. On most models you are getting a genuine rolex on the outside...stainless steele etc., the guts are what is different, but it's still high quality swiss movement.
I bought a Submariner of a site like this in 2000 and it still looks like new and is 100% foolproof.
Paid 700.00 instead of 9,000.00 for the real one.
No difference at all...
you can google the sites....just make sure you do your due dilignece and you'll be fine.
Wrong.
Huge difference between the 150.00 replicas and the 700.00 ones.
On the $700.00 watches, everything is spot on down to weight and 100% accurate markings.
The 150.00 are not as heavy duty, certainly don't weigh as much and in most cases are flawed from a markings standpoint.
If you are dumb enough to buy a $10,000.00 for a watch by all means go right ahead.
I will keep wearing my $700.00 replica that licensed dealers cannot distinguish and continue to stash the $9,300.00 in the bank
But they don't keep better time than my Timex. Sorry, but to me a watch is an appliance, not an adornment. But that's just me.