Boycott, really? That would really be bad for tennis then...
yes, it would be bad in the short term, but if and when things got worked out, then the players would have a shorter schedule.
the question i have is "where do you cut?" the spot that i think of is right after the uso. if that happens, then japan and the asian tourneys are gonna have to be moved before ao or they aren't gonna happen, which it wouldn't be nice for the fans if they didn't happen. and if you move these tourneys, then you're gonna have to start the season earlier (please correct me if i'm wrong but isn't there only one warmup for the ao?). if you did that, then you are still shortening the offseason, although it might be better than it currently is. slight improvement is still improvement.
no matter what happens things will never be perfect and someone will always be complaining. if the year ends start a week or so after the uso, then any top player who either gets injured at the uso or goes out early and drops out of the field will complain about not having time to recover or regain points, whatever the case is.
how will the atp/ itf decide which events are moved and which are cut? who do they say no to? are they willing to deal with the consequences of their actions?
while they are addressing the schedule, why don't the straighten out the season in terms of surface (hard, clay, grass, hard instead of hard, clay, hard, clay, grass, clay, hard) and shorten the uso series.