Wait until Verdasco ends up in Nadal's half in London.
Roddick in the second set TB in the Wimbledon final. It was too sad.
It would be true if he had MPs but he didn't,players against Nadal had up to 5 MPs but still couldn't win.Bigger choke if you have MPs than SPs,no?
It would be true if he had MPs but he didn't,players against Nadal had up to 5 MPs but still couldn't win.Bigger choke if you have MPs than SPs,no?
I don't know, Almagro up 40-0 serving for the match and finding some way to screw it up, that was pretty bad.
True, but it was a decisive moment IMO. Had Roddick won that second set, he would have been more likely to win the match considering the way he was playing and the psychological advantage he would have taken from a 2 set lead.
Maybe but Fed recently came back from 0-2 down 2-3 times recently so it wouldn't have been a done deal(heck he almost came back from 0-2 against Nadal at Wimbledon last year) while with MPs if you convert-the match is simply over,no ifs an buts.
i almost forgot
haas at RG was just sickening to watch
he simply disappeared in the last two sets, what the hell happened there:-?
Still, it's just a MS.. and one of the least prestigious to boot.. It's not like it was at Rome or Miami... Wimbledon, that's every players dream to win....
A choke is a choke,Roddick never had MPs,Almagro and Nalbandian had 10 amongst them.Heck Roddick never even served for the match.
Wimbledon >>>>>> Bercy or IW
I still say Nalbandian. It was a mega choke.
MPs>>>>>>>>SPs.
Roddick's choke cost him a 2 set lead and a real chance to win Wimbledon and be immortalized as a Wimbledon champion
Almagro lost the chance to go to the 3rd round of Paris and Nalbandian lost a chance to go to the Quarterfinals of Indian Wells
Roddick wins based on importance of choke.
gj011>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I don't know, Almagro up 40-0 serving for the match and finding some way to screw it up, that was pretty bad.
Gonzo just choked 7 (was it more) matchpoints against Del Potro and then retired after losing a second set tiebreaker.
Roddick's choke cost him a 2 set lead and a real chance to win Wimbledon and be immortalized as a Wimbledon champion
Almagro lost the chance to go to the 3rd round of Paris and Nalbandian lost a chance to go to the Quarterfinals of Indian Wells
Roddick wins based on importance of choke.
Almagro based purely on the quality and artistry of the choke, and not the importance of the choke. It was some of the finest choking I had ever seen.
I still say Nalbandian. It was a mega choke.
Nalbandian always chokes. Even when he wins he always gets broken serving out for matches. Maybe he plays his worst tennis at the worst possible times - instead of glitching upstairs.
Anaconda said:Nalbandian found a way to lose after having 7 match points against Nadal in indian wells......
How about Federer vs Berdych at the AO? The bird man was 2 sets up but then he suddenly went into high school mode. Let's not talk about how many set points, break points he didnt convert. It's the kind of sitters that he was missing that makes me cringe. Go youtube it or something and you'll know what i mean.