S
Serendipitous
Guest
I vote for Murray.
By what metric would Murray have a chance in this poll?
Djokovic, by far. The 1 Grand slam is the pinnacle of his career - it's something he will always be remembered by. Murray doesn't have that . Djokovic even has more tournaments won overall than Murray - 18 to 16. Djokovic has consistently had higher year-end rankings than Murray, even though Murray has surpassed him for little bits in the middle. They have the same number of Masters Series titles (if you count Djokovic's masters cup, which should perhaps count for even more.)
By what metric would Murray have a chance in this poll?
my vote goes to djokovic.. 1 grand slam > 0 grand slams
Tough call.
- one fluke slam vs no slam. Tie.
- annoying mother vs annoying mother. Tie.
- gf okay vs gf okay. Tie.
-funny impersonations vs fugly impersonations. Đoković wins.
Tough call.
- one fluke slam vs no slam. Tie.
- annoying mother vs annoying mother. Tie.
- gf okay vs gf okay. Tie.
-funny impersonations vs fugly impersonations. Đoković wins.
Djokovic's gf is hotter methinks
Yep. And the WTF win against tired and injured players. Another fluke. Anything he has ever won was when the entire field was tired and injured.I thought we didn't count that slam anymore. :-?
Me thinks you kept your thermometer in there longer.I'm sorry but Rafa's gf is hotter than both.
Me thinks you kept your thermometer in there longer.
Do you mind my posting in youre tread, RI , er Serendip.The above poster stimulates the poster below me.
Djokovic at the moment. Murray by the end of his career.
- annoying mother vs annoying mother. Tie.
Me thinks you kept your thermometer in there longer.
Gael Meowfils. ???
definitely djokovic:
1 major, 5 masters shields, and 11 500 or lower titles, for a total of 18 singles titles
murray:
0 majors, 6 masters shields, 10 500 or lower titles, for a total of 16 titles.
not much debate, really.
djokovic has also made more slam finals, and put up much better fights in both the ones he lost.
Djokovic has a grand slam and having a grand slam is important - because, as you know, Murray doesn't have a grand slam, and when you don't have a grand slam, that could be a problem - especially when you compare someone with a grand slam to someone without a grand slam at all. it seems like the person with the grand slam would be the obvious choice over the person without any grand slam. So, you really need to consider grand slam performance when you compare Djokovic (again, the one with a grand slam) to Murray (the one with no grand slam at all).
also, grand slam
Djokovic has a grand slam and having a grand slam is important - because, as you know, Murray doesn't have a grand slam, and when you don't have a grand slam, that could be a problem - especially when you compare someone with a grand slam to someone without a grand slam at all. it seems like the person with the grand slam would be the obvious choice over the person without any grand slam. So, you really need to consider grand slam performance when you compare Djokovic (again, the one with a grand slam) to Murray (the one with no grand slam at all).
also, grand slam
How many times are people going to point out Murray hasn't won a slam event yet? It is just one slam event that separates him from the likes of Djokovic and Del Potro, and when he wins it, they are back to being equal. All it takes is two great weeks and you have your slam winner. Murray is more than capable of winning them.
How many times are people going to point out Murray hasn't won a slam event yet? It is just one slam event that separates him from the likes of Djokovic and Del Potro, and when he wins it, they are back to being equal. All it takes is two great weeks and you have your slam winner. Murray is more than capable of winning them.
djokovic, at least he won a slam
And even if you got rid of that slam entirely, he'd still have a better career — and, from what I have glimpsed from afar, a better life off the court.
You see, whereas Murray is merely funny-looking, Djokovic is genuinely funny — not only with his famed impressions, but in his interviews. One of the highlights from the U.S. Open was his increasing use of erotic comparisons after winning a match. First, triumph was like a blissful sexual encounter. The next night, in reference to Roger's tweeners, Novak declared he had something else between his legs with which to concern himself. So, while Djokovic spends his nights in long, sensual workouts, Murray prefers to spend his in the company of a video-game console, his joystick in his hand.
Plus, Djokovic's goofy parents look like fun drunks; Murray's mom looks like a raging alcoholic who would beat him with a tennis racket handle if he misses a drop shot. I'd feel sorry for him if he weren't a multimillionaire.
And even if you got rid of that slam entirely, he'd still have a better career — and, from what I have glimpsed from afar, a better life off the court.
You see, whereas Murray is merely funny-looking, Djokovic is genuinely funny — not only with his famed impressions, but in his interviews. One of the highlights from the U.S. Open was his increasing use of erotic comparisons after winning a match. First, triumph was like a blissful sexual encounter. The next night, in reference to Roger's tweeners, Novak declared he had something else between his legs with which to concern himself. So, while Djokovic spends his nights in long, sensual workouts, Murray prefers to spend his in the company of a video-game console, his joystick in his hand.
Plus, Djokovic's goofy parents look like fun drunks; Murray's mom looks like a raging alcoholic who would beat him with a tennis racket handle if he misses a drop shot. I'd feel sorry for him if he weren't a multimillionaire.
I hear what you're saying, but what about the fact that Djokovic has a grand slam
and MURRAY HAS ZERO GRAND SLAMS??