The hypocrisy on this board is too funny for words. "An almost win does not count"???? Have you seen the gazillion posts that have talked about all of Fed's hypothetical 'almost wins'?An almost win does not count. Djokovic will continue to dominate. He's not going anywhere just yet IMO.
Peter Bodo:
"Although Djokovic's level of mid-2011 may be impossible to sustain, his decline in the fall has not only given him plenty of time for rest and rehab, it's also apt to make him hungry and more eager to get rolling in 2012....
I wish I knew enough English to understand what that line means. If Nadal is knocked out, how can Fed smell his fingers.
Anyway, let it be. es complicado.
_________________
Warm Vamoses,
Señor Senti.
I'll elaborate then. It means that Roger can have a chance to sniff the fingers of Nadal, with his nose, after they've been used on his arse crack/bum **** thing. By extension, that Federer might not be so far away from the top spot again, but currently his nose isn't close at all to Nadal's well used digits.
Peter Bodo:
"Although Djokovic's level of mid-2011 may be impossible to sustain, his decline in the fall has not only given him plenty of time for rest and rehab, it's also apt to make him hungry and more eager to get rolling in 2012. And that has to make the other members of tennis' big four somewhat uneasy, especially when you factor in the degree in which those hard courts in Melbourne love Djokovic's game."
http://espn.go.com/tennis/blog/_/name/bodo_peter/id/7335155/tennis-novak-djokovic-doldrums-best
When Bobo is on board, you know something bad is about to happen. Just ask Andy Murray...
6-4 6-0.I hope paramedics are deployed when said event occurs. That will not be a Lindt 90% Excellence aroma.
That will not be a Lindt 90% Excellence aroma.
anyone who doesnt have their head up their azz with ****ism can clearly see that 2012 will be a wide open season.
all of the big 4 have questions about them, not to mention guys like tsonga, berdych and delpo who could step up and if not snag a major, at least overturn the apple cart with upsets.
I dont believe at all that djoker 'tanked' everything post the US open( although I admit its possible). I think he does have legit physical concerns. I think rafa's game is questionable at the moment and who knows where his body is going physically. Who knows if Fed has enough to last at majors anymore, who knows where Murray will be mentally.
Lots of legit questions for 2012.
Nadal's game sure wasn't lacking vs Del Potro Davis Cup.
Yes it was in every single aspect. He did not play that well,and was fortunate that Delpo was tired from playing a long match against Ferrer,otherwise he probably would have been straight setted.
Yes it was in every single aspect. He did not play that well,and was fortunate that Delpo was tired from playing a long match against Ferrer,otherwise he probably would have been straight setted.
Newc is just implying that Nadal and Djokovic have knocked themselves out so there's a chance Fed could have a sniff next season of Nadal's fingers.
I can see it. Joker has put in a ton of work and his style is VERY tough on the body. I think that he just out Nadaled Nadal last year but both of those guys play a similar style..I think Joker is just a slightly better over all athlete and though their game is similar, his physicality and new mental toughness got him over the hump. Having said that, Roger's game is much "easier on the body" and I don't think he hurts himself as much over an "entire season' as either of those other two....never has. I would not predict Roger becoming number 1 again but it would not blow me away to see it nor would it suprise me if Joker does indeed fail physically quicker. Just watching him play makes me exhausted.
Grinders like Nadal/Djokovic don't have longevity in the sport.
They don't need to have it to do well next year. They're still only 24/25.
Grinders are usually done and dusted once they hit 27.
I don't see either of these players winning slams at 27+....
I'm not so sure we can call them grinders (though admittedly I was unaware of the term until I read it in these forums). Is that supposed to mean simply that they're mainly defensive players?. Because it's not like they don't play aggressively too.
Grinders like Nadal/Djokovic don't have longevity in the sport.
Newcombe is really going to struggle with his depends under garments next year. Crapping himself at the drop of a hat.
speaking of butthurt...
so much hateful posts in this thread. is this guy not allowed to give his opinions? *******s certainly talk about pro-Nadal opinions as if theyre revelations from God..
30 winners in each point, boy !! Clark's standards sure are high !!!If Nadal doesn't hit 30 winners and 0 UE then Clarky thinks he played badly. So one can kind of understands her perspective no matter how stupid it may be.
That's what I said in 2010.Federer for the Golden CYGS.
30 winners in each point, boy !! Clark's standards sure are high !!!
She doesn't play the actual tennis, Senti. Maybe Wii.
Rafa played a fantastic match in sets 2 and 3.
Not really. He was still hitting short and defending as if his life depended on it. Not to mention how crappy his backhand was. The fourth set(and obviously the first set)was a disaster,and he was lucky to win it.
Not really. He was still hitting short and defending as if his life depended on it. Not to mention how crappy his backhand was. The fourth set(and obviously the first set)was a disaster,and he was lucky to win it.
you seem to be obsessed with rafa(i must admit every chick dreams of him so nothing new here)..hence such high rate of posting..u r his secret admirer..c'mon u gotta admit this publicly.
Lol,you are really starting to fall off the deep end,dude. You better catch yourself before tumble completely off.
I guess you failed to catch yourself off or nobody bothered with you, huh mama, lol.
There are subtler ways to imply that Nadal is doping, you know...
I'm implying that Federer has a bigger longevity problem than Nadal, considering Nadal is dominating RG for longer than Federer dominated any of the slams.
Doesn't Fed have 6 slams on grass and Nadal 6 on clay?
The hypocrisy on this board is too funny for words. "An almost win does not count"???? Have you seen the gazillion posts that have talked about all of Fed's hypothetical 'almost wins'?
Bobo is a muppet.
Djokovic was last playing, with an injured shoulder, only a few days before Federer, Tsonga, Berdych etc's last competitive matches. His rest/recovery time is basically no different to any of those guys.
Nadal's game sure wasn't lacking vs Del Potro Davis Cup.
Doesn't Fed have 6 slams on grass and Nadal 6 on clay?
Just like
Djoker owns Nadal
DjokovicFortheWin owns nadalwon2012
What's so odd? Federer in decline is better than Nadal at peak
Nadals numbers are inflated cause of clay. In some ways djoker is already ahead
Exactly, Nadal is clay court wonder, nothing more nothing less. Nadal fans should be happy with this speciality.
The guy just can't accept defeat and always has to qualify a loss with something or other.
New POLL addition:
NadalAgassi is the biggest idiot on the planet.
If you agree with this choice, type 'AYE'!
Yes but do you seriously think Nadal is finished? 8-10 RGs is a given, and that shoots dead anyone's theory that Federer had greater longevity than Nadal.
It could be Rafa and Federer at 1 and 2 by the US Open. I thought it would only be Rafa.
And that could mean we start getting Djokodal semifinals.