rofl_copter3
Professional
Ferrer is more likely to win one that raonic... Honestly raonic will have the same problems Isner faces unless he learns to play some defense and increase his ground stroke consistancy
If he's going to do it he's going to have to beat Fed and Cvac,and I just do not see that happening right now,especially when it comes to beating Cvac.
Tomic needs to get his head in the game. He is almost 2 years younger than Raonic yet he has managed to reach the QFs of a slam unlike Raonic. I was impressed at how nicely he was getting under Djokovic's skin during the 2011 Wimbledon QF, since then he has been mugging it up.
I know Raonic and Nishikori aren't even in the same talent universe but still, Raonic shouldn't be in the process of eating a bagel is he "is about to break through".
agreed and approved!
well, at least he spanked the Muzz :twisted:
Murray didn't get spanked. He gave it away.
Slamray just wanted more time to prepare for Shanghai. The Scot's focus is on slams nowadays anyway. If the servebot plays Murray again in any slams, the result will be the same as the one at USO.
I can still taste the sweet taste of that bagel
I think that Murray ups his level a notch in majors these days (just compare his results to the Masters) but Raonic's win yesterday was 100 % legit. I don't think a guy can give a match away and scream his lungs out in anguish after easy misses if he doesn't care. He wanted to win that match but Raonic just took it to him.
Raonic's previous two matches showed significant progress, but today's have shown that he's still got a way to go.
Murray did want to win yesterday, and he played well for a lot of it, but he wasn't super-focused, and he was the much more tired player, so the victory needs to be kept in context. Impressive, and a nice feather in his cap, but not the trumpet of a new dawn.
Today, Raonic was the more tired player, and he struggled. If he is to become a regular in the quarters, semis and finals of big competitions, he's going to be this tired a lot more often.
Nevertheless, none of his immediate peers are looking like obvious slam winners, and someone is going to have to win them. In a few years time, Federer will be retired, and possibly Nadal too, so it will be down to whether or not Djokovic and Murray can maintain their own levels and enthusiasm against the challengers.
Raonic is still in good stead to be the "next guy" to break through, but I think it will be another two or three years before he can become s a serious challenger.
The win is legit but he utterly fail to back it up the next match.
With Lendl around in slams, you'll see the same Andy back to how he was at USO. Plus, energy wouldn't be wasted playing doubles in slams so Raonic will not be so lucky facing a 100% Murray (with a sore back) next time.
Murray said yesterday that Mr Lendl will next make an appearance 'the week before the WTF'. I found it revealing that he used these words rather than saying he would be back for Paris.
What was Murray tired from?
I think he should skip Paris (e.g tank early) after Shanghai and focus on WTF. I know he's not played enough matches on the tour yet to be given the option to skip a Masters but he should focus on giving a real go at defending Shanghai then focus all of his efforts to make sure he doesn't burn out before London.
Raonic's previous two matches showed significant progress, but today's have shown that he's still got a way to go.
Murray did want to win yesterday, and he played well for a lot of it, but he wasn't super-focused, and he was the much more tired player, so the victory needs to be kept in context. Impressive, and a nice feather in his cap, but not the trumpet of a new dawn.
Today, Raonic was the more tired player, and he struggled. If he is to become a regular in the quarters, semis and finals of big competitions, he's going to be this tired a lot more often.
Nevertheless, none of his immediate peers are looking like obvious slam winners, and someone is going to have to win them. In a few years time, Federer will be retired, and possibly Nadal too, so it will be down to whether or not Djokovic and Murray can maintain their own levels and enthusiasm against the challengers.
Raonic is still in good stead to be the "next guy" to break through, but I think it will be another two or three years before he can become s a serious challenger.
He was playing dubs this week - played until after 7pm on Friday night after playing Stan in the morning. Semi started at 1200 the next day. I dare say there is also some residual tiredness/general fatigue that all the guys who have played a lot of matches feel.
Not an excuse for losing though - big fella won fair and square. Same as Kei did today - but I'm pretty sure yesterday's events would have had some bearing on the outcome of the 3rd set today.
Murray had two match points against Raonic and still lost the match.
That stinks more of mental tiredness than anything else to me.
Murray's clutchiness of recent times wasn't there.
The win is legit but he utterly fail to back it up the next match.
With Lendl around in slams, you'll see the same Andy back to how he was at USO. Plus, energy wouldn't be wasted playing doubles in slams so Raonic will not be so lucky facing a 100% Murray (with a sore back) next time.
Yep. The BH UE on match point 2 was a bit of a head scratcher. Them's the breaks though - you can' win them all (unless it's 2011 and your name is Novak).
Murray had two match points against Raonic and still lost the match.
That stinks more of mental tiredness than anything else to me.
Murray's clutchiness of recent times wasn't there.
disappointed with Mugonic today and kudos to Kei. I said earlier, go easy on Milos with all of these GS predictions etc. meh. Raonic has no business losing to Kei ... just pathetic.
Got beaten down by Nishikori today.
All hopes of RaoRao becoming a future GS champion dashed...
disappointed with Mugonic today and kudos to Kei. I said earlier, go easy on Milos with all of these GS predictions etc. meh. Raonic has no business losing to Kei ... just pathetic.
The GS fate of a 21 year old rests on the final of a 500 event?
disappointed with Mugonic today and kudos to Kei. I said earlier, go easy on Milos with all of these GS predictions etc. meh. Raonic has no business losing to Kei ... just pathetic.
Just like in Barcelona? ChokingMurray didn't get spanked. He gave it away.
The GS fate of a 21 year old rests on the final of a 500 event?
Not really. I wasn't explaining away why he didn't win today, as I think Kei won fair and square with excellent tennis.Excuses. :lol:
Not really. I wasn't explaining away why he didn't win today, as I think Kei won fair and square with excellent tennis.
It's more a case of trying to gauge where he is with his overall game and what's getting in his way. Today's score to me makes it look like he ran out of gas, and people are saying that's because of a couple of tough three-setters. If he is to progress, he can't be worn out by a couple of tough three-setters in a 500.
If he is to get the wins to be a regular in the top ten he'll be playing more matches, and tougher matches. Everyone was getting excited that he was moving around the court more than ever before, but with improved court coverage comes increased energy expenditure.
In that respect, his fitness/stamina may be the next thing he has to work on if he hopes to play to his potential when he makes it to his next final.
Just like in Barcelona? Choking
What was Raonic's excuse when he was spanked in front of the world on AA?
He was a lord, went to Murray and congratulated him. And smiled.
He was a lord, went to Murray and congratulated him. And smiled.
Compare with the poor, poor show Murray did in their last match.
And remember: it's 2-1, and the last was won by Raonic. He's beating him on all surfaces. Showing him who's boss.
And remember: it's 2-1, and the last was won by Raonic. He's beating him on all surfaces. Showing him who's boss.
He'll need to beat him at the really big events ie. Slams and Masters before he can stake a claim to being 'his boss'.
He deserved his win against Murray yesterday but it has to be said that Murray probably should have won it. It is highly unusual for him to squander a 4-1 lead in the final set of a match and then miss a fairly straightforward backhand return on the second match point.
Nevertheless, he has re-established himself as one of only 4 top players to have a positive H2H v Murray (the others being Nadal,Djokovic and Berdych) and the only lesser ranked player to do so along with Berdych. Kudos to him for that.
He was a lord, went to Murray and congratulated him. And smiled.
Compare with the poor, poor show Murray did in their last match.
And remember: it's 2-1, and the last was won by Raonic. He's beating him on all surfaces. Showing him who's boss.
I think Kohly is 'a top player' - he's certainly top 20. He also has a positive H2H with Murray.