tennisbuck
Hall of Fame
self explanatory
Mine is Alcupolco. 500 so usually a decent turnout. filled with classic clay court tennis.
Mine is Alcupolco. 500 so usually a decent turnout. filled with classic clay court tennis.
self explanatory
Mine is Alcupolco. 500 so usually a decent turnout. filled with classic clay court tennis.
lol at RG being important.RG and Wimbledon the most important tournaments.
lol at RG being important.
RG is the least of the 4 slams. US Open and Wimbledon the most.LOL more at this post.
RG is the least of the 4 slams. US Open and Wimbledon the most.
RG is the least of the 4 slams. US Open and Wimbledon the most.
I think you'll find that the general consensus is
1. Wimbledon
2/3. French Open/US Open
4. Australian Open
I think you will find the consensus of importance of the slams is
Tied for 1: Australian Open, Roland Garros, Wimbledon, US Open.
lol at RG being important.
If you go by points, sure. Personally I'm amused that you don't know that Wimbledon is still considered the biggest prize in Tennis, and likely will be for years to come, even if the other Slams are just as coveted and just as valuable.
I based it on prestige.And what would you be basing this misinformation on? It's funny to me, because it seems to me that considering they all are worth the same amount of points, they would all be important. But if you have some factual information to support your ridiculous claim, why don't you share it with us? Or is it just because it's been dominated by 1 player (with the exception of one year) since 2005?
I based it on prestige.
Not as prestigious as Wimbledon or the US Open. And the Australian Open I find more interesting as well. The night matches there bring an electic atmosphere. Who cares about moonballing tennis anyways?Well, then, it's still a ridiculous claim that RG is not "prestigious".
The term was "important", not most dreamed about players winning.
Wimbledon, US Open, Cincinnati, WTF, Paris/Bercy and Dubai