trader1499
Rookie
So this means if you beat me tomorrow, you will be 3.5 too since you beat a 3.5.
@corbind,
How about the humble, and noncommital, He Who Lobs (or should it be, He That Lobs)? I like that better than The Lobbyest, or Lob Guy, etc.
Unfortunately, I didn't get a chance to lob much in my match yesterday. Played a few good points though. Video soon.
Yeah, you see they're and their, your and you're, then and than mixed up a lot."He Who Lobs" sounds like a fine title for ya! I've always used the word "who" when talking about people and "that" for everything else. Unfortunately that distinction is not followed any more. Occasionally I'll say something like "the person that" as opposed to "who" but yet as soon as I hear it aloud I want to restate it. Hell, we spell words wrong all the time and it's accepted into the dictionary eventually. Note that in forums I don't care all that much as it's informal. We're here to communicate and as long as the message is conveyed easily we're fine (exception is text-speak for entire posts). Yet in formal writing I cringe...
I get more agitated when I see stuff like....
"I could care less" (couldn't)
"He did a complete 360" (180)
Incorrect usage of too, to, and two and similar
Part of my brain wants to give 'em a brake (<see what I did there?) blaming it on people typing on a tiny phone keyboard (maybe while driving). Auto-correct screwed it up? Eh, I know better. A lot of kids spent too much time smokin' and skipping class instead of learning. It was not until my last year of grad school someone pointed out I'd been spelling "maybe" incorrectly as "mabey" (I'm not dyslexic). That being said everyone gets some slack.
Video and stats from Oct 10 league match.
Video and stats from Oct 10 league match.
TomT (3.0) vs trader1499 (3.5)
Location: Florence Hardy Park, Fort Lauderdale
Result: trader1499 won 10-3
-----------------------TomT--------trader1499
First Serves In----------41%------------38%
Second Serves In-------75%------------93%
Total Serves In---------54%------------59%
Double Faults------------6---------------2
Service Winners----------7---------------6
Aces--------------------0----------------2
Unforced Errors---------23---------------19
Winners-----------------8---------------13
Games 1 to 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_W3jpNteJKo
Games 4 to 7
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDWCuA_qgD4
Games 8 to 13
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHqhAeozin4
I was just thinking about that today. Anyway, I think I'm going back to serving two hard serves, and hitting harder groundstrokes. I felt I was steadily improving for a while doing that, and then decided to hit softer stuff to improve stats and hopefully also my chances of winning, but it's screwing up my game. It's just a matter of hitting a few thousand more serves and groundstrokes. hahahahaTom, I like how you show the stats for each match. That gives clues how it went down without even watching the video. I read the stats first (ignoring the win loss stat till the end). Then I watch the video and observe. All I know is a high unforced error rate usually equates to a loss in most cases. For me the unforced error rate (UE / winners) tells me how conservative a guy played and usually tells me which guy won.
I think just standing off the baseline and the center line extension about a half a foot or so should do it. It shouldn't affect your serves at all. But it's probably a good idea to get some practice time in on that before your next match.Are you talking about my foot faults? I know I'm not supposed to be stepping on the baseline, but is crossing the middle a rule too? I honestly don't know. I have to get in the habit of controlling my feet or just stand back farther.
When I'm serving both serves hard, then I practice that more, and so I'm just doing it a lot more and it gets grooved. When it's grooved (to, say, better than 60% consistency) it's effective and I have the feeling that gets me more points than I lose on double faults. Plus, it keeps my opponents constantly on guard, not just because of the pace, but because I can then slip in a slower changeup that's effective because it's unexpected. Plus, it's just a lot more fun playing that way than dinking second serves. (I would love to learn a good topspin serve, but so far it hurts my wrist when I try to do that. I think I need somebody to work with me face to face on that.)Yea Tom, I like how you used to serve both serves with pace. Not sure when you went to the softer serves. I suppose if I looked hard enough I'd be able to see if those softer serves are actually gaining you more points. Less DF and more getting pounded but I've not watched/tallied to see which is better.
I like basically just serving two firsts, while varying pace and placement on both first and second serves enough to keep the opponent guessing.Whatever your first serve is -- it's great. The one you've used traditionally. Your second serve should be very, very much like your first but slightly higher and slower over the net. Obviously you make the call on serving two firsts, a first and a puff ball, a first and an almost first, etc.
Yeah, that was happening to me, it seemed. Guys hitting too many winners (or just taking the offensive) off of fluffy serves and groundies.All I know is you will find the right balance eventually. I agree, if you're gonna lose, may as well err on the side of reckless than lose while being safe -- with serves. We both know the most consistent guy almost always wins. He only loses if he puts up too fluffy of shots and the opponent just hits winners off them.
What I hope to do is to reduce the frequency of my league matches just enough so that editing the vids doesn't interfere with my keyboard time. Doing the stats doesn't take much time once the vids are edited. But editing out all the non-playing stuff takes about as long as the source video file is. So, for a, say, 2 hour video, I'm looking at ~ 2 hours of editing the snippets and making the files that will be uploaded to YouTube. About 20 minutes of compiling the stats and entering into the database for that. Then another 20 minutes or so to upload to YouTube. Then sending a copy to my opponent in the video, and posting here at TTW.I'm glad you take the time to write the stats. Certainly I'm not the only one who likes it and if it adds just 10 extra min of care then cool. Take time off video editing if you like. It's WAY easier to digest the way you do it and I don't know I can easily go back to watching 4x the video with everything in it. Few will have the patience. I know the keyboard arrow keys help speed things up. I just watched a video earlier and was hitting <-- and --> a ton to rewind and advance.
Music has been a lifelong hobby and occasional gig. I started with keyboards back in 1998 because I wanted to make some original music. You can check out examples of it at:Hope your music does well. That should occupy you for a bit. Did you sell your old keyboard?
I checked out the videos and replied to your thread Dimcorner. Nice work. I'm going to try that camera perspective.I liked your idea of match stats so I borrowed it on my post for my league match vid.
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=480459
I think at times you serve and just watch the ball land in and wait too long to get ready for the next shot. You should be able to get more points if you get ready right after the serve.
I was just thinking about that today. Anyway, I think I'm going back to serving two hard serves, and hitting harder groundstrokes.
The other way is more focused on movement, fitness, tactics, strategy, etc. Which is all important, but I think that first I just need to concentrate on ball striking. So, hard serves and hard groundstrokes, along with the occasional lob and drop volley and shank, etc. hahaha
Yeah, good point onehandbh. There's no getting around it I guess. The footwork and prep comes before the stroke.I think just focusing on hitting harder may potentially just groove more
current stroke technique and footwork problems.
Focusing on footwork will actually enable you to hit harder more often
and with more consistency b/c you'll be in better position more often to
take a good swing at the ball.
IMO, anticipation and footwork are two of the most important things to
learn in tennis. Everyone wants to focus on the the stroke but you can't
hit your stroke properly if you're out of position.
Oh ok, well done. There were some nice points. I think you might breadstick me as well. Maybe I'd be competitive if I was having an unusually good day. Anyway, you're definitely better than my experience (limited as it is) of 3.0 players. Exactly what your rating would be depends entirely on results of course. Thanks Dimcorner. Keep posting vids.I won 6-1 6-1
I don't know for sure. Been busy and haven't had a chance to look at it closely. Could be that tossing a bit higher and/or more out into the court and away from me produces some changes.Did you change your service motion in some way for the Oct 24 & 25 matches? Something is different. Doesn't seem as smooth as usual. Maybe it's just me.
Again, not sure. It doesn't seem to be too much different than how I was serving a year ago, but I'll have a look when I get a chance and see if I notice anything.On the second serve it seems your right foot is arriving too early so it seems your body is then late or jerky to catch up? I can't identify it but something is not quite right. Then again I serve from a platform stance stance so my right foot never crosses in front of my left. You're doing pinpoint stance so it's customary for the right to cross in front of the left for easier rotation.
Ok. Now you've got me curious too. I remember in the match of the 25th talking to my opponent about a couple of serves where everything seemed to come together in a more or less optimal, for me anyway, serving motion. It's almost a feeling of effortlessness. The toss is far enough into the court that when I make contact I'm leaning far enough that I pretty much have to take a step to keep from falling over, and the toss is high enough that the point of contact is high enough for a steep enough angled ball trajectory from the point of racquet contact to the point of court contact. The other two main variable factors that I experiment with are when in the swing I do the max effort, and how low or high my hand is on the racquet handle. The grip is pretty much the same all the time as far as I can tell ... some sort of slight variation on an eastern forehand grip.Can you watch your serve (both first and second) in those two videos and then look back at a video from a month ago and see if you see any differences? Likely you'd be able to figure them out best. Now I'm really curious....
Stats and video from Oct 26 league match:
TomT (3.0) vs Opponent (3.0)
Location: Florence Hardy Park, Fort Lauderdale
Result: Opponent won 10-4
------------------------TomT--------Opponent
First Serves In---------46%------------46%
Second Serves In--------65%-----------100%
Total Serves In---------53%------------65%
Double Faults------------9--------------0
Service Winners---------11--------------4
Aces---------------------1--------------2
Unforced Errors---------16-------------19
Winners------------------8-------------17
Games 1 to 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dHMj2uknF0
Games 4 to 7
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFqCQIaL1Uw
Games 8 to 11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7zMte0ZFos
Games 12 to 14
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3s9WaepNB8c
If you guess it's because of DFs and UEs (more importantly perhaps, UEs to winners ratio), plus bad serving (hmmm, that pretty much covers everything, I think), then I think you would be correct. I went up 3-0 in this match, and in those first 3 games I had 1 UE, 1 DF, 4 service winners, 1 ace and 3 winners. It was pretty much downhill from there. hahaha This is the basic pattern of most of my matches, and from that pattern I think it can be assumed that lack of optimum conditioning and fitness are the main reasons for my poorest playing, and that improvement is primarily a matter of getting on the court each day and hitting as many balls as I can. At least that's the current 'plan'.Without watching the videos, I can guess this is why you lost. Am I correct?
Been sick. Crohns's inflammation intensified. Gonna try to hit against the wall tomorrow.Been 5 days...you been rained out again?
I don't know. I'm always trying so many little tweaks here and there that I can't keep track. I do know that it isn't grooved at the moment. So, in my most recent match I just hit slow ones in the hope of just getting into the point. I could almost see my opponent's mouth watering. He was so anxious to hit winners off the nice easy serves I was giving him that I think he missed more than he made. hahahaTomT, are you using LESS shoulder turn on the takeback of your serves?
Something is different from last year. Your motion seems more compact, and quicker.
Nov 17, 2013
Unforced Errors---------22-------------17
Winners------------------7-------------15
Nov 17, 2013
Result: Opponent won 8-1
------------------------TomT---------Opponent
First Serves In---------67%------------58%
Second Serves In--------86%------------82%
Total Serves In---------72%------------65%
Double Faults------------2--------------2
Service Winners----------0--------------3
Aces---------------------0--------------0
Unforced Errors---------22-------------17
Winners------------------7-------------15
Games 1 to 5
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZmeY5N-vZQ
My UE/Winner ratio is consitently bad against all my opponents I think. The last one was especially bad I think because I was feeling worse than usual (though still better than during the recent flare.)Before watching your videos I always look at the stats (they're cool) and as I read along I was like, hmmm, kinda even. That is until we get to UE to Winner ratio (UE/W). You're at about 3 UE for each winner and he's about even. That is the only stat that stands out. If you did not include UE or Winners I would have a very hard time guessing who won since it's so even.
I ponder what's driving that ratio to typically be higher than your opponent. Certainly if you're a 3.0 and you play any players higher (3.25, 3.5) then your UE/Winner ratio will go up because in that scenario you'll be playing more consistent players and you'll try to go for more than you can produce. I get it! I think most people you play are not 3.0 so we can assign a certain amount of that to playing better players.
Yeah, I've been mentally and physically tired for most of the season I think. I'm just routinely missing shots that I should be routinely making. Part of it is lack of skill, and part of it is physical and mental fatigue. I played a bit better in the recent tournament against rated 3.0 and 3.25 guys than I did against the 4.0 guy I think. The 4.0 guy, by the way, hasn't been playing very much or very well lately. I would say he's about 3.5 now, if that.Since we can't really change an oppoent, let's focus on some general things that may or may not apply to that ratio.
- You've gone for "more" than you can reliably keep in the court (error by aggression)
- Not waiting for a good ball to go offensive but trying for a winner off a neutral rally ball (pump the patience)
- Mentally just zoning out (like when you're driving and realize you were not watching the road and realize you're a mile farther than you last remembered)
- Just wanting that point to be over and going for broke due to physical exhaustion (long rally)
- Trying to hit a normal rally ball to a safe zone but simply missing due to skill consistency
- Distraction from another court
- Delay in recognizing where to go as ball leaves opponent's racquet
- Setting up feet in sub-optimal place
Eh, my list is not all that great but I'm gonna tell you that EVERYONE does these during every match. Just last night I was in the third set 4-4 and I was hoping they would not hit to me. I was tired, mentally not there, and just wanted it to be over and that almost never happens. Still I screwed up the last two shots of the set to lose it. Although I was fully stretched out they were pretty easy. Grrrrrr.
from EOY Tourney said:Some points from each of my four matches at
the Tennis League Network 2013 End Of Year Tournament
(Nov 1 to Nov 3) at Crandon Park Tennis Center on Key
Biscayne in Miami. (Note the aerial geese attack
at 3:24 to 3:35)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Xz9_LA5Uu8
I would love to be a successful pusher. I'm just not capable of it. I'm not missing shots because I'm going for too much. The vast majority of shots I miss are just routine shots to stay in the rally. Or routine volleys. That is, they should be routine shots, but I'm missing them. Bad anticipation, bad recovery, bad footwork, bad prep in general, etc. Just lazy, loose, nonchalant playing. Half the time I don't even look at the ball. It's a wonder, really, that I hit any decent shots at all. Including serves.Anyway, we know how winning works -- make less errors than the guy on the other side of the net. Simple right? Guy with more patience to hit the center mass wins. That is provided both players are of equal skill but one chooses to play safe. But that kind of tennis does NOT appeal to a great many rec players who'd rather go for broke or try that tenth DTL winner only to have made 1 of 10 but remembers that "great" much to the detriment of having lost a few games for that one nice shot. See it every day.