IW R3 - Grigor Dimitrov vs Ernie Gulbis

I think the winner will be...

  • Gulbis in 2

    Votes: 11 18.0%
  • Gulbis in 3

    Votes: 16 26.2%
  • Dimitrov in 3

    Votes: 25 41.0%
  • Dimitrov in 2

    Votes: 9 14.8%

  • Total voters
    61

Duncan Bell

Hall of Fame
Match of the round!

After they were drawn together in Acapulco it felt like a nice rivalry was brewing, and now they've been drawn together in a grown-up competition.

Playing for the 3rd time ever, all 3 matches within a month.
Gulbis won in 2 in Rotterdam
Dimitrov won in 3 in Acapulco

Both players very popular about these parts, and 2014 so far has been a year of living up to hype - to some degree - for both of these players.

Fascinating match-up, I can't wait. The victor will have a very realistic shot of a semi final.
 

Team10

Hall of Fame
Cheering for Ernesto, but afraid if he wins now he will exit on Bautista :-/

No way, whoever wins this match is beating Bautista Agut, probably Gasquet/Isner too.

It's going to be a close match, I think 3 sets with Gulbis coming out on top.
 

Fiercer

Semi-Pro
Gulbis, easily.

All he has to do is hit to Dimitrov's backhand.

:lol:

I am sure he found it easy just hitting it to his backhand in Acapulco. You'd imagine someone like Murray would have won if Dimitrov was as simple as that.

However, to be fair, I think Gulbis will win if he does what he did in Rotterdam, i.e. 76% first serves in and 85% of those won. But if the stats are more like in Acapulco then I think Dimitrov will find a way to win.
 

Russeljones

Talk Tennis Guru
I think one of the bigger similarities between Dimitrov and Federer is how much they draw on their confidence in tense moments. Dimitrov is on a high and that might help him prevail where he previously would have stumbled. Just a little theory I have.
 

Duncan Bell

Hall of Fame
Gulbis made Rotterdam look so easy as he was GOATing his serve. He was is a different place.

Unless he can do that again, I think Dimitrov knows how to win - hit it flat to his forehand and don't give him time for his ridiculous backswing :)
 
M

monfed

Guest
Gulbis, easily.

All he has to do is hit to Dimitrov's backhand.

More stupidity from you. All your posts center around " hit to his BH", yea we get it ,Ralph is good at that. Your boy got owned in 2011 by a better player, deal with it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Cfidave

Professional
Gulbis had him in Acapulco, came down to two bad choices on shot selection. It will be close, but I think Gulbis is the better player when both are playing well.
 
M

monfed

Guest
Haha, lol at you thinking I'm a Nadal fan.

Ok whatever you say. Dimitrov's BH won't be under fire v/s Gulbis,thats for sure. Plus Dimi's BH held up great against Ralph at MC the most high bouncing surface on the planet so I'm sure he'll do just fine. :)
 

fecaleagle

Professional
why do you all think Gulbis is so sure for the win?
weird...

Gulbis is never "so sure for the win." That guy has screwed up more of my Major brackets than anybody on tour. I'm anticipating a third-set tiebreak, and hesitantly picking Gulby to win, but it could easily go either way.
 

Russeljones

Talk Tennis Guru
It's positive that such a match is drawing attention here. Proves TW is not only about Nadal, Federer, Djokovic and Murray.
 

Beryl

Hall of Fame
:lol:

I am sure he found it easy just hitting it to his backhand in Acapulco. You'd imagine someone like Murray would have won if Dimitrov was as simple as that.

However, to be fair, I think Gulbis will win if he does what he did in Rotterdam, i.e. 76% first serves in and 85% of those won. But if the stats are more like in Acapulco then I think Dimitrov will find a way to win.
Gulbis was a walking zombie in Acapulco, and even then he was 2 points away from winning that match.

And Gulbis has a much better backhand than Murray's. Dimitrov will struggle if he gets into many backhand rallies with Ernie.

I've got Gulbis in 2.
 

marc45

G.O.A.T.
@OP

"After they were drawn together in Acapulco it felt like a nice rivalry was brewing, and now they've been drawn together in a grown-up competition."

you think that's what they were thinking during rallies?..."can't wait until we're in a grown-up competition"...so different the lives of fans and players
 
N

Nathaniel_Near

Guest
@marc45,

Isn't it clear what the OP means.


1000 >>> 500, that's all his main point was.

He's a huge fan of Dimitrov, and isn't being disparaging.
 

Duncan Bell

Hall of Fame
@OP

"After they were drawn together in Acapulco it felt like a nice rivalry was brewing, and now they've been drawn together in a grown-up competition."

you think that's what they were thinking during rallies?..."can't wait until we're in a grown-up competition"...so different the lives of fans and players



@marc45,

Isn't it clear what the OP means.


1000 >>> 500, that's all his main point was.

He's a huge fan of Dimitrov, and isn't being disparaging.


Nathaniel's got my back - cheers bro. :)

Yeah - 500s are big cheese, we all know that. It's just cool that they're now facing each other at a 1000.
Grigor's my fav (male) pro - I'm not cutting; you made a pretty big leap to get from my comments to your conclusion.
 
Top