The 1953 Davis Cup Challenge Round: Australia 3, United States 2

Dan L

Professional
The importance of the Davis Cup at this time cannot be overstated.

Hoad's wins at the final should be sufficient to give him the number one ranking in singles for that year.

Hoad was 5 to 0 against Rosewall that year, and 2 to 0 against Trabert.

The Davis Cup final in 1953 was played during a Royal tour of Australia, and had the character of a year-end championship, with the top four players squaring off for all the marbles.
 

Dan L

Professional
In the Wimbledon book by John Barrett, it even says that Falkenburg was lucky to win the 1948 final against Bromwich.

A bit harsh to write that in a book, I thought - but obviously shows how close Bromwich was to winning W ( he had match points in 1948 ) and also proves that he was considered superior to his opponent.

Mind you, Falkenburg is now 88 and the 3rd oldest living male slam singles champ. He's gone into history, no matter the circumstances of his win.

Nice to see John Barrett deliver the Cincinnati Cup to Fed today.
 
Last edited:

Dan L

Professional
Here is excellent footage of this historic event on British Pathe, good on full-screen.

http://www.britishpathe.com/video/davis-cup-2/query/Seixas

Interesting, for this historic showdown at Forest Hills, where the U.S. Vice President Richard M. Nixon presented the trophies, and ten million American TV sets watched the color broadcast, the first national color broadcast of anything by NBC, the Australian doubles team consisted of Hoad and Hartwig.

Hopman was still saving Rosewall for singles only.

Hartwig in these video excerpts looks below Rosewall's level in doubles.
 
Last edited:

Dan L

Professional
Interesting, for this historic showdown at Forest Hills, where the U.S. Vice President Richard M. Nixon presented the trophies, and ten million American TV sets watched the color broadcast, the first national color broadcast of anything by NBC, the Australian doubles team consisted of Hoad and Hartwig.

Hopman was still saving Rosewall for singles only.

Hartwig in these video excerpts looks below Rosewall's level in doubles.

This was the broadcast Davis Cup final where Vice President Nixon presented the trophies, and stated that Hoad and Trabert "have shown us that tennis is not a game for sissies."

This event was important for the politicians.
 
Last edited:

don_budge

New User
1953 Davis Cup Final...USA vs. Australia

Yes, the status of the Davis Cup has changed, especially since the Open Era began in 1968. Nowadays players tend to focus on their own ambitions, which usually means doing well at the majors. And, of course, there is so much money in the sport now that a financial reward of some sort has to be part of any prize.
-----

Wonderful stuff...
 

Dan L

Professional
Here is the Hoad/Seixas match from the 1953 (mislabelled 1954 again) Davis Cup final.

Note the magnificent shots of Kooyong Stadium, the "Spiritual Home of Australian Tennis".

http://www.britishpathe.com/video/aussies-keep-davis-cup

During one exchange, Seixas is apparently knocked off his feet by one of Hoad's groundstrokes.

Unbelievable power.

Interesting to compare Seixas' form in this match against the same two players at Wimbledon in 1953 (see Hoad thread).
 

Dan L

Professional
From 1900 to 1968 DC was really so big and so special.

Thanks for the nice reading.

I think that Davis Cup has recently regained much of its importance...just witness the mass enthusiasm of the crowds.
In Canada, the live and television audiences went crazy over the recent win over Japan in Davis Cup.
 

Dan L

Professional
I think that Davis Cup has recently regained much of its importance...just witness the mass enthusiasm of the crowds.
In Canada, the live and television audiences went crazy over the recent win over Japan in Davis Cup.

Here is a link to the 1932 Davis Cup final, where Borotra put on a great show to win both his singles against Vines and Allison, at age 33.
This performance was similar in excitement to Hoad's great showing in 1953.

http://www.britishpathe.com/video/france-retains-the-davis-cup/query/Borotra
 

krosero

Legend
Here is a link to the 1932 Davis Cup final, where Borotra put on a great show to win both his singles against Vines and Allison, at age 33.
This performance was similar in excitement to Hoad's great showing in 1953.

http://www.britishpathe.com/video/france-retains-the-davis-cup/query/Borotra
Wow that's amazing, had no idea there was footage of that tie. Thanks for posting.

There's probably more to that footage (but who knows if it's survived).

Great story, that Davis Cup tie, probably deserves its own thread.
 

pc1

G.O.A.T.
Here is a great memo to the 1973 Australian Davis Cup squad, and the great success of that year.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hd_I4uqmxDk

It is interesting to find out where these players were during the 1953 Davis Cup final...Newcombe was in the stands.

Thanks Dan. That doubles match with Laver and Newcombe was to my fading memory the best doubles I've ever seen played.

Such a powerful Davis Cup team! A lot of people forget that Newcombe was actually the number one player on the team. It was a touch choice between Laver and Rosewall but Laver was chosen because of his great power. Laver easily proved the decision was correct.

I'm not convinced it was the best Davis Cup team since Laver and Rosewall were old but it's up there. I could see Australia in 1970 (if they were allowed to play) with near prime Laver, Newcombe, Roche and Rosewall as being a lot stronger. Other teams in the past and since that time could be comparable to the 1973 team.
 
Last edited:

Dan L

Professional
Here is a great memo to the 1973 Australian Davis Cup squad, and the great success of that year.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hd_I4uqmxDk

It is interesting to find out where these players were during the 1953 Davis Cup final...Newcombe was in the stands.

If memory serves, Newcombe attended the 1953 Davis Cup final with his father, sitting in the stands, and decided right then on a tennis career.
Laver and other juniors watched the matches from Hoad's parent's home on TV (?)
 

winstonlim8

Professional
Interesting to notice how aggressive Borotra was. I know they are only brief highlights, but most of the points show him attacking the net, despite it being on clay.

You are correct. Borotra preferred to attack from the net, even on slow clay. No dingdongpingpong from him, you can be sure. He was one of the earliest and greatest serve-and-volley exponents. He was known as the Bounding Basque because he hit so many winning volleys while leaping from one side to the other.
 
Last edited:

hoodjem

G.O.A.T.
Part III of V
“Trabert raised his play to a wonderful standard in the fourth set."

“Trabert played some fantastic shots, and through the early games of this set always held his service with greater ease than I did."

“Yet he kept hitting amazing shots. One I will always remember came during the ninth game with the score at 4-all. I hit a smash with tremendous power, and Tony took it on the full and played it back for a winner."

“However, in the tenth game, Trabert, down 15-30 on his own service, won three successive points, two with unbelievable strokes. At 30-all, he served down my forehand side, and I drove back down the sideline. He dove out and got it back, and I hit a backhand volley down the other side. Trabert ran across and hit a top-spin lob, the most difficult shot he could have hit for a winner. 40-30.

On the next shot I hammered a perfectly timed cross-court volley away from him; and he lunged and hit a drop-volley which just cleared the net and splashed on the grass for another amazing winner, which made it 5-all.
A nice read, particularly because Hoad gives much praise to Trabert.

Great competitors, but gentleman also.
 
Last edited:

Dan L

Professional
I think that Davis Cup has recently regained much of its importance...just witness the mass enthusiasm of the crowds.
In Canada, the live and television audiences went crazy over the recent win over Japan in Davis Cup.

In 1954, films of the 1953 Davis Cup final were shown in many sites in the U.S.A., and helped to build anticipation for the next two years' finals.
 

Dan L

Professional
In preparation for the 1954 Davis Cup final, the 1954 U.S. Doubles final at Forest Hills featured the two doubles teams in good form, with Trabert/Seixas winning in four sets, although Hoad hit an incredible behind-the-back half-volley to win a point.

In the Davis Cup doubles match, the U.S. team of Trabert/Seixas won in five sets.


http://www.oregonlive.com/the-spin-of-the-ball/index.ssf/2014/07/from_rod_laver_to_john_mcenroe.html

Good picture quality.

I would nominate this behind-the-back half-volley of Hoad as the best "behind" shot of all time.
 

Dan L

Professional
During the 1953 Davis Cup finals in Melbourne, Queen Elizabeth (who had just celebrated her Coronation that year) and Prince Philip were touring Australia, and took in the Davis Cup finals.

In addition, they were apparently given the task of presenting the Davis Cup player awards to the Australian team members.
Notice the puzzled side-glance the Queen gives to Hoad after he talks with her.


http://www.britishpathe.com/video/queen-in-victoria-1/query/Rosewall


The Queen also broke her long aversion to Wimbledon in 1957 to attend the finals and watch Hoad win the final over Cooper.
Her only other appearances at the Wimbledon finals were in 1962 to watch Laver win, and in 1977 for the Wimbledon centennial tournament.
 
Last edited:

Dan L

Professional
During the 1953 Davis Cup finals in Melbourne, Queen Elizabeth (who had just celebrated her Coronation that year) and Prince Philip were touring Australia, and took in the Davis Cup finals.

In addition, they were apparently given the task of presenting the Davis Cup player awards to the Australian team members.
Notice the puzzled side-glance the Queen gives to Hoad after he talks with her.


http://www.britishpathe.com/video/queen-in-victoria-1/query/Rosewall


The Queen also broke her long aversion to Wimbledon in 1957 to attend the finals and watch Hoad win the final over Cooper.
Her only other appearances at the Wimbledon finals were in 1962 to watch Laver win, and in 1977 for the Wimbledon centennial tournament.


From the appearance of the stadium, this is Kooyong, however, the sunshine suggests a day later than the final match of Rosewall/Seixas.
 

Dan L

Professional
Here is a great memo to the 1973 Australian Davis Cup squad, and the great success of that year.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hd_I4uqmxDk

It is interesting to find out where these players were during the 1953 Davis Cup final...Newcombe was in the stands.

The 1953 Davis Cup final was an inspiration to the juniors in the Aussie program, such as Laver and Emerson.

I think that I recall reading somewhere that Laver and Emerson were in Sydney at Hoad's parents' house watching the 1953 Davis Cup finals on television.

Here is Emerson against McKinley in the most anticipated match of 1964, the Davis Cup decider, and I remember that as a young player of 13, we were all talking about it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJYmGGwwSd8

It was probably after this match that Laver and Rosewall offered Emerson an $80,000 guarantee to turn pro, which Emerson turned down.
 
Last edited:

Dan L

Professional
Here is some remarkable footage of the 1924 Wimbledon championships, including the men's final between Borotra and Lacoste, won by Borotra.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioLSf1ZyD9k

Borotora was ahead of his time.

In the 1924 Wimbledon final, notice the presence of Queen Mary, the mother of the then King George V. Her grandson, the later George VI, would play in Wimbledon doubles.

Notice the physical resemblance between Queen Mary and the current Queen Elizabeth, her great grand-daughter, who appears in the Davis Cup ceremony cited above.
 
7

70sHollywood

Guest
During the 1953 Davis Cup finals in Melbourne, Queen Elizabeth (who had just celebrated her Coronation that year) and Prince Philip were touring Australia, and took in the Davis Cup finals.

In addition, they were apparently given the task of presenting the Davis Cup player awards to the Australian team members.
Notice the puzzled side-glance the Queen gives to Hoad after he talks with her.

I'm not sure that was a puzzled look. I reckon she may have fancied him! She only turns away when forced too, and she doesn't give Rosewall so much as a second glance.
 

Dan L

Professional
In the 1924 Wimbledon final, notice the presence of Queen Mary, the mother of the then King George V. Her grandson, the later George VI, would play in Wimbledon doubles.

Notice the physical resemblance between Queen Mary and the current Queen Elizabeth, her great grand-daughter, who appears in the Davis Cup ceremony cited above.

Sorry, I think that I got the generations wrong...Queen Mary would be the consort of King George V, the mother of George VI, and therefore the grandmother of the present Queen Elizabeth II....thus, the physical resemblance.

The great-grandmother of the current queen would have been Queen Alexandra, the mother-in-law of Queen Mary.

I HOPE that I have that right.
 

pc1

G.O.A.T.
Thanks Dan. That doubles match with Laver and Newcombe was to my fading memory the best doubles I've ever seen played.

Such a powerful Davis Cup team! A lot of people forget that Newcombe was actually the number one player on the team. It was a touch choice between Laver and Rosewall but Laver was chosen because of his great power. Laver easily proved the decision was correct.

I'm not convinced it was the best Davis Cup team since Laver and Rosewall were old but it's up there. I could see Australia in 1970 (if they were allowed to play) with near prime Laver, Newcombe, Roche and Rosewall as being a lot stronger. Other teams in the past and since that time could be comparable to the 1973 team.

There was an interview with the coach on why Fraser chose Laver over Rosewall for the second spot in singles on the 1973 Davis Cup team. Fraser pointed out that if he didn't pick the power player (Laver) he would have been giving up a natural advantage. There was even doubt if Laver would make the team but Laver defeated both Rosewall and Newk in a tournament late in the year to make the team! After that Fraser make imo the logical choice considering Laver's natural power game on that surface.
 
Last edited:

Dan L

Professional
There was an interview with the coach on why Fraser chose Laver over Rosewall for the second spot in singles on the 1973 Davis Cup team. Fraser pointed out that if he didn't pick the power player (Laver) he would have been giving up a natural advantage. There was even doubt if Laver would make the team but Laver defeated both Rosewall and Newk in a tournament late in the year to make the team! After that Fraser make imo the logical choice considering Laver's natural power game on that surface.

Where was Arthur Ashe?
 

pc1

G.O.A.T.
Where was Arthur Ashe?

I just looked in Arthur Ashe's book (Arthur Ashe-Portrait in Motion) for where he was in late November of 1973. Ashe was playing the South African Open. He reached the final against Connors. It was an historic moment since he was an African-American in South Africa in the finals. He also met with some important people like a powerful Zulu Chieftain also late in November.

In hindsight the best possible US team in 1973 would have been Connors, Ashe and Stan Smith for singles and Smith and Lutz for doubles. On paper this is a team that could defeat the 1973 Aussie squad. I probably would have had Connors play against Newcombe and Laver. I suppose Smith, being the higher ranked player would play over Ashe but that's close. The problem obviously is that Ashe always lost to Laver in those days.

Of course Connors wasn't going to play Davis Cup in those days.
 
Last edited:
7

70sHollywood

Guest
I just looked in Arthur Ashe's book (Arthur Ashe-Portrait in Motion) for where he was in late November of 1973. Ashe was playing the South African Open. He reached the final against Connors. It was an historic moment since he was an African-American in South Africa in the finals. He also met with some important people like a powerful Zulu Chieftain also late in November.

In hindsight the best possible US team in 1973 would have been Connors, Ashe and Stan Smith for singles and Smith and Lutz for doubles. On paper this is a team that could defeat the 1973 Aussie squad. I probably would have had Connors play against Newcombe and Laver. I suppose Smith, being the higher ranked player would play over Ashe but that's close. The problem obviously is that Ashe always lost to Laver in those days.

Of course Connors wasn't going to play Davis Cup in those days.

Well Ashe finished the year ranked number 10 whilst I think Gorman was number 11, so form wise there was little between them. Also, Gorman was coming off an impressive victory at the Stockholm Open. I think Gorman also had a winning record over Laver at that point, including that 71 Wimbledon QF where he straight-setted him. The Davis Cup match did go 5 sets, Gorman leading 2-1 at one point, so not a bad pick for playing Laver.

Would Smith have beaten Laver if they played the first (or second) rubber? He owned him that year, but by the time they met the tie was over.

Where was Lutz? I looked at his Davis Cup record and noticed he did not play between 1970 and 1975.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

kiki

Banned
I just looked in Arthur Ashe's book (Arthur Ashe-Portrait in Motion) for where he was in late November of 1973. Ashe was playing the South African Open. He reached the final against Connors. It was an historic moment since he was an African-American in South Africa in the finals. He also met with some important people like a powerful Zulu Chieftain also late in November.

In hindsight the best possible US team in 1973 would have been Connors, Ashe and Stan Smith for singles and Smith and Lutz for doubles. On paper this is a team that could defeat the 1973 Aussie squad. I probably would have had Connors play against Newcombe and Laver. I suppose Smith, being the higher ranked player would play over Ashe but that's close. The problem obviously is that Ashe always lost to Laver in those days.

Of course Connors wasn't going to play Davis Cup in those days.

Well, could have easily been the greatest DC final of the modern era.
 

pc1

G.O.A.T.
Well, could have easily been the greatest DC final of the modern era.

Probably. A young Connors against Laver in a big match. Wow! Not easy to call at this point. Connors' return may neutralize Laver's serve and volley somewhat.

Any ideas on who would win in late 1973 if you had to call it Kiki?
 
7

70sHollywood

Guest
I'm not convinced it was the best Davis Cup team since Laver and Rosewall were old but it's up there. I could see Australia in 1970 (if they were allowed to play) with near prime Laver, Newcombe, Roche and Rosewall as being a lot stronger. Other teams in the past and since that time could be comparable to the 1973 team.

I think both the 53 and 73 teams were strong but could have been a lot stronger a few years later/earlier.

69/70 - Laver, Rosewall, Newcombe, Roche versus
58/59 - Hoad, Rosewall, Sedgman, McGregor

Played at Kooyong - who wins?
 

kiki

Banned
Probably. A young Connors against Laver in a big match. Wow! Not easy to call at this point. Connors' return may neutralize Laver's serve and volley somewhat.

Any ideas on who would win in late 1973 if you had to call it Kiki?

Well, Stan Smith had had a great 72 and first half of 73 yet he lost to the two aussies at home.Connors lacked a bit of experience but had won SAF Open by beating Ashe, so he was very much in form and could make a dent on any of the two aussies.Ashe almost never beat either Laver or Newk in a big match.

I´d pick Connors and Smith for the singles and then I´d pick Ashe and Tanner ( Gorman would be out ) at doubs to counter the power and balance of Laver-Newcombe.This would also give an extra day to Smith, which would not be the case if he played doubs.That extra day may have made a difference, lets say, against an ageeing Laver who would have ALSO played doubles.I still think Australia would win it but it would have probably been far closer than it turned out to be.
 

kiki

Banned
The 1959 vs 1970 Australian teams face up? that would be almost impossible to tell.Two mighty shotmakers like Hoad vs Laver and two of the best ever S&V players like Sedgman vs Newcombe? Hoad and Rosewall or Sedgman and Mc Gregor vs Newcombe and Roche? I´d still give the edge to the 1950´s team if Rosewall could play himself.That is, 1959 Rosewall would most likely beat 1970 Rosewall.

Since this is not possible, any of the two teams would be able to beat the other...and any other team in history.Probably two of the strongest four teams of all time.The 1920´s French and the 1980´s Sweden team would be my other two.1970 Spain on clay would be possibly my fifth best team.
 
Last edited:

Dan L

Professional
The 1959 vs 1970 Australian teams face up? that would be almost impossible to tell.Two mighty shotmakers like Hod vs Laver and two of the best ever S&V players like Sedgman vs Newcombe? Hoad and Rosewall or Sedgman and Mc Gregor vs Newcombe and Roche? I´d still give the edge to the 1950´s team if Rosewall could play himself.That is, 1959 Rosewall would most likely beat 1970 Rosewall.

Since this is not possible, any of the two teams would be able to beat the other...and any other team in history.Probably two of the strongest four teams of all time.The 1920´s French and the 1980´s Sweden team would be my other two.1970 Spain on clay would be possibly my fifth best team.

All-time potential teams for Davis Cup?

Also Budge/Vines in late 1930's.
 

kiki

Banned
Yes, Budge and Vines together looks great.1984 Connors, Mac and Fleming ( with Arias as a sub) is also a great team.

If Kramer and Gonzales hadn´t turned pro, the US would have had an almost unbeatable team from 1948 to, at least, 1954.
 

urban

Legend
In 1973, i think, the Aussies would have beaten any US Team that year. Gorman is quite underrated today, and was Laver's nemesis, had beaten him at Wim in 1971. Laver, who came to form in late 1973, would have much preferred to play Ashe or an unexperienced Connors. Also the Team aspect is important: The Smith, Gorman, van Dillen Team had sharpened its skill, they had gone through the deathmarch at Bukarest in 1972, and had beaten some very strong teams in 1973. I think, that Ashe didn't want to join that stabile Champions Team in 1973, and Connors was always a disturbing maverick in team events.
By the way, in the Aetna World Cup, all the best Yankees and Aussies played a Team Event between 1970 and 1975, consisting of singles and double, and in each year, the Aussies prevailed. They excelled in Team events.
 
Last edited:
Top