"Geist" means "ghost" in German...perhaps we are dealing with a ghost writer?Geist tells me it's Rosewall.
It may be Kenny the best .... I would be happy ....Geist tells me it's Rosewall.
Well, from 70-74, Ken won 3 slams, reached three other finals, won 2 WCT titles. As for the 72 AO, Newk did compete and lost to Mal Anderson in the semis. Newk won 3 slams, 1 WCT. Smith won 2 slams, 1 WCT. Laver won 0 slams, reached 0 slam finals, lost 2 WCT finals to you know who. Of course he did win several one night stand matches on the TCC tour.Geist tells me it's Rosewall.
However, slam = slam = slam = slam, is a myth.Well, from 70-74, Ken won 3 slams, reached three other finals, won 2 WCT titles. As for the 72 AO, Newk did compete and lost to Mal Anderson in the semis. Newk won 3 slams, 1 WCT. Smith won 2 slams, 1 WCT. Laver won 0 slams, reached 0 slam finals, lost 2 WCT finals to you know who. Of course he did win several one night stand matches on the TCC tour.
Well, from 70-74, Ken won 3 slams, reached three other finals, won 2 WCT titles. As for the 72 AO, Newk did compete and lost to Mal Anderson in the semis. Newk won 3 slams, 1 WCT. Smith won 2 slams, 1 WCT. Laver won 0 slams, reached 0 slam finals, lost 2 WCT finals to you know who. Of course he did win several one night stand matches on the TCC tour.
Geist tells me it's Rosewall.
"Geist" means "ghost" in German...perhaps we are dealing with a ghost writer?
Well, from 70-74, Ken won 3 slams, reached three other finals, won 2 WCT titles. As for the 72 AO, Newk did compete and lost to Mal Anderson in the semis. Newk won 3 slams, 1 WCT. Smith won 2 slams, 1 WCT. Laver won 0 slams, reached 0 slam finals, lost 2 WCT finals to you know who. Of course he did win several one night stand matches on the TCC tour.
NATF, Your arrogance is even greater than Rosewall's backhand.
Geist is right. Rosewall was the best in that period. See Flink's world comparisons. See Rosewall's great achievements in that time.
Please tell me and Geist which player had a better balance!
Well, from 70-74, Ken won 3 slams, reached three other finals, won 2 WCT titles. As for the 72 AO, Newk did compete and lost to Mal Anderson in the semis. Newk won 3 slams, 1 WCT. Smith won 2 slams, 1 WCT. Laver won 0 slams, reached 0 slam finals, lost 2 WCT finals to you know who. Of course he did win several one night stand matches on the TCC tour.
Fact is though Newk did compete in the 72 AO, which Rosewall won. You are right that Newk has 4 slams to Ken's 3, but between 70-74 Ken was 35-39 years old. Ken though does have one more WCT in that period, so that when it comes to major wins they are even. Overall, I suppose Newk is #1, Ken- 2. In 70, Laver was best in the one night stands but nowhere in the slams, 70-74, and lost two WCT to Ken. Rosewall is ranked higher than Laver in 70 according to most experts, including Laver.Newk's 3rd slam is is considerably worth more than Rosewall's 3rd -- AO 72, which was a depleted slam.
Also Laver was the best player in 70 by far.
If we're including AO 72, include AO 73 as well for Newk. So Newk has 4 slams.
Though you may hate it, the Bud Collins Book shows that Rosewall out ranks Nastase in 70,71,72 and 74. During that period they only played once, in Cincinnati, which Rosewall won easily. During that period, Ken won 3 slams to Ille's 2. As for Grand Prix Masters, did Rosewall compete in that event? As for WCT, Ken won 2, Ille- 0 in that period.The mustachioed master, John Newcombe, was the top player of this period.
Ilie Nastase second.
Not sure who would come third - there are a few contenders.
Though you may hate it, the Bud Collins Book shows that Rosewall out ranks Nastase in 70,71,72 and 74. During that period they only played once, in Cincinnati, which Rosewall won easily. During that period, Ken won 3 slams to Ille's 2. As for Grand Prix Masters, did Rosewall compete in that event? As for WCT, Ken won 2, Ille- 0 in that period.
I will concede that, but Newk was lucky that Ken was 35-39 during that period.I don't hate it.
Main thing is Newcombe's supremacy in the early 1970s. Recognised by all objective tennis historians.
Fact is though Newk did compete in the 72 AO, which Rosewall won. You are right that Newk has 4 slams to Ken's 3, but between 70-74 Ken was 35-39 years old. Ken though does have one more WCT in that period, so that when it comes to major wins they are even. Overall, I suppose Newk is #1, Ken- 2. In 70, Laver was best in the one night stands but nowhere in the slams, 70-74, and lost two WCT to Ken. Rosewall is ranked higher than Laver in 70 according to most experts, including Laver.
Though you may hate it, the Bud Collins Book shows that Rosewall out ranks Nastase in 70,71,72 and 74. During that period they only played once, in Cincinnati, which Rosewall won easily. During that period, Ken won 3 slams to Ille's 2. As for Grand Prix Masters, did Rosewall compete in that event? As for WCT, Ken won 2, Ille- 0 in that period.
All you need to know.Though you may hate it, the Bud Collins Book shows that Rosewall out ranks Nastase in 70,71,72 and 74. During that period they only played once, in Cincinnati, which Rosewall won easily. During that period, Ken won 3 slams to Ille's 2. As for Grand Prix Masters, did Rosewall compete in that event? As for WCT, Ken won 2, Ille- 0 in that period.
1970-1974:1- Newcombe,2- Rosewall, 3-4 Smith or Nastase.thrust, Rosewall played in the 1970 Masters and finished third behind Smith and Laver.
Ken was lucky that Newk was still developing in the late 1960's, and was tired at Wimbledon in 1974, and....and....I will concede that, but Newk was lucky that Ken was 35-39 during that period.
Nastase won every two-bit tournament in that period....(yawn)Now going by the Richard Evans Book from 1978, Nastase won singles tournaments:
1970: 4
1971: 11
1972: 12
1973: 16
1974: 9
1975: 10
These are 62 singles titles in 6 years, 52 in 5 years 1970-1974. I doubt, that any other player won that amount of singles titles in this period. Maybe the number by Tennis Base now is eben higher.
TNow going by the Richard Evans Book from 1978, Nastase won singles tournaments:
1970: 4
1971: 11
1972: 12
1973: 16
1974: 9
1975: 10
These are 62 singles titles in 6 years, 52 in 5 years 1970-1974. I doubt, that any other player won that amount of singles titles in this period. Maybe the number by Tennis Base now is eben higher.
Pathetic and stupid statements, even by your standards. Newk was about 10 years younger than Rosewall, so in that you have taken great pleasure in trumping Newk's easy win over Rosewall in 71 after Ken had a very tough 5 set match the day before, it makes NO honest sense for you to complain that the much younger Newk was tired against a near 40 year old man. Also, in case you forgot we are talking about 70-74, not the late 60's in which Newk was already a two time slam champion. Again, I have already stated that Newcombe was, overall the best player in the 70-74 period, but not by as much as you probably think.Ken was lucky that Newk was still developing in the late 1960's, and was tired at Wimbledon in 1974, and....and....
But of course, Ken never lost a tournament when he was healthy, only crippled by injury, everyone knows that.
And course if Newk didn’t go beer drinking late night and did not have major injuries...Ken was lucky that Newk was still developing in the late 1960's, and was tired at Wimbledon in 1974, and....and....
But of course, Ken never lost a tournament when he was healthy, only crippled by injury, everyone knows that.
And course if Newk didn’t go beer drinking late night and had major injuries...
Subjectively I felt Newk at his best was better than MANY all time greats. Kramer compared players like Rosewall, Connors, Vilas, Laver, Ashe, Borg among others and felt Newk was perhaps the most complete player of all of them. I would think Kramer was comparing of all them at their top levels.
This was in 1976 so I think the views were of 1975 so at that point I’d rank Newk as more complete than Borg. Peak Borg I would say no.Kramer has crazy views.
Laver, Borg and Rosewall were definitely were definitely more complete than Newk.
Of course, that's it, Ken was an exhausted old man whenever he lost in the early 70's, he was okay when he won, but every time Ken lost there was some special reason....I get it.T
Pathetic and stupid statements, even by your standards. Newk was about 10 years younger than Rosewall, so in that you have taken great pleasure in trumping Newk's easy win over Rosewall in 71 after Ken had a very tough 5 set match the day before, it makes NO honest sense for you to complain that the much younger Newk was tired against a near 40 year old man. Also, in case you forgot we are talking about 70-74, not the late 60's in which Newk was already a two time slam champion. Again, I have already stated that Newcombe was, overall the best player in the 70-74 period, but not by as much as you probably think.
Ken was lucky that Newk was still developing in the late 1960's, and was tired at Wimbledon in 1974, and....and....
But of course, Ken never lost a tournament when he was healthy, only crippled by injury, everyone knows that.
T
Pathetic and stupid statements, even by your standards. Newk was about 10 years younger than Rosewall, so in that you have taken great pleasure in trumping Newk's easy win over Rosewall in 71 after Ken had a very tough 5 set match the day before, it makes NO honest sense for you to complain that the much younger Newk was tired against a near 40 year old man. Also, in case you forgot we are talking about 70-74, not the late 60's in which Newk was already a two time slam champion. Again, I have already stated that Newcombe was, overall the best player in the 70-74 period, but not by as much as you probably think.
Maybe it was already a thread so ...
I do not remember.
... the first part of 70 years; the second part of 70 years (1975-1979) is easy: Borg.
Rosewall won only 6:
8 14 February 1970 Hollywood Pro Championships (United States) Clay Andrés Gimeno 3–6, 6–2, 3–6, 7–6, 6–3
9 22 February 1970 Corpus Christi / WCT South Texas Pro (United States)2 Hard John Newcombe 6–2, 6–0
10 19 June 1970 Eastbourne Rothmans Open (United Kingdom)2 Grass Bob Hewitt 6–2, 6–1
11 10 July 1970 Newport Green Shield Welsh Open (United Kingdom)2 Grass John Newcombe 6–4, 6–4
12 26 July 1970 Cincinnati Western Championships (United States)2 Clay Cliff Richey 7–9, 9–7, 8–6
13 13 September 1970 U.S. Open, Forest Hills (United States)2 Grass Tony Roche 2–6, 6–4, 7–6, 6–3
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Rosewall_career_statistics
Newk won only 3 :
Winner 7. 1970 St. Louis WCT, U.S. Carpet Andrés Gimeno Roy Emerson
Rod Laver 6–4, 6–0
Winner 8. 1970 Wimbledon, London Grass Tony Roche Ken Rosewall
Fred Stolle 10–8, 6–3, 6–1
Winner 9. 1970 Louisville, U.S. Hard Tony Roche Roy Emerson
Rod Laver 8–6, 5–7, 6–4
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Newcombe_career_statistics
The one and only reason why Laver was not ranked #1 was because he under-performed at Wimbledon and USO, going out early.
Even if you penalize him more than what we have now (to keep in touch with the importance given to them at those times), given the rest of the year, there's no way Laver shouldn't be ranked #1 in 1970.
Fact is though Newk did compete in the 72 AO, which Rosewall won. You are right that Newk has 4 slams to Ken's 3, but between 70-74 Ken was 35-39 years old. Ken though does have one more WCT in that period, so that when it comes to major wins they are even. Overall, I suppose Newk is #1, Ken- 2. In 70, Laver was best in the one night stands but nowhere in the slams, 70-74, and lost two WCT to Ken. Rosewall is ranked higher than Laver in 70 according to most experts, including Laver.
Of course, that's it, Ken was an exhausted old man whenever he lost in the early 70's, he was okay when he won, but every time Ken lost there was some special reason....I get it.
70'-71' is easy, Laver.
72' - 74' Smith, Nastase, Newcombe, depending on the alignment of the stars, then Connors.
abmk, I don't understand why you give us these lists. We know these statistics. (But your Newcombe stats are wrong!). I also don't understand your conclusion. Laver was not ranked among the top 2 by most experts because of his terrible performance when it mostly mattered.
This was in 1976 so I think the views were of 1975 so at that point I’d rank Newk as more complete than Borg. Peak Borg I would say no.
I’m honestly not sure Rosewall was more COMPLETE than Newk if you compare them at their best levels. The key element to me is that Newcombe had the far superior service. He also had clearly superior forehand but with a clearly inferior backhand. Ken was a superior mover but Newcombe had good anticipation.
The volleys were close and stamina I’d rank Newk as better.
Newk was in many ways similar to Sampras.
Of course for career Rosewall wins easily.
I’m think Kramer wasn’t saying Newk was the best player of that bunch but the one with the least weaknesses.
And yes Kramer did have odd views at times.
Agree with you.you missed that Rosewall had a considerably superior return to Newk.
As far as Newk and Sampras are concerned, many similarities yes, but Sampras was a considerably better mover (cat-like).
The Newk rating over Borg in 75 makes complete sense, I agree, but Laver ? Nope.
I guess I’m influenced when I’ve seen how solid Newk was in matches against peak Connors, young Borg, peak Ashe and Smith in watching him in person.you missed that Rosewall had a considerably superior return to Newk.
As far as Newk and Sampras are concerned, many similarities yes, but Sampras was a considerably better mover (cat-like).
The Newk rating over Borg in 75 makes complete sense, I agree, but Laver ? Nope.
This was in 1976 so I think the views were of 1975 so at that point I’d rank Newk as more complete than Borg. Peak Borg I would say no.
I’m honestly not sure Rosewall was more COMPLETE than Newk if you compare them at their best levels. The key element to me is that Newcombe had the far superior service. He also had clearly superior forehand but with a clearly inferior backhand. Ken was a superior mover but Newcombe had good anticipation.
The volleys were close and stamina I’d rank Newk as better.
Newk was in many ways similar to Sampras.
Of course for career Rosewall wins easily.
I’m think Kramer wasn’t saying Newk was the best player of that bunch but the one with the least weaknesses.
And yes Kramer did have odd views at times.
and those experts were wrong for 1970.
apart from the 2 most important tournaments, Wimby and USO..Rod did so much better elsewhere than Rosewall and Newk, it wasn't even remotely close.
He's #1 clearly for 1970.
For a sensible ranking, you can penalize Laver heavily for those performances at Wimby and USO, but can't disqualify him. Even with a heavy penalty for under-performance in those 2 tournaments, he'd still be far and away #1 in 1970.
As I have explained many months ago, Laver could have won 39 tournaments (instead of 15) in 1970 and yet would most probably not have gotten the No.1 place by the experts. The method of ranking was as it was back then.
You have not corrected your wrong Newcombe stats.
I guess I’m influenced when I’ve seen how solid Newk was in matches against peak Connors, young Borg, peak Ashe and Smith in watching him in person.