1970-1974 who was the best?

KG1965

Legend
Maybe it was already a thread so ...
I do not remember.

... the first part of 70 years; the second part of 70 years (1975-1979) is easy: Borg.

5116992_orig.jpg
australian-tennis-player-john-newcombe-in-action-against-stan-smith-picture-id75873000
162009423.jpg
a7b9b9bb0b3fe9289ae977f59e831d2f
rosewall+forest+hills.JPG
 

thrust

Legend
Geist tells me it's Rosewall.
Well, from 70-74, Ken won 3 slams, reached three other finals, won 2 WCT titles. As for the 72 AO, Newk did compete and lost to Mal Anderson in the semis. Newk won 3 slams, 1 WCT. Smith won 2 slams, 1 WCT. Laver won 0 slams, reached 0 slam finals, lost 2 WCT finals to you know who. Of course he did win several one night stand matches on the TCC tour.
 

Dan Lobb

G.O.A.T.
Well, from 70-74, Ken won 3 slams, reached three other finals, won 2 WCT titles. As for the 72 AO, Newk did compete and lost to Mal Anderson in the semis. Newk won 3 slams, 1 WCT. Smith won 2 slams, 1 WCT. Laver won 0 slams, reached 0 slam finals, lost 2 WCT finals to you know who. Of course he did win several one night stand matches on the TCC tour.
However, slam = slam = slam = slam, is a myth.

Some slams are more important than others.
 

abmk

Bionic Poster
Well, from 70-74, Ken won 3 slams, reached three other finals, won 2 WCT titles. As for the 72 AO, Newk did compete and lost to Mal Anderson in the semis. Newk won 3 slams, 1 WCT. Smith won 2 slams, 1 WCT. Laver won 0 slams, reached 0 slam finals, lost 2 WCT finals to you know who. Of course he did win several one night stand matches on the TCC tour.

Newk's 3rd slam is is considerably worth more than Rosewall's 3rd -- AO 72, which was a depleted slam.

Also Laver was the best player in 70 by far.

If we're including AO 72, include AO 73 as well for Newk. So Newk has 4 slams. ;)
 
Last edited:

BobbyOne

G.O.A.T.
Geist tells me it's Rosewall.

NATF, Your arrogance aand insulting skills are even greater than Rosewall's backhand.

Geist is right. Rosewall was the best in that period. See Flink's world comparisons. See Rosewall's great achievements in that time.

Please tell me and Geist which player had a better balance!
 
Last edited:

BobbyOne

G.O.A.T.
Well, from 70-74, Ken won 3 slams, reached three other finals, won 2 WCT titles. As for the 72 AO, Newk did compete and lost to Mal Anderson in the semis. Newk won 3 slams, 1 WCT. Smith won 2 slams, 1 WCT. Laver won 0 slams, reached 0 slam finals, lost 2 WCT finals to you know who. Of course he did win several one night stand matches on the TCC tour.

thrust, You are right but Anderson beat Newcombe in the QFs.
 

NatF

Bionic Poster
NATF, Your arrogance is even greater than Rosewall's backhand.

Geist is right. Rosewall was the best in that period. See Flink's world comparisons. See Rosewall's great achievements in that time.

Please tell me and Geist which player had a better balance!

I think Newcombe was the best.
 

NatF

Bionic Poster
Well, from 70-74, Ken won 3 slams, reached three other finals, won 2 WCT titles. As for the 72 AO, Newk did compete and lost to Mal Anderson in the semis. Newk won 3 slams, 1 WCT. Smith won 2 slams, 1 WCT. Laver won 0 slams, reached 0 slam finals, lost 2 WCT finals to you know who. Of course he did win several one night stand matches on the TCC tour.

If you include the AO 1972 for Rosewall you should include the AO 1973 for Newcombe. Newcombe's slam titles have to each be valued more highly than Rosewall's AO 1971 as well which didn't have the same status as Wimbledon or the USO. Newcombe was clearly the best IMO.
 

urban

Legend
If you look at majors, Newombe comes high. For the overall play, you could also make a case for Nastase. In the Richard Evans book on Nastase, McCauley made the stats section. Overall he has probably the most tournament and match wins in that period. He didn't play the WCT circuit uintil 1974 however, but the Grand Prix circuit, but won two significant majors, Forest Hills 1972 and French open 1973, and 4 Masters till 1975.
 

thrust

Legend
Newk's 3rd slam is is considerably worth more than Rosewall's 3rd -- AO 72, which was a depleted slam.

Also Laver was the best player in 70 by far.

If we're including AO 72, include AO 73 as well for Newk. So Newk has 4 slams. ;)
Fact is though Newk did compete in the 72 AO, which Rosewall won. You are right that Newk has 4 slams to Ken's 3, but between 70-74 Ken was 35-39 years old. Ken though does have one more WCT in that period, so that when it comes to major wins they are even. Overall, I suppose Newk is #1, Ken- 2. In 70, Laver was best in the one night stands but nowhere in the slams, 70-74, and lost two WCT to Ken. Rosewall is ranked higher than Laver in 70 according to most experts, including Laver.
 

thrust

Legend
The mustachioed master, John Newcombe, was the top player of this period.

Ilie Nastase second.

Not sure who would come third - there are a few contenders.

:cool:
Though you may hate it, the Bud Collins Book shows that Rosewall out ranks Nastase in 70,71,72 and 74. During that period they only played once, in Cincinnati, which Rosewall won easily. During that period, Ken won 3 slams to Ille's 2. As for Grand Prix Masters, did Rosewall compete in that event? As for WCT, Ken won 2, Ille- 0 in that period.
 

Phoenix1983

G.O.A.T.
Though you may hate it, the Bud Collins Book shows that Rosewall out ranks Nastase in 70,71,72 and 74. During that period they only played once, in Cincinnati, which Rosewall won easily. During that period, Ken won 3 slams to Ille's 2. As for Grand Prix Masters, did Rosewall compete in that event? As for WCT, Ken won 2, Ille- 0 in that period.

I don't hate it.

Main thing is Newcombe's supremacy in the early 1970s. Recognised by all objective tennis historians.

:cool:
 

BobbyOne

G.O.A.T.
Fact is though Newk did compete in the 72 AO, which Rosewall won. You are right that Newk has 4 slams to Ken's 3, but between 70-74 Ken was 35-39 years old. Ken though does have one more WCT in that period, so that when it comes to major wins they are even. Overall, I suppose Newk is #1, Ken- 2. In 70, Laver was best in the one night stands but nowhere in the slams, 70-74, and lost two WCT to Ken. Rosewall is ranked higher than Laver in 70 according to most experts, including Laver.

thrust, Rosewall also has more big SFs than Newcombe plus has a positive balance against Newk in direct big confrontations. Thus a slight advantage for Muscles. Newcombe leads at tournament wins though.
 

BobbyOne

G.O.A.T.
Though you may hate it, the Bud Collins Book shows that Rosewall out ranks Nastase in 70,71,72 and 74. During that period they only played once, in Cincinnati, which Rosewall won easily. During that period, Ken won 3 slams to Ille's 2. As for Grand Prix Masters, did Rosewall compete in that event? As for WCT, Ken won 2, Ille- 0 in that period.

thrust, Rosewall played in the 1970 Masters and finished third behind Smith and Laver.
 

jaggy

Talk Tennis Guru
Though you may hate it, the Bud Collins Book shows that Rosewall out ranks Nastase in 70,71,72 and 74. During that period they only played once, in Cincinnati, which Rosewall won easily. During that period, Ken won 3 slams to Ille's 2. As for Grand Prix Masters, did Rosewall compete in that event? As for WCT, Ken won 2, Ille- 0 in that period.
All you need to know.
 

urban

Legend
Now going by the Richard Evans Book from 1978, Nastase won singles tournaments:
1970: 4
1971: 11
1972: 12
1973: 16
1974: 9
1975: 10
These are 62 singles titles in 6 years, 52 in 5 years 1970-1974. I doubt, that any other player won that amount of singles titles in this period. Maybe the number by Tennis Base now is eben higher.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pc1

Dan Lobb

G.O.A.T.
I will concede that, but Newk was lucky that Ken was 35-39 during that period.
Ken was lucky that Newk was still developing in the late 1960's, and was tired at Wimbledon in 1974, and....and....

But of course, Ken never lost a tournament when he was healthy, only crippled by injury, everyone knows that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pc1

Dan Lobb

G.O.A.T.
Now going by the Richard Evans Book from 1978, Nastase won singles tournaments:
1970: 4
1971: 11
1972: 12
1973: 16
1974: 9
1975: 10
These are 62 singles titles in 6 years, 52 in 5 years 1970-1974. I doubt, that any other player won that amount of singles titles in this period. Maybe the number by Tennis Base now is eben higher.
Nastase won every two-bit tournament in that period....(yawn)
 

thrust

Legend
Now going by the Richard Evans Book from 1978, Nastase won singles tournaments:
1970: 4
1971: 11
1972: 12
1973: 16
1974: 9
1975: 10
These are 62 singles titles in 6 years, 52 in 5 years 1970-1974. I doubt, that any other player won that amount of singles titles in this period. Maybe the number by Tennis Base now is eben higher.
T
Ken was lucky that Newk was still developing in the late 1960's, and was tired at Wimbledon in 1974, and....and....

But of course, Ken never lost a tournament when he was healthy, only crippled by injury, everyone knows that.
Pathetic and stupid statements, even by your standards. Newk was about 10 years younger than Rosewall, so in that you have taken great pleasure in trumping Newk's easy win over Rosewall in 71 after Ken had a very tough 5 set match the day before, it makes NO honest sense for you to complain that the much younger Newk was tired against a near 40 year old man. Also, in case you forgot we are talking about 70-74, not the late 60's in which Newk was already a two time slam champion. Again, I have already stated that Newcombe was, overall the best player in the 70-74 period, but not by as much as you probably think.
 

abmk

Bionic Poster
Laver won all of these tournaments in 1970. Only TCC consisted of one night stands.

29. 155. 2 February 1970 *Philadelphia Indoor Open WCT, Pennsylvania, U.S. (2) Carpet Tony Roche (5) 6–3, 8–6, 6–2
30. 156. 16 March 1970 *Dunlop Slazenger International WCT, Sydney Carpet Ken Rosewall (9) 3–6, 6–2, 3–6, 6–2, 6–3
31. 157. 30 March 1970 *South African Open, Johannesburg (2) Hard Frew McMillan 4–6, 6–2, 6–1, 6–2
32. 158. 25 May 1970 *Rawlings Classic WCT, Saint Louis, Missouri, U.S. (2) Carpet Ken Rosewall (10) 6–1, 6–4
33. 159. 15 June 1970 *Rothman's Open, Queen's Club, London (2) Grass John Newcombe (5) 6–4, 6–3
34. 160. 16 July 1970 (final) Tennis Champions Classic, Madison Square Garden, New York (final) Indoor Ken Rosewall (11) 6–4, 6–3, 6–3
35. 161. 29 July 1970 *First National Classic, Louisville, Kentucky, U.S. Clay John Newcombe (6) 6–3, 6–3
36. 162. 10 August 1970 Bretton Woods (4 man), U.S. Clay Roy Emerson (2) 6–3, 6–3
37. 163. 10 August 1970 *Rothman's Canadian Open, Toronto Clay Roger Taylor (2) 6–0, 4–6, 6–3
38. 164. 17 August 1970 *National Invitation Tournament WCT, Fort Worth, Texas, U.S. (3) Hard Roy Emerson (3) 6–3, 7–5
39. 165. 24 August 1970 *Marlboro Open, South Orange, New Jersey, U.S. (2) Grass Bob Carmichael 6–4, 6–2, 6–2
40. 166. 21 September 1970 *Pepsi Pacific Southwest Open, Los Angeles, U.S. (2) Hard John Newcombe (7) 4–6, 6–4, 7–6(7–5)
41. 167. 28 September 1970 *Rothman's International WCT, Vancouver, Canada Carpet Roy Emerson (4) 6–2, 6–1, 6–2
42. 168. ?? October 1970 Invitational Round Robin (4-man), Berlin, Bonn, & Saarbrücken, West Germany Carpet Tom Okker (finished 2nd) N/A
43. 169. 16 November 1970 *Embassy British Indoor Championships, Wembley Arena, London (5) Carpet Cliff Richey 6–3, 6–4, 7–5

15 in total, many of these were important ones.
 

abmk

Bionic Poster
Rosewall won only 6:

8 14 February 1970 Hollywood Pro Championships (United States) Clay Andrés Gimeno 3–6, 6–2, 3–6, 7–6, 6–3
9 22 February 1970 Corpus Christi / WCT South Texas Pro (United States)2 Hard John Newcombe 6–2, 6–0
10 19 June 1970 Eastbourne Rothmans Open (United Kingdom)2 Grass Bob Hewitt 6–2, 6–1
11 10 July 1970 Newport Green Shield Welsh Open (United Kingdom)2 Grass John Newcombe 6–4, 6–4
12 26 July 1970 Cincinnati Western Championships (United States)2 Clay Cliff Richey 7–9, 9–7, 8–6
13 13 September 1970 U.S. Open, Forest Hills (United States)2 Grass Tony Roche 2–6, 6–4, 7–6, 6–3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Rosewall_career_statistics

Newk won only 3 :

Winner 4. 1970 Casablanca WCT, Morocco Other Andrés Gimeno 6–4, 6–4, 6–4
Winner 5. 1970 Wimbledon, London Grass Ken Rosewall 5–7, 6–3, 6–3, 3–6, 6–1
Winner 6. 1970 Hoylake, U.K. Grass Owen Davidson 4–6, 9–7, 6–4

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Newcombe_career_statistics

The one and only reason why Laver was not ranked #1 was because he under-performed at Wimbledon and USO, going out early.

Even if you penalize him more than what we have now (to keep in touch with the importance given to them at those times), given the rest of the year, there's no way Laver shouldn't be ranked #1 in 1970.
 
Last edited:

pc1

G.O.A.T.
Ken was lucky that Newk was still developing in the late 1960's, and was tired at Wimbledon in 1974, and....and....

But of course, Ken never lost a tournament when he was healthy, only crippled by injury, everyone knows that.
And course if Newk didn’t go beer drinking late night and did not have major injuries...

Subjectively I felt Newk at his best was better than MANY all time greats. Kramer compared players like Rosewall, Connors, Vilas, Laver, Ashe, Borg among others and felt Newk was perhaps the most complete player of all of them. I would think Kramer was comparing of all them at their top levels.

I may not necessarily agree but it is something to be considered.

I felt Newk at his best was awesome.
 
Last edited:

abmk

Bionic Poster
And course if Newk didn’t go beer drinking late night and had major injuries...

Subjectively I felt Newk at his best was better than MANY all time greats. Kramer compared players like Rosewall, Connors, Vilas, Laver, Ashe, Borg among others and felt Newk was perhaps the most complete player of all of them. I would think Kramer was comparing of all them at their top levels.

Kramer has crazy views.

Laver, Borg and Rosewall were definitely were definitely more complete than Newk, the first 2 guys in particular.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pc1

pc1

G.O.A.T.
Kramer has crazy views.

Laver, Borg and Rosewall were definitely were definitely more complete than Newk.
This was in 1976 so I think the views were of 1975 so at that point I’d rank Newk as more complete than Borg. Peak Borg I would say no.

I’m honestly not sure Rosewall was more COMPLETE than Newk if you compare them at their best levels. The key element to me is that Newcombe had the far superior service. He also had clearly superior forehand but with a clearly inferior backhand. Ken was a superior mover but Newcombe had good anticipation.

The volleys were close and stamina I’d rank Newk as better.

Newk was in many ways similar to Sampras.

Of course for career Rosewall wins easily.

I’m think Kramer wasn’t saying Newk was the best player of that bunch but the one with the least weaknesses.

And yes Kramer did have odd views at times.
 

Dan Lobb

G.O.A.T.
T

Pathetic and stupid statements, even by your standards. Newk was about 10 years younger than Rosewall, so in that you have taken great pleasure in trumping Newk's easy win over Rosewall in 71 after Ken had a very tough 5 set match the day before, it makes NO honest sense for you to complain that the much younger Newk was tired against a near 40 year old man. Also, in case you forgot we are talking about 70-74, not the late 60's in which Newk was already a two time slam champion. Again, I have already stated that Newcombe was, overall the best player in the 70-74 period, but not by as much as you probably think.
Of course, that's it, Ken was an exhausted old man whenever he lost in the early 70's, he was okay when he won, but every time Ken lost there was some special reason....I get it.
 

BobbyOne

G.O.A.T.
Ken was lucky that Newk was still developing in the late 1960's, and was tired at Wimbledon in 1974, and....and....

But of course, Ken never lost a tournament when he was healthy, only crippled by injury, everyone knows that.

Lobb, YOU know nothing. But you do know that Newcombe was "tired" at Wimbledon...
 

BobbyOne

G.O.A.T.
T

Pathetic and stupid statements, even by your standards. Newk was about 10 years younger than Rosewall, so in that you have taken great pleasure in trumping Newk's easy win over Rosewall in 71 after Ken had a very tough 5 set match the day before, it makes NO honest sense for you to complain that the much younger Newk was tired against a near 40 year old man. Also, in case you forgot we are talking about 70-74, not the late 60's in which Newk was already a two time slam champion. Again, I have already stated that Newcombe was, overall the best player in the 70-74 period, but not by as much as you probably think.

thrust, I especially like your golden first sentence.

Of course there was no reason for Newcombe to be tired at Wimbledon. He won Dallas on May,12. Wimbledon was played at end-June/early July. Rosewall had a tough match in the round before their QF match (against Tanner) while Newcombe had a clear win over Van Dillen.
 

Limpinhitter

G.O.A.T.
Maybe it was already a thread so ...
I do not remember.

... the first part of 70 years; the second part of 70 years (1975-1979) is easy: Borg.

5116992_orig.jpg
australian-tennis-player-john-newcombe-in-action-against-stan-smith-picture-id75873000
162009423.jpg
a7b9b9bb0b3fe9289ae977f59e831d2f
rosewall+forest+hills.JPG

70'-71' is easy, Laver.

72' - 74' Smith, Nastase, Newcombe, depending on the alignment of the stars, then Connors.
 

BobbyOne

G.O.A.T.
Rosewall won only 6:

8 14 February 1970 Hollywood Pro Championships (United States) Clay Andrés Gimeno 3–6, 6–2, 3–6, 7–6, 6–3
9 22 February 1970 Corpus Christi / WCT South Texas Pro (United States)2 Hard John Newcombe 6–2, 6–0
10 19 June 1970 Eastbourne Rothmans Open (United Kingdom)2 Grass Bob Hewitt 6–2, 6–1
11 10 July 1970 Newport Green Shield Welsh Open (United Kingdom)2 Grass John Newcombe 6–4, 6–4
12 26 July 1970 Cincinnati Western Championships (United States)2 Clay Cliff Richey 7–9, 9–7, 8–6
13 13 September 1970 U.S. Open, Forest Hills (United States)2 Grass Tony Roche 2–6, 6–4, 7–6, 6–3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Rosewall_career_statistics

Newk won only 3 :

Winner 7. 1970 St. Louis WCT, U.S. Carpet Andrés Gimeno Roy Emerson
Rod Laver 6–4, 6–0
Winner 8. 1970 Wimbledon, London Grass Tony Roche Ken Rosewall
Fred Stolle 10–8, 6–3, 6–1
Winner 9. 1970 Louisville, U.S. Hard Tony Roche Roy Emerson
Rod Laver 8–6, 5–7, 6–4

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Newcombe_career_statistics

The one and only reason why Laver was not ranked #1 was because he under-performed at Wimbledon and USO, going out early.

Even if you penalize him more than what we have now (to keep in touch with the importance given to them at those times), given the rest of the year, there's no way Laver shouldn't be ranked #1 in 1970.

abmk, I don't understand why you give us these lists. We know these statistics. (But your Newcombe stats are wrong!). I also don't understand your conclusion. Laver was not ranked among the top 2 by most experts because of his terrible performance when it mostly mattered.
 

Limpinhitter

G.O.A.T.
Fact is though Newk did compete in the 72 AO, which Rosewall won. You are right that Newk has 4 slams to Ken's 3, but between 70-74 Ken was 35-39 years old. Ken though does have one more WCT in that period, so that when it comes to major wins they are even. Overall, I suppose Newk is #1, Ken- 2. In 70, Laver was best in the one night stands but nowhere in the slams, 70-74, and lost two WCT to Ken. Rosewall is ranked higher than Laver in 70 according to most experts, including Laver.

The question is not who was the best player from 70' - 74' for his age. The quesiton is, who was the best player.
 

BobbyOne

G.O.A.T.
Of course, that's it, Ken was an exhausted old man whenever he lost in the early 70's, he was okay when he won, but every time Ken lost there was some special reason....I get it.

Lobb, I must contradict a bit, alas! You NEVER get it! You never get anything! Please write about music!
 
Last edited:

abmk

Bionic Poster
abmk, I don't understand why you give us these lists. We know these statistics. (But your Newcombe stats are wrong!). I also don't understand your conclusion. Laver was not ranked among the top 2 by most experts because of his terrible performance when it mostly mattered.

and those experts were wrong for 1970.
apart from the 2 most important tournaments, Wimby and USO..Rod did so much better elsewhere than Rosewall and Newk, it wasn't even remotely close.
He's #1 clearly for 1970.

For a sensible ranking, you can penalize Laver heavily for those performances at Wimby and USO, but can't disqualify him. Even with a heavy penalty for under-performance in those 2 tournaments, he'd still be far and away #1 in 1970.
 

abmk

Bionic Poster
This was in 1976 so I think the views were of 1975 so at that point I’d rank Newk as more complete than Borg. Peak Borg I would say no.

I’m honestly not sure Rosewall was more COMPLETE than Newk if you compare them at their best levels. The key element to me is that Newcombe had the far superior service. He also had clearly superior forehand but with a clearly inferior backhand. Ken was a superior mover but Newcombe had good anticipation.

The volleys were close and stamina I’d rank Newk as better.

Newk was in many ways similar to Sampras.

Of course for career Rosewall wins easily.

I’m think Kramer wasn’t saying Newk was the best player of that bunch but the one with the least weaknesses.

And yes Kramer did have odd views at times.

you missed that Rosewall had a considerably superior return to Newk.

As far as Newk and Sampras are concerned, many similarities yes, but Sampras was a considerably better mover (cat-like).

The Newk rating over Borg in 75 makes complete sense, I agree, but Laver ? Nope.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pc1

pc1

G.O.A.T.
you missed that Rosewall had a considerably superior return to Newk.

As far as Newk and Sampras are concerned, many similarities yes, but Sampras was a considerably better mover (cat-like).

The Newk rating over Borg in 75 makes complete sense, I agree, but Laver ? Nope.
Agree with you.

I will say that Newk’s return was very good but Rosewall had a clearly better return.
 
Last edited:

pc1

G.O.A.T.
you missed that Rosewall had a considerably superior return to Newk.

As far as Newk and Sampras are concerned, many similarities yes, but Sampras was a considerably better mover (cat-like).

The Newk rating over Borg in 75 makes complete sense, I agree, but Laver ? Nope.
I guess I’m influenced when I’ve seen how solid Newk was in matches against peak Connors, young Borg, peak Ashe and Smith in watching him in person.
 
This was in 1976 so I think the views were of 1975 so at that point I’d rank Newk as more complete than Borg. Peak Borg I would say no.

I’m honestly not sure Rosewall was more COMPLETE than Newk if you compare them at their best levels. The key element to me is that Newcombe had the far superior service. He also had clearly superior forehand but with a clearly inferior backhand. Ken was a superior mover but Newcombe had good anticipation.

The volleys were close and stamina I’d rank Newk as better.

Newk was in many ways similar to Sampras.

Of course for career Rosewall wins easily.

I’m think Kramer wasn’t saying Newk was the best player of that bunch but the one with the least weaknesses.

And yes Kramer did have odd views at times.

I agree with your views on Newcombe and the comparison with Sampras is a good one.
The video I have posted below is off-topic, except for this observation from the comm at 33:00.

"5-4 and this is where the champions can put the hammer down. I know, it has been said to me, that John Newcombe was probably the best player of all time to be able to close a match out, or close a set out."

Another thing Newk and Sampras had in common, arguably the most important one.

 

BobbyOne

G.O.A.T.
and those experts were wrong for 1970.
apart from the 2 most important tournaments, Wimby and USO..Rod did so much better elsewhere than Rosewall and Newk, it wasn't even remotely close.
He's #1 clearly for 1970.

For a sensible ranking, you can penalize Laver heavily for those performances at Wimby and USO, but can't disqualify him. Even with a heavy penalty for under-performance in those 2 tournaments, he'd still be far and away #1 in 1970.

As I have explained many months ago, Laver could have won 39 tournaments (instead of 15) in 1970 and yet would most probably not have gotten the No.1 place by the experts. The method of ranking was as it was back then.

You have not corrected your wrong Newcombe stats.
 

abmk

Bionic Poster
As I have explained many months ago, Laver could have won 39 tournaments (instead of 15) in 1970 and yet would most probably not have gotten the No.1 place by the experts. The method of ranking was as it was back then.

You don't need to frickin' repeat it. I know it very well.

It was wrong to rate that way.
Learn to deal with it.

You think experts can never be wrong ?
Get over yourself.

You have not corrected your wrong Newcombe stats.

big whoop, I hadn't logged into TennisBase.
Instead of going on about it, you could've given it yourself.

From TennisBase,

In 1970, Newk won Wimbledon and 3 other smaller tournaments - Victorian Open, Casablanca WCT and North Of England Championships.

Doesn't change the main point.
 

abmk

Bionic Poster
I guess I’m influenced when I’ve seen how solid Newk was in matches against peak Connors, young Borg, peak Ashe and Smith in watching him in person.

that's understandable, but you are missing/downplaying the matches where he wasn't.

I will say this as one example. Got upset at Wimbledon by Rosewall in 74, ok, but he should've struck back when they met at USO. Instead he proceeded to lose to Rosewall at USO as well.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: pc1
Top