Admit it...

  • Thread starter Deleted member 748597
  • Start date

Adam Copeland

Hall of Fame
Murray won two Slams over Djok, who else can say that?

Everything you're saying supports my point. Murray wasn't as good as the B3. But being as good as the B3 isn't the threshold for being an ATG.

Weeks at 1 for Murrays is half of Hewitt's
Tour finals won by Murray is half of Hewitt's

Is that how an ATG is supposed to be? Lets declare Hewitt to be an ATG as well, it is only fair.
 

abmk

Bionic Poster
GOD Serve? haha .... Federer's serve is just an ATG serve that is precise, it is not a GOAT serve, Roddick and Hewitt made Federer's serve look GOATy but it wasn't. If Federer's serve was actually GOATy then it would have troubled Djokovic's return but it could not.

Sampras without Poly used to serve 120+ which was around 10-15 MPH higher than Federer on both 1st and 2nd in 2001, plus his ability to produce an ACE down the line or wide at will with supreme disguise and supreme clutch when facing a breakpoint is what makes his serve GOATy. With Poly his serve would be regularly 135+, that is the sort of weapon which might trouble Djokovic.

Players like Nadal and Sampras depended more on their athleticism to subdue their opponents, as they reached 30 their powers waned but when it was in full flow it was quite imposing and at times unstoppable. In his last years his Thalassemia Minor + his refusal to shift to poly and adapt + laziness to train more (he had the 3 golden records that Novak holds today and so he already was the GOAT, so he lost motivation) was what caused his career to end in 02, or else he is right up there with the Big 3.

Sampras born in mid-late 80s means you can divide the slams of the Big 3 among 4, plain and simple, wimbledon and his home slam, those would be his quite frequently.

If Wawrinka can win 3 slams then Sampras can and will win at least 14-15.

LOL, your posts are hilarious in a way,
The hilarious boosting up of Djokovic fuelled by ignorance+huge bias while you talk like you know much about Sampras.

" Roddick and Hewitt made Federer's serve look GOATy but it wasn't."

LOL, in which land did Hewitt make federer's serve look GOATy? Hewitt returned fed's serve fairly well.
Fed served better from 07 onwards (compared to 03-06 in general) which was past Hewitt's prime anyways.


Of course federer serve troubled Djokovic.
in their last 3 matches when fed was uninjured:
Paris 2018: djokovic did not break fed even once in 3 sets
Wim 19: djokovic did not break fed for 3.5 sets. broke him 3 times total over 5 sets
YEC 19: federer cleaned Djokovic's clock.

in 11-12: fed went 2-3 vs djoko in slams (a point away from 3-2) with 40%+ unret. serves in both RG 11 and Wim 12.
in 14-15: fed went 6-4 vs djoko in Bo3. Only djoko ultra-lucky with fed not being able to keep it up in Bo5 for long time at that age. you think he went 6-4 in Bo3 in 14-15 without serve troubling DJoko? LOL. fed's serve troubled djoko in Wim 14 final even though Djoko returned well. to a lesser extent in Wim 15 final.

and I haven't even got into Cincy where fed cleaned djoko's clock thrice (09,12,15) and the wins in USO 07,08,09 where fed's serve did trouble Djoko

Sampras' serve was of course better than Federer's, but mainly because of higher pace(&maybe willingness to take more risk on 2nd serve). fed's disguise/placement/variety/clutch was just as good.
7 mph diff in 1st serve speeds, 13 mph in 2nd serve speeds. This is at a stage of Sampras' career when he was going for more on the serve.

3132044015_3a5f72068b_o.jpg
 
Last edited:

abmk

Bionic Poster
Sampras automatically has the GOAT serve (which gives him a big edge) and the GOAT nerves of steel which only Novak seems to have in this era.

prime to prime, Nadal > Djokovic mentally, even if 2011 was highest for a year mentally. 12-14 drags Novak down, especially 13-14.
 

Adam Copeland

Hall of Fame
prime to prime, Nadal > Djokovic mentally, even if 2011 was highest for a year mentally. 12-14 drags Novak down, especially 13-14.

Novak is IRON.

Nobody on earth is tougher than him, his performance in 5 setters speaks for itself.

He said it is in 2006 that he would beat Nadal at the French Open, he was mocked and ridiculed by Nadal, the press, commentators, everyone, but eventually he prevailed, beat Nadal twice !

Breaking through the Fedal stronghold required GOAT level Mental toughness and Novak had it, on the other hand Nadal who was established All time great in 2011 surrendered his dominance to Novak, till 2010 Nadal was touted to succeed Federer, the year 2011 had a King.

Novak is IRON.
 

abmk

Bionic Poster
Novak is IRON.

Nobody on earth is tougher than him, his performance in 5 setters speaks for itself.

He said it is in 2006 that he would beat Nadal at the French Open, he was mocked and ridiculed by Nadal, the press, commentators, everyone, but eventually he prevailed, beat Nadal twice !

Breaking through the Fedal stronghold required GOAT level Mental toughness and Novak had it, on the other hand Nadal who was established All time great in 2011 surrendered his dominance to Novak, till 2010 Nadal was touted to succeed Federer, the year 2011 had a King.

Novak is IRON.

Djokovic being great mentally doesn't change that Nadal > Djokovic prime to prime mentally.
Djokovic in 12 couldn't deal with the close 3rd set vs fed in Wim 12.
blew it vs Nadal in USO 13 final
blew it vs Nishi in USO 14 semi
missed those last 2 shots vs Stan in AO 14 QF
missed an easy overhead in Oly 08 semi vs Nadal on MP (mind you, Djoko was slight favorite in this match)
obviously let nerves get the better of him vs Stan in RG 15 final and played passively
Stan outclutched him in USO 16 final again

etc.

now find me Nadal blowing so many matches from say 06-13.

remember Nadal saved 2 MPs vs a rampaging fed at Rome 06, saved multiple MPs vs djoko himself in Madrid 09.

Re: the FO, LOL. it only took Djoko 9 years and an utterly sh*te Nadal to do it in RG 15 (ended up losing the final to Wawrinka, heh)
Soderling's win over Nadal in RG 09 >> either of Djoko's wins at RG vs Nadal.

Again, Nadal did go 6-1 vs Djoko from clay season 2012 to USO 13, FTR (wins in MC 12, Rome 12, RG 12, RG 13, Montreal 13, USO 13 and only loss in MC 13). So don't forget that part after talking about 11-early 12.
 
Last edited:

Third Serve

Talk Tennis Guru
The guy who played in the era of three greatest tennis players of all time, beat all of them several times on many occasions on Slams and Masters, won 3 Grand Slams, played in 8 more finals, won 14 Masters 1000 titles, won 2 Olympic gold medals and won an ATP Finals, was 41 weeks at number 1 spot, is not an ATG?

Brother in my eyes he's top 10 of all time.
you're underrating him. he's probably top 5, maybe even top 4 above Sampras
 

Adam Copeland

Hall of Fame
Djokovic being great mentally doesn't change that Nadal > Djokovic prime to prime mentally.
Djokovic in 12 couldn't deal with the close 3rd set vs fed in Wim 12.
blew it vs Nadal in USO 13 final
blew it vs Nishi in USO 14 semi
missed those last 2 shots vs Stan in AO 14 QF
missed an easy overhead in Oly 08 semi vs Nadal on MP (mind you, Djoko was slight favorite in this match)
obviously let nerves get the better of him vs Stan in RG 15 final and played passively
Stan outclutched him in USO 16 final again

etc.

now find me Nadal blowing so many matches from say 06-13.

remember Nadal saved 2 MPs vs a rampaging fed at Rome 06, saved multiple MPs vs djoko himself in Madrid 09.

Re: the FO, LOL. it only took Djoko 9 years and an utterly sh*te Nadal to do it in RG 15 (ended up losing the final to Wawrinka, heh)
Soderling's win over Nadal in RG 09 >> either of Djoko's wins at RG vs Nadal.

Again, Nadal did go 6-1 vs Djoko from clay season 2012 to USO 13, FTR (wins in MC 12, Rome 12, RG 12, RG 13, Montreal 13, USO 13 and only loss in MC 13). So don't forget that part after talking about 11-early 12.

So much of stress on 2012-2014 period as if you have found a goldmine to undermine Novak's mental toughness :D

Bro, Novak is the toughest of the 3 and Federer is the weakest, we all know it. Nadal is somewhere in between them both, I agree that he was insanely tough till 2010, but from 2011 onwards his mental toughness is a joke....
 

abmk

Bionic Poster
So much of stress on 2012-2014 period as if you have found a goldmine to undermine Novak's mental toughness :D

Bro, Novak is the toughest of the 3 and Federer is the weakest, we all know it. Nadal is somewhere in between them both, I agree that he was insanely tough till 2010, but from 2011 onwards his mental toughness is a joke....

LOL, just stating the reality that you are trying to whitewash in your djoko fanboyism. 12-14 is like half of Djoko's prime years (11-16), LOL. 12 was actually good from djoko clutch wise, obviously not as good as you are making him out to be.

I also mentioned 15-16 vs Stan (RG 15, USO 16) and heck even YEC 16 tame loss to Murray with Murray having come off a 3.5 hr semi vs Raonic should be mentioned.
Also showed nerves big time vs Murray in RG 16 final in the 1st set. Had Murray not collapsed after that, Djoko would have been in some trouble. And if Murray hadn't taken out Stan in the semi and Djoko starts out that way vs Stan, its curtains.

Nadal > Djokovic mentally prime to prime. (&I'd say for career as well considering Djoko's 07-10)

From 2011 onwards, nadal's mental toughness is a joke? LOL, what utter rubbish.

RG 2011 final - Nadal came back from big deficit in 1st set, edged out 2nd set as well, took out fed's final shot with clutch play when down triple BP down early in the 4th set.
AO 12 QF and SF - was very clutch vs both Berdych and Fed
AO 12 F - saved 3 BPs towards end of 4th set vs Djoko that helped him take it to a 5th set. yeah, that one missed BH, but it wasn't a mental collapse, just one missed shot.
Rome 13 vs Gulbis - gulbis hit like 4 times the winners that Nadal did and yet Nadal prevailed
RG 13 SF - raised his level in the 5th set when he needed it
Montreal 13 vs djoko - edged out djoko in the 3rd set
USO 13 vs djoko - edged out djoko in the 3rd with excellent clutch play
AO 14 - was clutch vs Nishi, Dimi and fed. ok, 1st set missed couple of chances vs Stan, but Stan outplayed him even before injury.

Only Wim 11 final was a real mental loss for Nadal. Yeah, Djoko edged him out in 2011 Miami final, but that was more Djoko than Nadal being deficient mentally.
USO 11 he was outplayed by Djoko

it was really only from 15 onwards that nadal's mental lapses started showing, not at his prime.

lets just say that mentally, Nadal from clay season 2005-end of 2013 atleast (except maybe 11) > djoko mentally in any year except for 2011.
 
Last edited:

AO13

Hall of Fame
Hmm, 6-8 slams while Big 3 have 12-16 ?
WOW, You think Pete is that bad ?

On contrary my friend, I think Pete is that good. :D

Everybody is entitled to their own opinion, and I will end this dialogue with that statement. I find that further continuing this conversation is unnecessary and futile.

you're underrating him. he's probably top 5, maybe even top 4 above Sampras

Yeah whatever you say, Alexander the Bald. :laughing:
 
Last edited:
Top