Andy Roddick is still the best!

Tourmalante

New User
I'm not worried about Andy's loss yesterday. Not at all. Anybody could see that he was charitably throwing away the match to a younger and greener opponent so that fans and the media wouldn't grumble about his dominance when he wins the other three majors this year. When Andy is playing to his full potential he is the best tennis player in the world...I mean just look at his 2005 resume: 5 titles on all surfaces not even Federer accomplished the latter!- and at such prestigious venues as Lyon and San Jose to boot(definitely Tier 1)! Look at how he dismantled such august opponents as Julien Benneteau, and Michael Lammer! All Andy has to do to become #1 is serve big and back it up with big forehands, and we know he posseses both weapons. Just look at how close Andy was to beating Federer at 2005 Wimbledon. He was up a break in the second set! Nadal opted out of the Aussie Open so he could treat his injuries in preparation for battling Andy in the upcoming French Open Final. He knows that Andy is his only true contender what with him being #1 for 13 weeks(a record # tied with Connors) and his US Open title and great showings at Roland Garros. And the US Open might as well stencil Andy's name in the trophy today. I know it would definitely save time. Fushing Meadows is Andy's backyard hes won there the past two years while his rival Roger hasn't has gotten knocked out by satellite players. So I say to all Andy fans, do not give up hope, our main man is just giving the rope-a-dope to the opposition . They'll never know what hit them when he bags all the hardware for the rest of the year!
 

RiosTheGenius

Hall of Fame
I'm thinking now that most players remaining in the tournament must be buying Baghdatis drinks and stuff. Roger, kiefer, and Nalbandian were probably extremely worried about facing Andy Roddick..... that big serve, gets those guys really nervous.
 

Aykhan Mammadov

Hall of Fame
To quiet u I must tell that u are true, he is not the worst, he is 3-d, 4-th or maybe 5-th in the world. So of course, 1 match doesn't mean so much and his fans must not give up and must support him further.

It seems to me also that his study method at young ages was not correct. He first learned to serve, and then started very late to learn how to play tennis. IMHO must be in the reverse order. I don't see any improvement in his tactics, only a little improvement in backhand. IMO he must find more experienced coach, otherwise as new generation grow he will lose his ranking position.
 

Shabazza

Legend
Hi Tourmalante, found a new message board to troll, after you made a fool out of yourself at MTF a few month ago?! :mrgreen:
here's what your so called "Fed-troll" wrote after Fed lost to Nalby at the MC:

Tourmalante said:
A Federer Fan has hung up his ninja gear for good

Now hear me out. Perhaps you think I am being irrational or unduly harsh in the face of a lone defeat but I am heartfelt in this sentiment. I have decided to give up tennis for a while at least and pursue other hobbies because of my dissapointment at the manner of Federer's loss. It is my fault that I have grown too pychologicallly attached to his success and this let down has left me completely drained and depressed for the forseeable future. The fact that Federer lost is not the main reason for my disgust. Only the manner in which he lost.

Today all of Roger's glorious achievements meant nothing. When somebody actually gave him a challenge he folded just like the Federer who folded to hewitt in Australia. Though I was sad after Federer's losses in Australia and Roland Garros I could deal with them because I felt Roger had played his heart out in Melbourne and never really looked right from the start at the FO semifinal. Here i cannot accept his loss. Sjengster was completely right about the growing fragility he sensed in Federer, especially on break point conversion. We saw the seeds of his defeat in the second and third sets of his US Open Final win over Agassi (also some shaky moments vs. hewitt, and many other matches this year) where he let Agassi off the hook in humerous service games when he was up 40-15 or 40-30. In the end it didn't matter there but the fault lines were clear to see for an inquiring mind. In today's match Federer had his moment of truth at 6-5 in the fifth.

He was just about to cement one of the greatest comebacks in recent years. The match was on his racket and he only needed to dig out four first serves and a few potent groundstrokes against a tight Nalbandian in order to save the day. It was here that Roger's true mettle was found wanting. A sign of a true tennis great is the ability to close out matters when blood is smelt. With a match on his racket Sampras never failed to deliver on the big stage. But amazingly Roger's serve, the assumed better serve of the two players in today's final, proved to be the more impotent one.

We saw that when faced with a talented and highly motivated opponent Roger does not have the ability to take a match out of their hands with forcing play like Pete could with his serve-and-volley game. He was at 30-00 and managed to double fault yet again, and then surrender the game in an astonishing display of fragility that harkened to his early days on the tour. In the ensuing tiebreak he managed to let Nalbandian get an early lead which the Argentine never relinquished and the five set conquest was complete.

I can honestly say that i am disgusted with Roger's performance today, injury or no. He realized the stakes and history on the line. but as soon as he won the second set on tiebreak he seemed so relieved that he immediately handed Davide the third set. Make no mistake, this final featured great play by Nalbandian and was markedly better than any other match at the Cup and many other matches played this year. But it was a choke of the highest order by Roger, and one that may be a turning point(for the worse) of his career.

The end of this year ends on a sharply sour note, he has once again let nalbandian pyschologically enter his head, and future success at the majors is less than clear if he meets similar resistance from other players next year without doing some soul searching, a lot of offseason work, and a retooling of his repertoire, game, and style of play. Roger's serve was so pathetic in this match that even at 40-00 I expected nalbandian to fight to deuce and eventually win the game. There was no certainty at all in his shots and his first serve percentage was attrocious. But I witheld my anger thinking that Roger would win the "big points" and not fail to capitalize on any big break tha came his way. Today he had the match handed to him on a silver platter and tossed it away. My respect for Federer dropped significantly. He lacked professionalism in closing out after having a two-sets to love lead. I believe this match will break his spirit much in the way that Sharapova's loss to Serena in Australia has seen her in a decline.

There is no excuse for the lacksadaisicalness and lack of focus and hunger Roger exhibited today, and I was ashamed to be his fan for the first time in my life. I cringed with each netted return, each netted first serve, each stoned volley. I could not see any areas in which Roches tutelage has helped him I am sorry to say. His netplay seems to have weakened since 2003. And his aggresiveness has waned since last year. He thought that slicing deep balls to Nalbandian, and playing half-hearted service games would get the job done against Nalbandian. Today we saw that Federer the headcase and choker we once new is not a vanished man but a persona hiding in Roger who only rears his ugly head when the going gets tough. I hope Roger had a good hard cry after this loss because I wouldn't want the match to hurt me more than it did him.

This was not one of those matches where you gamely sallute your opponents superior play and content yourself to the fact that you gave all of yourself. This was a loss that should make him weep, curse his weakness, and make him spend hours reviewing tape and retooling himself on the practice court. He blew it today. And I hope other federer fans don't meekly salute him for his "fight" in the last set but actually call him on his incredibly poor and "soft" performance today. I know some of you will try to laugh at the fact that I am criticizing one of four losses he has held on the year, but such is federer's position at the moment that one can never be content to look at a glass as half full but honestly evaluate his play. Please all of you tell me of your thoughts on this subject. Even if you say I am totally crazy, spoiled by Roger's successes, etc. I would appreciate hearing from you.

so just ignore him, he's.....well a troll, but no Fed-troll anymore, apparently :rolleyes:
 

Dan007

Hall of Fame
I'm a big Andy fan but I'm starting to get disappointed in his performances. He has a big game. Huge serve and forehand, but Andy's gotta get Brad Gilbert back as his coach and he has to change the style of his game. He has to be smarter on the court and think more. Instead overpowering his opponents or hitting the ball hard from 5-10 feet behind the baseline, he should stick closer to the baseline and use his weapons more effectively, instead of keep coming to the net after a bad shot or all suddenly since his volleys are horrible, he must hit a good approch with his FH. He must get stronger on his mentality and mental game, which Gilbert can help him on that.
 

Fee

Legend
Yes, this board needed YET ANOTHER Andy Roddick thread...

(and Tourmalente is a troll).
 

BabolatFan

Semi-Pro
I also a big Andy fan. Maybe he didn't tie his shoelaces right that day (being sarcastic). Ok, Baghdatis had a big win over Andy but I'd be more pissed off if his next match is let down.
 

BabolatFan

Semi-Pro
I also a big Andy fan. Maybe he didn't tie his shoelaces right that day (being sarcastic). Ok, Baghdatis had a big win over Andy but I'd be more pissed off if his next match is a let down.
 

rommil

Legend
Tourmalante said:
I'm not worried about Andy's loss yesterday. Not at all. Anybody could see that he was charitably throwing away the match to a younger and greener opponent so that fans and the media wouldn't grumble about his dominance when he wins the other three majors this year. When Andy is playing to his full potential he is the best tennis player in the world...I mean just look at his 2005 resume: 5 titles on all surfaces not even Federer accomplished the latter!- and at such prestigious venues as Lyon and San Jose to boot(definitely Tier 1)! Look at how he dismantled such august opponents as Julien Benneteau, and Michael Lammer! All Andy has to do to become #1 is serve big and back it up with big forehands, and we know he posseses both weapons. Just look at how close Andy was to beating Federer at 2005 Wimbledon. He was up a break in the second set! Nadal opted out of the Aussie Open so he could treat his injuries in preparation for battling Andy in the upcoming French Open Final. He knows that Andy is his only true contender what with him being #1 for 13 weeks(a record # tied with Connors) and his US Open title and great showings at Roland Garros. And the US Open might as well stencil Andy's name in the trophy today. I know it would definitely save time. Fushing Meadows is Andy's backyard hes won there the past two years while his rival Roger hasn't has gotten knocked out by satellite players. So I say to all Andy fans, do not give up hope, our main man is just giving the rope-a-dope to the opposition . They'll never know what hit them when he bags all the hardware for the rest of the year!
The best at WHAT?????? Yet another Free Martha/Roger is Boring post. Face it, Roddick does not impose the same intimidation like he used to. Players have figured that if they could deal with Andy's serve then they can deal with the rest of his game. Andy stands too far back and it seems like he is very vulnerable when the opponents draws him to the net and pass him. Roddick also need to stay in the baseline because what ever crap he is trying to learn with his volleys, it is NOT getting better.
 

PM_

Professional
Tourmalante said:
I'm not worried about Andy's loss yesterday. Not at all. Anybody could see that he was charitably throwing away the match to a younger and greener opponent so that fans and the media wouldn't grumble about his dominance when he wins the other three majors this year. When Andy is playing to his full potential he is the best tennis player in the world...I mean just look at his 2005 resume: 5 titles on all surfaces not even Federer accomplished the latter!- and at such prestigious venues as Lyon and San Jose to boot(definitely Tier 1)! Look at how he dismantled such august opponents as Julien Benneteau, and Michael Lammer! All Andy has to do to become #1 is serve big and back it up with big forehands, and we know he posseses both weapons. Just look at how close Andy was to beating Federer at 2005 Wimbledon. He was up a break in the second set! Nadal opted out of the Aussie Open so he could treat his injuries in preparation for battling Andy in the upcoming French Open Final. He knows that Andy is his only true contender what with him being #1 for 13 weeks(a record # tied with Connors) and his US Open title and great showings at Roland Garros. And the US Open might as well stencil Andy's name in the trophy today. I know it would definitely save time. Fushing Meadows is Andy's backyard hes won there the past two years while his rival Roger hasn't has gotten knocked out by satellite players. So I say to all Andy fans, do not give up hope, our main man is just giving the rope-a-dope to the opposition . They'll never know what hit them when he bags all the hardware for the rest of the year!

okay kid
 

westside

Hall of Fame
Tourmalante said:
Just look at how close Andy was to beating Federer at 2005 Wimbledon. He was up a break in the second set!

CLOSE!?! Roddick got hammered by Federer........again. Lots of people have broken Federer. I don't find a straights set lost close.
 
Top