Pete.Sampras.
Semi-Pro
Are you satisfied with Wilson's explanation for their new [K]-technology?
I couldn't make a poll so... post your comments please
I couldn't make a poll so... post your comments please
DownTheTeeAce said:althought i have a k90 but i dun buy that [k]rap
I appreciate that level of objectivity from the owner of a K-Factor, when some users are unprepared to say anything negative about the racquet. I am absolutely not satisfied with Wilson's explanation. It is a pity that a racquet that is supposed to play so well needs to be generously clothed in bull[K]rap to justify its price tag.
But, we all know what happened to PK. The public cannot be expected to buy a good racquet just because it is good. Wilson seems to be doing things that are good for their business. People who like the K-Factor's playability and performance (and can afford it) don't seem to care. People who are undecided or uninformed can probably be enticed by the claims of the article.
From a tennis enthusiast's POV, the article explaining the [K]technology is a faintly amusing example of how desperate Wilson is to shove the [K] Factor down our throats. Karophite is such a lame term, possibly conjured up after a legal scramble about property rights, that it is actually funny.
Yes, of course. Kia is pushing its message down our throats. The same thing applies to all the top 500 companies. Heck, if I run a company, I would have to do the same thing. That does not mean that I have to like it. There is a difference between tolerating something and agreeing with it. Wasn't that the question that the OP asked: Are you satisfied?. The answer is an unequivocal "No". I can tolerate Wilson's [K] factor publicity. I just don't agree with it. Shoot me for it, if you wish.:grin:Maybe KIA is trying to push its message down our throats?
Do you get my point?.. So lay off with the Wilson bashing.. you are all starting to sound like broken down records...And to be honest, there is more to life than this silly and over run argument! Name 500 companies in the world, and you could say the same thing about all of them!
Yeah. I live in Silicon Valley. I know a little bit about that. Please don't patronize.chris_in_japan said:You buy it, you dont. Its called capitalism..
Yeah. I live in Silicon Valley. I know a little bit about that. Please don't patronize.
Know what, I always think that Wilson K-Factor is directly borrowed from the famous "K-Brand" cereal. Just look at the cereal and it claims after having it as breakfast, your body feels better (vs. better racket feel), feels more comfortable (vs. racket comfort), better performance in exercise (in order word, better control of your body, vs. better racket control) and blah blah blah...
So when I play tennis, I always bring this "K-Brand" cereal rather than banana to court as extra K-Factor to help me win.
The Silicon Valley comment was made in a self-deprecating and light-hearted way, hinting at the irrational exuberance of the late 1990s that resulted in the Bursting of the Great Bubble. It was a rueful comment about capitalism and the way and extent to which we think about it. It was the exact opposite of "patronizing".chris_in_japan said:I live in Japan! So don't patronize me!..
Can't I b-itch about something important and imaginative and enjoy it too? Or are the two mutually exclusive? If I enjoy it, does it cease to be important?All I was saying was that you are complaining about something, and you said you had enjoyed doing it. Which would then suggest to me that you are simply just b**ching about something that really isn't all that important or imaginative?
You're right, it doesn't. It does suggest that I am a bit of a shallow idiot, which is actually true. There is really no point denying it. Thanks for wasting your time.chris_in_japan said:So in conclusion, that doesn't say whole lot about you now does it?
The Silicon Valley comment was made in a self-deprecating and light-hearted way, hinting at the irrational exuberance of the late 1990s that resulted in the Bursting of the Great Bubble. It was a rueful comment about capitalism and the way and extent to which we think about it. It was the exact opposite of "patronizing".
Can't I b-itch about something important and imaginative and enjoy it too? Or are the two mutually exclusive? If I enjoy it, does it cease to be important?
You're right, it doesn't. It does suggest that I am a bit of a shallow idiot, which is actually true. There is really no point denying it. Thanks for wasting your time.
Oh, if you only knew. Now, I'm enjoying this.Yawn............ Gee.. Is it that time already?
I would explain, seriously. However, I happen to be in a tete-a-tete with Chris here, and we are getting along famously.KingOfTennis said:you know every buisness markets their stuff. You are stupid if u dont. It is caled advertisement u dumb-ass jerks
why doesn't a chemist just slice the racquet open and do some lab work on it
Hmmmm....
A. Any chemist that is at all reliable probably doesnt post on these boards nor have an extreme interest in tennis
B. A chemist really couldnt prove much, think about nCode, proving that the graphite molecules are spaced closer together is pretty tough.
C. To my knowledge, running expensive machinery is expensive
D. They are too busy researching important things
Sufficient?
Hmmmm....
A. Any chemist that is at all reliable probably doesnt post on these boards nor have an extreme interest in tennis
B. A chemist really couldnt prove much, think about nCode, proving that the graphite molecules are spaced closer together is pretty tough.
C. To my knowledge, running expensive machinery is expensive
D. They are too busy researching important things
Sufficient?
Oh, if you only knew. Now, I'm enjoying this.
I would explain, seriously. However, I happen to be in a tete-a-tete with Chris here, and we are getting along famously.
Really? Oh, what a pity you had to reply to my uninteresting nonsense 4 times in this thread alone. I admire your single-minded dedication to an uninteresting cause. .And for that to happen, I would actually have to be interested in what you had to say?
Im not.....
Thanks. No, I'm not named after the X-men character. I didn't know that there was an X-men character named Polaris. I googled for it and find that it is a female character, so I would rather not use it, being a guy.Anyways, Polaris are you named after the X-man? Regardless, your perspicacity is most impressive.
Simple answer. Because people don't buy racquets for the paintjob. People buy racquets for how the racquet plays. Anyone who buys racquets for the paintjob isn't a real tennis player.If people hate the paint job so much on these boards, why is it selling?
Really? Oh, what a pity you had to reply to my uninteresting nonsense 4 times in this thread alone. I admire your single-minded dedication to an uninteresting cause. .
Sound advice. I appreciate your tireless efforts to keep me from sin.Playing with yourself will lead to hairy palms and blindness...
Agree completely, with the small modification of "people" to "Most people". BTW, regarding the K-Factor paintjob, it looked ugly in photographs, but it was not so bad when I held it in my hand at the tennis shop. I still like the ncode90 paintjob better. Unfortunately, I am not not good enough (and my elbow is probably not strong enough) to play either with the nCode 90 or the K90. The Asian K90 has intriguing specs though. I would want to give that a whirl, if I ever come across one. I am curious to see how the power and feel of the K90 compares with that of the Copper Ace 90 and the Spectrum Comp 90 that I have been using for a few weeks.Breakpoint said:Simple answer. Because people don't buy racquets for the paintjob. People buy racquets for how the racquet plays. Anyone who buys racquets for the paintjob isn't a real tennis player.
Sorry about this topic getting side-tracked, Pete. I was trying to explain that Wilson's explanation did not satisfy me, only to discover that I had poked a rather tender nerve in Chris.This is going the wrong way somehow...
Some of you guys hardly say anything about whether the explanation satisfied you or not... but that's what I wanted to know.
Sorry about this topic getting side-tracked, Pete. I was trying to explain that Wilson's explanation did not satisfy me, only to discover that I had poked a rather tender nerve in Chris.