Why are you so cynical??
I actually work in the industry and have these rackets in my possession now. They will be shown to dealers in the next several weeks and I'm sure photos and more info will come out soon. I can't release any photos myself due to my employment contract.
Stay tuned non believers!!
And why are you so persistent on proving* every sceptic wrong?
When the Ultra line comes out everything will be known... or at least we will be able to verify the mold.
My friend who owns some prostocks (H22, H19, racquets belonging to Berdych, Dimitrov etc.) when I said the H19 might come out in retail said we're going to take one out for hit and compare it side by side. Granted not the best way to verify the layup considering mods such as lead and sillicone but we will try to get the retail to the specs of the prostock.
Now the specs you provided mean little to nothing in terms of mold - headsize & beam width are just a small part of the equation. Head geometry, beam geometry, length of shaft etc.
I am also a sceptic though due to the fact that not many players use it means H22/Steam99 users can still endorse Burns.
Secondly the H19 has a headsize which still is quite popular - this issue regards the non-release policy of the 93 used by Dimitrov.
However there are some arguments against releasing it, such as creating a competitor model to their PS97 & Blade models.
Also Dimitrov proved that sometimes when you want to release a pro mold the player can really mess up. Wilson released 2 of his molds and still he ended up with a different one.
Everybody needs to chill and wait for the outcome.
* - you're not proving anything, for the time being it's a word vs word debate;