stringertom
Bionic Poster
Sparties to the Final Four with a determined effort and a gift at the charity line in the closing seconds of regulation. Two Big 10 teams still alive.
Sparties to the Final Four with a determined effort and a gift at the charity line in the closing seconds of regulation. Two Big 10 teams still alive.
I agree with all of this. The winner of this game will be the clear Cinderella in the Final Four, but you never know. Put yourself in position and sometimes the magic happens.
who is in final four this year ?
The Harrison's are amazing. As mentally tough as they come. But, I was a little worried that Andrew made the play too early when he left 6 seconds on the clock. That's almost 3 times as much time as Duke had in the most crushing loss in UK's history, right? I think he was surprised that a lane opened so he took it. Ideally, you want to run all the time off, but you also have to score, so you have to take the opportunity when it's there.
I think Brey's strategy was the right one. Towns got his, but no other Kentucky player ever truly got going offensively. He did double a couple times and it resulted in good looks and points for UK, one being the key 3 by Ulis when ND had taken their biggest lead, 59-53. ND employed similar tactics in their 3 games against Duke and they won two of those. Okafor went a combined 32-47 from the field and 6-17 from the FT line, averaging 23.3 pts/g. So, I can't really fault that. I also think those who criticize them for going isolation with Grant in the last few possessions are wrong. Once again, that is what they did all season. They let Grant take over and make the plays down the stretch in big games. As the old saying goes, You dance with the one who brought you. I think both teams did that and in the end, Kentucky was just a little bit better.
I couldn't disagree more about Kentucky's chemistry. They are a very unselfish team and play well together. Outside of Towns, they just had an off night offensively. They're never going to look like Notre Dame because they're a different type of team. Pounding the ball inside and playing inside-out is never going to look as entertaining as a guard heavy team that moves constantly and shoots well does, but that doesn't mean Notre Dame is a more cohesive team.
I just think ND is better equipped than anyone else to attack and break down Kentucky's defense, and they're a tough team to tackle with only a day to prepare. I don't think they played harder or that UK played bad defensively. There's a reason they're one of the best offenses in the nation. They had some potential mismatches with their quickness and simply exploited that and out-executed for much of the game. Kentucky had an off night offensively for about 3/4 of the game, but Towns kept them afloat until they got some plays from elsewhere down the stretch.
who is in final four this year ?
Ouch. Cold shooting in second half and a missed free throw did my Cards in.
Gotta cheer for the Wildcats now.
Wisconsin (35-3) v Kentucky (38-0)
Michigan State (27-11) v Duke (33-4)
Basically, three heavyweights and an improbable run by Michigan State, if that is possible with Izzo. He's done this so many times now, I can't imagine anyone is surprised. They are a #7 seed. The rest are #1 seeds.
Kentucky being unbeaten and making a run at history is the dominant story of the tournament this year. They are going to have to earn it to finish the deal though - I cannot recall a stronger Final Four in recent memory. Either of these three teams would have been heavy favorites in last year's tournament.
Would have liked Harrison to take the shot, hit the rim, with 4 seconds left. You really don't want to run all the time off. Better to leave a few ticks on the clock for an offensive rebound.
On chemistry, of course Kentucky is unselfish and play well together. But to have frequent mass substitutions, no way they can develop the type of cohesiveness other top 5 teams do. Thus far they haven't needed to. Notre Dames defense did a number on UK, and N.D defense is ranked around 100. So IMO Kentucky should have been a lot smoother on offense.
Wisconsin looks a lot like Notre Dame. They shot the lights out against Arizona. So should be another great game.
I pick Kentucky to win it all. only cause they are able to avoid Stanford this year.
Calipari phased the platoon system out in December and has basically settled on an 8-man rotation (with Lee playing sparingly here and there). So, they are playing a pretty conventional rotation.
Kentucky missed a ton of easy shots they normally make. But, they still shot 53% and didn't miss in the last 12 minutes, making their last 9 FG attempts. They had their way with ND offensively, especially in crunch time, mainly because all that was required was going to Towns in the post. Honestly, both teams pretty much got what they wanted offensively I thought. UK just missed a bunch of 2-3 foot gimmes and committed some uncharacteristically sloppy TOs, especially early, while ND went almost 30 minutes without a turnover.
The big difference between them and ND is that Wisconsin's guys are bigger and slower which is a better matchup for Kentucky. I don't think Wisconsin can break Kentucky down and get to the rim as effectively as Notre Dame. Kentucky is just as big and much more athletic. But, when you are capable of hitting 12/18 threes and are as efficient and disciplined as Wisconsin, you present a different set of problems. I just think Kentucky is better equipped to deal with Wisconsin.
Notre Dame, IMO, should have been a #2 seed. They are every bit as good as anyone Kentucky will see in the Final Four. Everyone seems to remember them losing by 30 to Duke, but forget that ND beat them in their other two meetings. The Irish were undervalued.
Wasn't really referring to platoon system, just the number of players that got 20 something minutes and all the subbing they did. Coach Cal is making it work, thus far, hope he continues, but personally I think they are too deep. Cal talks about it all the time on his radio show. How the players are sacrificing their minutes for the sake of the team, when they could be getting 36 minutes a game anywhere else. All of that NBA talent is a nice problem to have though.
They had their way with ND defensively? They had Towns down low shooting layup and dunks, nothing else seemed to be working. Except for Towns no one else seemed to be shooting the ball that well. I thought ND was significantly more efficient in their offense than UK.
If not for UK, or UL, would have loved to see the Fighting Irish win it all. Sucks when you are one play from winning. All about seeding, matchups, clutch play... and a little luck.
You are correct in that no one, excluding Booker (4-6), outside of Towns was shooting particularly well, but when you can get layups and dunks almost at will, why would you do anything else? Granted, its not as pretty as NDs motion and passing, but you can't do any better than consistently getting layups on offense, which is essentially what Kentucky did. They shot a better % for the game. It was mostly one guy, but after watching a lot of basketball through the years, and watching teams refuse to feed big men with a clear advantage in the post, I think teams like Kentucky and Duke deserve a lot of credit for consistently doing just that, because apparently it is harder than it looks to get teams/perimeter players to do it. They want to shoot the 3-ball.
Definitely gotta have some luck to win it all. I always think of UCLA's most recent title (1995). They won 5 of their six tournament games by 10+. But, that one game was a second round matchup against #8/9 seed Missouri in which UCLA needed it's PG, Tyus Edney, to dash the length of the court to hit a contested, off-balance layup as time expired to secure a one point win. So, a national champion that mowed through the tournament, was one lucky play away from being out in the first weekend. That play, that team and their run to the title is the epitome of March Madness to me.
I guess you have to give Duke some credit for getting thier despite the fact they were gift wrapped a 1 seed with the easiest road of all. Utah was the only team that was ever going to scare them in that region. but you still have to play the games and you still have to win.
AZ still should have been the other #1 seed. Its kinda tough for them to lose backto back years to wisconsin.
Wis/KU I dont think is going to be close. If KU is going to lose it will be to duke in the title game. with the 4 or 5 days of Prep for the semi they will be ready for Wisconsin. But to come back on short rest and play Duke (Big If) if Winslow keeps running all over the place and affecting every play like he did against Gonzaga and Okafor making life for Towns tough they can maybe do it.
MSU simply cant.
I haven't seen a big man dominate in the post, like Towns did the last 10 minutes of that game, in a long time. Maybe ND doubled down on him some, but you have to stop the endless parade of layups and finger rolls. Towns was all that was working yeah, so make somebody else beat you. Both coaches didn't seem to deviate much from their game plan.
Okafor gets much hype but Winslow has been the force all tourney long for the Dookies' run to the finals. Happened again tonight.
Go Big Blue! I lived in Lexington in the 1970's and what a basketball city that is!
Keeping on my broadcast critique, the play-by-play guy said, after Kentucky won the opening tip, that "UK's first possession here will be critical". Since when has the opening possession of the game ever been "critical"?
Crazier than ever with what Calipari has done...
Agreed. Tough game to officiate.That officiating was pretty bad for both teams.
Agreed. Tough game to officiate.
The blown shot clock violation was big. Wisconsin really needed those two points as the Wildcats were on the verge of taking control of the game. Even bigger though, was Dekker's step-back trey.
ya, I don't understand how in the world UK didn't get called for a flagrant 1 on that possession before
I don't think I've ever heard worse back to back broadcasts. Duke vs. MSU was bad, but this game is an abomination brought to you by TNT. It's putting a damper on a very exciting game.
Edit: I just realized I'm watching the UK "team stream". Makes sense now.
Still, I pick Duke Monday by a touchdown.
I finally figured out that the Wisconsin stream was on truTV and TBS carried the national broadcast, actually. I watched the first game on the Duke stream. I do not recomend. It's a poorer production all the way around, though the Wisconsin stream had Wayne Larabee doing play by play, who's a pretty decent sportscaster.Don't worry, the TBS broadcast was the Wisconsin stream.
That's why it's called March Madness. :twisted:Tough loss for KY. Now that it's over, as a UK fan I can say it, I hope they never go into the tournament unbeaten again. Not because I think it helps the team to have a loss...it helps me. I so badly wanted to see a team go undefeated, it made these games unbearably stressful.. Let somebody else make a run at it. As long as they aren't playing UK, I will be pulling for them.
Wisconsin has done nothing but impress, but so has Duke. They have been playing great in this tournament and just manhandled Sparty today. Beat the Badgers earlier this season by 10 points and Wisconsin has to guard against even a slight letdown after slaying the mighty Wildcats. I'll be watching Monday.I'll take a piece of that
The 1-done has really hurt college ball. Just think that Anthony Davis would be a senior under the old landscape. Mid majors and mid powers like Wisconsin have really benefitted from the top teams getting worse.
There needs to be major rules changes to get offense up. And make kids stay 2-3 years if they don't jump from high school (nba union won't allow that though).
So Sad about riots in Kentucky.
Talk about sore losers. *smh*
Props to Wisconsin for nerves of steel down the stretch. Big fan of Bo Ryan and the way Wisconsin plays, in general, so if UK lost to anyone I'm glad it was them. They deserved it. UK was out-coached and out-played down the stretch, plain and simple. Those are the moments when experience really comes into play.
Officiating was horrendous. From the charge calls and no charges to the obvious flagrant 1 on UK to the Wisconsin bucket after the shot clock expired, it was bad both ways.
Pulling for Wisconsin tonight but Duke looked darn impressive Saturday.
Ashamed to be a UK grad after seeing the behaviour by many in Lexington after the game. Your team has been there many times before and will be back next year...have some class.
True, true. I agree with all of that. I don't think Bo Ryan did anything special, he just coached great as usual. I question Calipari's decision to try and kill clock with 5 minutes to play and only up 4. But, happy for Bo, I'm glad he's finally having this kind of success. I really hope they beat Duke, but I have my doubts. Good luck to the Badgers. It could be a while before they get back to this level.
As long as Calipari stays, UK should be the pre-season #1 again. They'll be loaded once more...as a fan, you're an idiot if you aren't satisfied with being a legit title contender every season. What more can you ask for?
UK really locked Wiscy down the middle 10 minutes of the second but the first and last 5 minutes of the half belonged to the Badgers. Dekker killed them with his movement and shooting. Of course, UK had what, like 3 consecutive shot clock violations during one stretch? Wisconsin also out-rebounded UK by 10+, which should not happen (really no excuse for that stat). It was actually a well-played game and both teams shot well from the field and the line. Wisconsin just made more big plays in clutch situations and dominated the boards. That was the difference.
fun first half