Comparing Fed 2010-2017 to Nadal of 2010-17

[fed2004-2017]

Now you all are probably super sick of another Fedal thread but this is quite interesting. I compared Post Prime Fed to Peak Nadal. Here are the numbers

Tournaments Played
Federer 119
Nadal 132
Tournament Finals
Federer 58
Nadal 64
Tournament Titles
Federer 33
Nadal 39
% of Titles to Played Events
Federer 27.7
Nadal 29.5
Hard Court Matches
Federer 347
Nadal 295
Hard Court Winning %
Federer 85.5
Nadal 78.6
Clay Court Matches
Federer 99
Nadal 227
Clay Court Winning %
Federer 73.7
Nadal 91.6
Grass Court Matches
Federer 88
Nadal 41
Grass Court Winning %
Federer 86.3
Nadal 73.1

Total Winning % in all matches 2010-2017

Federer 83.52
Nadal 83.48

Head to Head
Federer 8
Nadal 10

GS H2H
Federer 1
Nadal 3

Masters Titles
Federer 11
Nadal 15

Masters Finals
Federer 21
Nadal 25

Who has come out on top in this period between Fed and Nadal?

 

[Jackuar]

Equal. Age gives the brownie points to Fed as the tie breaker so he wins.

 

[sbengte]

Equal. Age gives the brownie points to Fed as the tie breaker so he wins.

Also Fed I think has lost out more due to injury during this period (that includes entire seasons where he played with injury like 2013). Nadal's knees have been completely healed since about 2011 or so.

 

[Jackuar]

Also Fed I think has lost out more due to injury during this period (that includes entire seasons where he played with injury like 2013). Nadal's knees have been completely healed since about 2011 or so.

Nadal had his bad stretch a well.. 2014-2015 isn't it? So, as I said, it's very equal in wins, losses and injuries. And for just being older and yet being the champion he ever has been, fed gets the tie breaker.

 

[sbengte]

Nadal had his bad stretch a well.. 2014-2015 isn't it? So, as I said, it's very equal in wins, losses and injuries. And for just being older and yet being the champion he ever has been, fed gets the tie breaker.

Nadal wasn't injured in 2014-2015, only out of form and lacking confidence .

 

[Jackuar]

Nadal wasn't injured in 2014-2015, only out of form and lacking confidence .

Wrist injury and appendicitis in 2014 second half. 2015 was out of low confidence mainly, yes.

 

[abmk]

The stat that matters most is missing :

# of Grand Slams :
Nadal - 10 (1 AO, 6 RG, 2 USO, 1 Wimbledon)
Federer - 4 (2 Wimbledon, 2 AO)

 

[abmk]

Others :

# of Grand Slam finals :

Nadal - 15 (3 AO, 6 RG, 2 Wimbledon, 4 USO)
Federer - 8 (2 AO, 1 RG, 4 Wimbledon, 1 USO)

# of Grand Slam semis :

Nadal - 15 (3 at AO, 6 at RG, 2 at Wimbledon, 4 at USO)
Federer - 18 (7 at AO, 2 at RG, 5 at Wimbledon, 4 at USO)

YECs :

Nadal - 0
Federer - 2

YEC finals:

Nadal - 2
Federer - 5

 

[Waspsting]

The stat that matters most is missing :

# of Grand Slams :
Nadal - 7 (5 RG, 2 USO)
Federer - 4 (2 Wimbledon, 2 AO)

Nadal - 10 (6 Frenches, 1 Wimbledon, 3 US')
Federer - 4 (2 Aus', 2 Wimbledon's)

# of Grand Slam finals :

Nadal - 12 (3 AO, 5 RG, 1 Wimbledon, 3 USO)
Federer - 8 (2 AO, 1 RG, 4 Wimbledon, 1 USO)

Nadal - 15 (3 Aus, 6 Frenches, 2 Wimbledons, 4 US')
Federer - 8 (2 Aus, 1 French, 4 Wimbledons, 1 US)

# of Grand Slam semis :

Nadal - 12 (3 at AO, 5 at RG, 1 at Wimbledon, 3 at USO)
Federer - 16 (6 at AO, 2 at RG, 5 at Wimbledon, 3 at USO)

Nadal 15 - (3 Aus, 6 Frenches, 2 Wimbledons, 4 US')
Federer 18 - (7 Aus, 2 Frenches, 5 Wimbledons, 4 US')

 

[abmk]

Nadal - 10 (6 Frenches, 1 Wimbledon, 3 US')
Federer - 4 (2 Aus', 2 Wimbledon's)



Nadal - 15 (3 Aus, 6 Frenches, 2 Wimbledons, 4 US')
Federer - 8 (2 Aus, 1 French, 4 Wimbledons, 1 US)




Nadal 15 - (3 Aus, 6 Frenches, 2 Wimbledons, 4 US')
Federer 18 - (7 Aus, 2 Frenches, 5 Wimbledons, 4 US')

already corrected (I had missed 2010 for most part, was counting from 2011 onwards)

 

[Druss]

The stat that matters most is missing :

# of Grand Slams :
Nadal - 10 (1 AO, 6 RG, 2 USO, 1 Wimbledon)
Federer - 4 (2 Wimbledon, 2 AO)

So in theory, Nadal has been the better player in general over that 7-8 year stretch, right?

Ok, but that's not taking into consideration, in that period, Nadal had his 2nd (2010), 3rd (2013) and 4th (2017) best seasons during that time.
Whereas Federer's best 4 seasons were prior to 2010!

 

[abmk]

So in theory, Nadal has been the better player in general over that 7-8 year stretch, right?

Ok, but that's not taking into consideration, in that period, Nadal had his 2nd (2010), 3rd (2013) and 4th (2017) best seasons during that time.
Whereas Federer's best 4 seasons were prior to 2010!

of course.

in fact, FEderer's 5 best seasons were prior to 2010 (04-07, and 09)