When you are referring to the SMU’s are you including differences in RA.In my mind PT57A is the epitome of prostock. Most documented, best known prostock, and maybe the most iconic prostock racquet, the holy grail of tennis racquets.
As far as I know, Wilson followed suit with H19 and H22. Then came the prostock Steam series.
Prostock = an exclusive mold and layout that is only available for the pros. Wilson made the H22 available through Pro series but still... I guess you can understand what I mean by prostock. Let's differentiate between Prostock and SMU (Special Make Up/Customized frames).
In my opinion Yonex and Babolat don't have prostocks, they only have SMUs.
Does anyone know better who invented this niche of racquets that is in high demand on the black market and how it developed into what we have today?
LE: I couldn't make my mind for the title and was left with a typo.
Premier Tour was pretty early. On the Wilson side Graf’s 85 and Edberg’s 6.1 even earlier.
That's actually a good point.When you are referring to the SMU’s are you including differences in RA.
The reason why I ask is because there are pros playing with Aero molds but in a 64 RA - not the high numbers we get with the retail sticks.
Dunlop used to offer. A variety of variations on there 200 frames and Volkl had some very different C10’s floating around and even experimental frames. The V10 Catapult in certain forms was playing around with the specs.
Manlikova used the Ultra 2 midsize with Ultra FPK paint job.Premier Tour was pretty early. On the Wilson side Graf’s 85 and Edberg’s 6.1 even earlier.
I used to practice with a top junior in 1996 and 1997 that had Wilson Sponsorship that used the Wilson Pro Staff Classic 85. It was certainly available to other players.Graf's 85 was an extreme pro-stock being neither available to the public nor probably any other pros. Edberg"s 6.1 was just a PSC95 paintjob on a PS85 6.0, which you could get in Europe retail briefly.
I would love to know what the real layup specs of that racket was.I used to practice with a top junior in 1996 and 1997 that had Wilson Sponsorship that used the Wilson Pro Staff Classic 85. It was certainly available to other players.
I will also add that during the wood racket era there many many custom made wood rackets for many pros that played nothing like what you could buy.All I will say is that HEAD was the first company to offer in-house customization for their players if they desired it. It is a service everyone has now copied. This is not a paint job. I will also say that PT57A is not the first pro stock.
And pro stocks have been around since rackets companies have been sponsoring high level tennis players. Jack Kramer didn’t really use a Jack Kramer Autograph. He really used a Don Budge Autograph with the paint of the Jack Kramer Autograph.I will also add that during the wood racket era there many many custom made wood rackets for many pros that played nothing like what you could buy.
I have one of John McEnroe’s actual Pro Stock Maxply McEnroe and I can tell you it’s really a Maxply Fort with a Maxply McEnroe paint job.Dunlop were very transparent here, with Laver and Hoad models available, and separately MaxPly Forts in Laver or Hoad spec if you specially request. This is what we need Wilson to do with a new lighter 330g RF97, that you have to specifically ask for a 340g model if you want.
Nice. I suppose the 3mm thick beach shoulders rather than 1mm fibreglass would reveal it. What's the weight & balance, just out of interest?I have one of John McEnroe’s actual Pro Stock Maxply McEnroe and I can tell you it’s really a Maxply Fort with a Maxply McEnroe paint job.
Cilic uses a Prestige. Berrettini uses an Extreme. Fritz uses a Radical. Zverev uses a Gravity. Sinner uses a Speed.head did not invent it. But they are the most infamous one for never letting a sponsored player use the line they represent. They also have the most number of misrepresentation on your as of today. Djokovic uses a speed and Murray uses a radical right ? LOL.
Also:PT630, original PT280, later re-issued Chinese made PT280, and PT 2.0. By most accounts they all vary a little in feel.
Always two, there are. No more. No less. A mold and a layup.Also:
Radical Trisys 260 MP (Bumblebee)
Radical Tour TwinTube 630 (Candycane)
Vamp Tour 630 (marketed for ladies in Europe)
There’s probably a few more racquets, that were less well known. HEAD didn’t seem to treat the TK57 mold as anything especially exclusive back in the day.
Keep in mind Hewitt, as it turned out, at the end of his career played with a racquet which was from a mold combining aspects of different retail models and even more so he supposedly tested numerous layups. What it shows you is that Yonex can go to great lengths for their players and that they have prostocks.In my opinion Yonex and Babolat don't have prostocks, they only have SMUs.