Sudacafan
Bionic Poster
I am relieved now. Thanks.Nobody in their right mind is counting Laver Cup in head to head. It is an exhibition. Players don't even play three sets.
I am relieved now. Thanks.Nobody in their right mind is counting Laver Cup in head to head. It is an exhibition. Players don't even play three sets.
Well, I was actually there and it was fantastic. If it is fake then they re all great actors. I just find it impossible to imagine that young players like Stefanos, playing in front of Nadal and Federer and a huge crowd, are going to be capable of playing to a script and deliberately losing.
Nobody in their right mind is counting Laver Cup in head to head. It is an exhibition. Players don't even play three sets.
I am relieved now. Thanks.
Some celebration/reaction during the LC looked a bit exaggerated/WWE to me.
It's quite international - met someone coming from South Africa. But I imagine most of the day passes were bought by local people - French was the most common language I overheard, then English and probably Italian after that. I was surprised to not hear much German.Is the crowd mostly Swiss? They sounded very loud. I thought the Swiss were quiet boring reserved people.
It's quite international - met someone coming from South Africa. But I imagine most of the day passes were bought by local people - French was the most common language I overheard, then English and probably Italian after that. I was surprised to not hear much German.
The atmosphere was incredible, honestly. I get why people are doubtful about the team concept - the crowd was cheering for Sasha in the end match but it was nothing like the atmosphere at the two Fed singles. I think there are different things they could do with the format but I guess at the moment they think it's a winner.
I don't want to spam the whole thread with "I was there" but when you are you realise people are talking nonsense on here sometimes, like players can't have normal human emotions. All these people saying "why was Rafa there?" - he was obviously having a great time. And got an amazing ovation from the crowd - he can't not have been moved by that, in Switzerland.
They obviously were upset but I think there was a general acceptance that he could easily have dropped out altogether.Surprised that the crowd was not upset at Rafa and Kyrgios dropping out.
Wasn't Rafa scheduled to play Kyrgios? In any case, Kyrgios' withdrawal was suspicious,
they should also add video games results, like when i bageled the nadal on playstation, with schwartzman.Then they should start including the results of all Exos and while they’re at it player practice matches too.
If we don’t want LC matches in H2Hs, we should start to despise it, before it becomes more important than M1000s.I like LC but they definitely shouldn’t count in h2h
Wasn't it already a Slam???If we don’t want LC matches in H2Hs, we should start to despise it, before it becomes more important than M1000s.
If we don’t want LC matches in H2Hs, we should start to despise it, before it becomes more important than M1000s.
Nadal: "Sheesh, how do you miss that?"
Blue Team (let's call it Team Borg) | Red Team (how about Team McEnroe) |
---|---|
Team Captain -- Borg | Captain -- J-Mac |
Vice-Captain -- Enqvist | Vice-Captain -- P-Mac |
Player 1 (top 5 player) -- Federer | Player 1 -- Nadal |
Player 2 (top 5/top 10 player) -- Medvedev | Player 2 -- Thiem |
Player 3 (top 10 player) -- Zverev | Player 3 -- Tsitsipas |
Player 4 (top 20 player) -- Isner | Player 4 -- Monfils |
Player 5 (top 20 player) -- Goffin | Player 5 -- Schwartzman |
Player 6 (top 30 player) -- Wawrinka | Player 6 -- Kyrgios |
Alternate -- Simon | Alternate -- Tsonga |
Still waiting for that tasty paycheck...Federer must have paid his cronies to skew this poll
As I've said before, a Blue Team and a Red Team would be a much better (but simpler) idea, not that the current tournament is bad in itself. Team layouts would have some restrictions on rank. Here's an example:
Blue Team (let's call it Team Borg) Red Team (how about Team McEnroe) Team Captain -- Borg Captain -- J-Mac Vice-Captain -- Enqvist Vice-Captain -- P-Mac Player 1 (top 5 player) -- Federer Player 1 -- Nadal Player 2 (top 5/top 10 player) -- Medvedev Player 2 -- Thiem Player 3 (top 10 player) -- Zverev Player 3 -- Tsitsipas Player 4 (top 20 player) -- Isner Player 4 -- Monfils Player 5 (top 20 player) -- Goffin Player 5 -- Schwartzman Player 6 (top 30 player) -- Wawrinka Player 6 -- Kyrgios Alternate -- Simon Alternate -- Tsonga
The higher cutoff for the ranking means that the alternates could also be top-quality players. I think a system that doesn't separate based on nationality would allow for more interesting teams.
That's just an example of how the players could be divided based on ranking. Those aren't my serious thoughts of good and bad Laver Cup teams.i dont mind that but can i swap isner for monfils on the blue team, i can then happily support the blue team. also im trying to picture some of the red team players dealing with mcenroe. its weird because i do agree that the europe vs world format (esp if they keep just being n.america and australia) wont hold up much longer, but ive gotten used to certain players just being on the same team together with the same captain, that in my mind one seeing nadal, thiem, and titsipas with mcenroe is just weird, although the idea of nick and nadal on teh same team is hilarious.
That's just an example of how the players could be divided based on ranking. Those aren't my serious thoughts of good and bad Laver Cup teams.
More like their reactions when they watch Djoker crush Vexing Med at AO20 final.Nadal: "Sheesh, how do you miss that?"
Federer: "That was so bad, I cannot even look."
This looks like a pretty good ideaAs I've said before, a Blue Team and a Red Team would be a much better (but simpler) idea, not that the current tournament is bad in itself. Team layouts would have some restrictions on rank. Here's an example:
Blue Team (let's call it Team Borg) Red Team (how about Team McEnroe) Team Captain -- Borg Captain -- J-Mac Vice-Captain -- Enqvist Vice-Captain -- P-Mac Player 1 (top 5 player) -- Federer Player 1 -- Nadal Player 2 (top 5/top 10 player) -- Medvedev Player 2 -- Thiem Player 3 (top 10 player) -- Zverev Player 3 -- Tsitsipas Player 4 (top 20 player) -- Isner Player 4 -- Monfils Player 5 (top 20 player) -- Goffin Player 5 -- Schwartzman Player 6 (top 30 player) -- Wawrinka Player 6 -- Kyrgios Alternate -- Simon Alternate -- Tsonga
The higher cutoff for the ranking means that the alternates could also be top-quality players. I think a system that doesn't separate based on nationality would allow for more interesting teams.
It's quite international - met someone coming from South Africa. But I imagine most of the day passes were bought by local people - French was the most common language I overheard, then English and probably Italian after that. I was surprised to not hear much German.
The atmosphere was incredible, honestly. I get why people are doubtful about the team concept - the crowd was cheering for Sasha in the end match but it was nothing like the atmosphere at the two Fed singles. I think there are different things they could do with the format but I guess at the moment they think it's a winner.
I don't want to spam the whole thread with "I was there" but when you are you realise people are talking nonsense on here sometimes, like players can't have normal human emotions. All these people saying "why was Rafa there?" - he was obviously having a great time. And got an amazing ovation from the crowd - he can't not have been moved by that, in Switzerland.
@Raul_SJ I agree with you completely, but the ATP must be out of their mind because Laver Cup results do now count in official H2H's! The Fed-Isner match is included now in their official H2H. It's appalling to me, but the ATP made the change this year.Nobody in their right mind is counting Laver Cup in head to head. It is an exhibition. Players don't even play three sets.
@Raul_SJ I agree with you completely, but the ATP must be out of their mind because Laver Cup results do now count in official H2H's! The Fed-Isner match is included now in their official H2H. It's appalling to me, but the ATP made the change this year.
https://www.atptour.com/en/players/fedex-head-2-head/roger-federer-vs-john-isner/F324/I186
The main issues is that it's completely lopsided in Europe's favour and ultimately the concept is meaningless. The Davis Cup has a long standing tradition and can help propel country's tennis - well that's the theory anyway. The WTF obviously is a culmination of the year's best (if they all play) and can decide YE#1.
Laver Cup should be an exhibition with lots or proceeds going to charity.
Zverev, Shapovalov and Tsitsipas have Russian roots.Will Russians be placed on Team World? Or Europe?
Were there any Russians playing this year?
No, I think that they are not lying, and that being very sad.No one actually does. Anyone who claims to is lying.