Don't get too carried away

[sureshs]

A Slam win without defeating Nadal or Djokovic has an asterisk after it

 

[donquijote]

There is always a big assterisk behind every Suresh poast.

 

[Sentinel]

A Slam win without defeating Nadal or Djokovic has an asterisk after it

Even if Nadal retired from fear of facing Federer ?

 

[Sentinel]

In space, would sureshs float or fall?

He could go overboard.

Space is not big enough to accommodate Suresh.

There is enough space inside suresh to accommodate suresh.

So say the theoretical A.S.S.trophysicists.

 

[Sentinel]

You really fancy him for Wimbledon this year, do you? I mean like...ummmm...REALLY???

This guarantees that Rafa will get out in the first week.
Oh snap !

Suresh has begun jinxing the grass court season before the clay season has begun !!!

 

[stringertom]

I think Nostradamus surpasses him tbh but I do give him mucho props.

Yes, in a nod to SexiSuri, he pretty much guaranteed a Fritzie bagel to close out Klahn today. Even signed off fedacian style by going, "Go Card!"

 

[Tennis_Hands]

In space, would sureshs float or fall?

There is no space when sureshs is represented.

There.

I also made a joke about him.

 

[VaporDude95]

This is not good for Rafa. Anytime sureshs and meles come with a prediction, expect the opposite to occur.

NUFF said. No Excuses !

Yep. He picked Nadal to win the AO and then later picked Cilic to beat Fed in the final.

Nadal not getting close to Federer is now confirmed

 

[Tennease]

If Nadal wins the rest of the Slams this year, he would have won each Slam at least twice and come to within one Slam count of Federer.

And Nadal is the kind of person who can do it.

 

[Subway Tennis]

If Nadal wins the rest of the Slams this year, he would have won each Slam at least twice and come to within one Slam count of Federer.

And Nadal is the kind of person who can do it.

Time flies. Next AO we will be rooting for Nadal's 20th Slam.

These are big statements sureshs. I hope you're right that he comes back stronger than ever in a few weeks. You're right that if anyone can do it......

For the time being, though, I feel like it would be sour grapes not to acknowledge the Federer win so I give him his due.

In terms of the Australian Open this year, I think the organisers and outside consultants will look into a few decisions made during the tournament that they will need to analyse and review and also a few things that made the tournament not quite as successful as it has been in recent years (some malfunctioning with the ausopen.com web presence after losing the IBM endorsement as an example).

 

[chut]

Time flies. Next AO we will be rooting for Nadal's 20th Slam.

What's the name of the thread again?

 

[merlinpinpin]

If Nadal wins the rest of the Slams this year, he would have won each Slam at least twice and come to within one Slam count of Federer.

And Nadal is the kind of person who can do it.

So, Nadal not winning a single slam this year confirmed by the biggest prophet ever on planet tennis, then?

Good.

 

[Fedforever]

You really fancy him for Wimbledon this year, do you? I mean like...ummmm...REALLY???

I wouldn't be surprised if he skips it. If he does genuinely want to get to 21 then he should focus his efforts on his best slams. Hopefully he won't listen to me!!

 

[Tennisanity]

Fat.

 

[RF-18]

Why are people getting so triggered?

 

[RF-18]

abmk or metsman?

 

[sureshs]

Could Fed have beaten Nadal if he had faced him?

 

[Tennisanity]

Could Fed have beaten Nadal if he had faced him?

Could Nadal have won a set this time? Unlikely.

 

[stringertom]

What's the name of the thread again?

SexiSuri meant to describe the fail when a C130 couldn't get in the air for takeoff with him and his doppelgänger as the only cargo, no?

 

[nikdom]

SURESHS:

 

[Mainad]

I wouldn't be surprised if he skips it. If he does genuinely want to get to 21 then he should focus his efforts on his best slams. Hopefully he won't listen to me!!

Are you talking about Rafa or Fed? I was talking about Rafa.

 

[Fedforever]

Are you talking about Rafa or Fed? I was talking about Rafa.

Yes, I was talking about Rafa skipping Wimbledon.

 

[BHud]

Time flies. Next AO we will be rooting for Nadal's 20th Slam.

"We"? Do you have a mouse in your pocket?

 

[dParis]

SURESHS:

I don't see the need to insult Homer Simpson like this.

 

[R_Federer]

If Nadal wins the rest of the Slams this year, he would have won each Slam at least twice and come to within one Slam count of Federer.

And Nadal is the kind of person who can do it.

What are you smoking? It was Federer who would win 3 slams out of 4 each year with ease from 2004-2007. Not Nadal.

 

[BHServe]

You really fancy him for Wimbledon this year, do you? I mean like...ummmm...REALLY???

Of course he doesn’t. But here one can spew whatever nonsense without any consequenses, and suresh if someone has taken advantage of that ”privilege”