It’s true Federer never got to face a Kevin Anderson in a USO Final , but there was a time he faced a World No.42 with 0 ATP titles at the AO, Federer got to face Delpo just like Nadal in the latter stages of the USO once but that didn’t went well for FedererThat level of arguing was to be expected indeed.
, Okurrr
You don’t think the players of the circuit are afraid of Nadal outside Clay?
Conveniently omitting the fact Fed had a significant back issue which took 10 MPH off his first serve and made his movement look as quick as a tortoise. Be inordinately grateful Fed was injured during the USO since I don't believe your guy fared too well in 2017 when facing him in those four matches.He got to face a Delpo just like Nadal but that didn’t went well for Federer
I'd rather judge a person for the verbal diarrhea that comes from the tip of their fingers than on what location they crawled out of a vaginaThe spanish whiny girls that caused the move from 16 seeds at Wimbledon were long before Nadsy boy.
You should inform yourself before you post.
Also, rampant doping in the country, government supporting dopers, high-ranking officials talking about free doping.
Also, I detest people that are culturally enslaved and defend cheaters at any price. Especially if they go for innocence before the act.
Nothing better at putting a mirror against their faces.
Nadal is small potatoes in whole this (but is part of the picture).
Tbh i was referring to the USO 09 where Federer faced Delpo in the latter stages of the USO and he loss , But Nadal beat Delpo in 2017 , Yes ignoring completely that Delpo was way better in 2009 than 2017 but i’m not taking the discussion seriously.Nadal v Federer in the USO slow courts in a BO5? I will take Nadal , Sadly we will never now who would’ve won if Federer was healthy.
I allege to have money and property abroad (ask someone where that is, or google like I did)
It would be a lie my friend if I tell you that time has healed all fed/nadal fan angst but like you pointed out there are many objective people here and hopefully we reach a point where there is less hatred and more tennis on these forums.
Could you ever do the same for Fed?
Why, is there another easy draw waiting for him at the US Open?
I allege to have money and property abroad (ask someone where that is, or google like I did)
I like to colour in
Federer is the biggest Nadal fanboy around
I wouldn't be surprised if he is going around saying - 23-15 baby!
rafa only loses when he is hurt too.
rafa only loses when he is hurt too.
Would you like to elaborate on this?
20-17
Of course, but I still have to point out areas where his fans exaggerate his greatness. I'd be happy if they just stuck to the facts.
There is a lot more to tennis than winning slams. The total number of slams won is not the point. On average, Rafa's success rate in slams is slightly higher than Fed's - 87% - 86%.
how to take screenshots
It’s true Federer never got to face a Kevin Anderson in a USO Final , but there was a time he faced a World No.42 with 0 ATP titles at the AO, Federer got to face Delpo just like Nadal in the latter stages of the USO once but that didn’t went well for Federer
It will not stop you to throw dirt at him at the first chance.
There is a lot more to tennis than winning slams. The total number of slams won is not the point. On average, Rafa's success rate in slams is slightly higher than Fed's - 87% - 86%.
Federer
Nadal
Bloody youngsters
There is a lot more to tennis than winning slams. The total number of slams won is not the point. On average, Rafa's success rate in slams is slightly higher than Fed's - 87% - 86%.
Federer
Nadal
You don't like logic so you stopped reading because you want to keep the blinkers over your eyes. I understand. I don't know where you read that the only thing that matters is winning slams. I am not unique in looking behind the numbers, perhaps you'll have more patience with ESPN. ESPN has now come to their senses and soon others will see the light.
It will not stop you to throw dirt at him at the first chance.
You're a funny poster, but you might have the most common sense out of anyone here.
The problem is that Federer is going to retire with that number and Nadal still has lots of Slams to play. Each time he doesn't win a Slam his numbers goes down.
