Federer is 1st or 2nd in most semifinals, finals, wins at the 5 biggest tourneys

[McEnroeisanartist]

Has anyone else noticed Federer's place at being 1st or 2nd for most semifinals, finals, and wins at the 5 biggest tournaments?

Semifinals
Australian Open - Federer (1), Edberg (2)
French Open - Nadal (1), Federer (2)
Wimbledon - Connors (1), Becker and Federer (2)
US Open - Connors (1), Agassi (2)
Year End Finals - Lendl and Federer (1), Sampras (2)
Federer - 4

Finals
Australian Open - Edberg and Federer (1), Wilander, Lendl, Agassi, and Djokovic (2)
French Open - Nadal (1), Borg (2)
Wimbledon - Federer (1), Sampras and Becker (2)
US Open - Sampras and Lendl (1), Connors (2)
Year End Finals - Lendl (1), Becker and Federer (2)
Federer and Lendl - 3

Wins
Australian Open - Agassi, Federer, Djokovic (1), Wilander (2)
French Open - Nadal (1), Borg (2)
Wimbledon - Sampras and Federer (1), Borg (2)
US Open - Connors, Sampras, Federer (1), McEnroe (2)
Year End Finals - Federer (1), Lendl and Sampras (2)
Federer - 4

 

[helloworld]

Has anyone else noticed Federer's place at being 1st or 2nd for most semifinals, finals, and wins at the 5 biggest tournaments?

Semifinals
Australian Open - Federer (1), Edberg (2)
French Open - Nadal (1), Federer (2)
Wimbledon - Connors (1), Becker and Federer (2)
US Open - Connors (1), Agassi (2)
Year End Finals - Lendl and Federer (1), Sampras (2)
Federer - 4

Finals
Australian Open - Edberg and Federer (1), Wilander, Lendl, Agassi, and Djokovic (2)
French Open - Nadal (1), Borg (2)
Wimbledon - Federer (1), Sampras and Becker (2)
US Open - Sampras and Lendl (1), Connors (2)
Year End Finals - Lendl (1), Becker and Federer (2)
Federer and Lendl - 3

Wins
Australian Open - Agassi, Federer, Djokovic (1), Wilander (2)
French Open - Nadal (1), Borg (2)
Wimbledon - Sampras and Federer (1), Borg (2)
US Open - Connors, Sampras, Federer (1), McEnroe (2)
Year End Finals - Federer (1), Lendl and Sampras (2)
Federer - 4

So what? You've been doing this for how many years now? We understand that Federer is a great player, but there should be a limit to how much you should worship the guy. My advice to you is find some other hobbies to do and your obsession with Federer's so called 'stats' should be under control.

 

[oberyn]

Has anyone else noticed Federer's place at being 1st or 2nd for most semifinals, finals, and wins at the 5 biggest tournaments?

Yes. We just didn't see the need to start a thread about it.

 

[tennisaddict]

So what? You've been doing this for how many years now? We understand that Federer is a great player, but there should be a limit to how much you should worship the guy. My advice to you is find some other hobbies to do and your obsession with Federer's so called 'stats' should be under control.

These stats have not been presented before. The stats show how superior Fed is from the field.

Why are you upset ?

 

[vive le beau jeu !]

Has anyone else noticed Federer's place at being 1st or 2nd for most semifinals, finals, and wins at the 5 biggest tournaments?

Semifinals
Australian Open - Federer (1), Edberg (2)
French Open - Nadal (1), Federer (2)
Wimbledon - Connors (1), Becker and Federer (2)
US Open - Connors (1), Agassi (2)
Year End Finals - Lendl and Federer (1), Sampras (2)
Federer - 4

Finals
Australian Open - Edberg and Federer (1), Wilander, Lendl, Agassi, and Djokovic (2)
French Open - Nadal (1), Borg (2)
Wimbledon - Federer (1), Sampras and Becker (2)
US Open - Sampras and Lendl (1), Connors (2)
Year End Finals - Lendl (1), Becker and Federer (2)
Federer and Lendl - 3

Wins
Australian Open - Agassi, Federer, Djokovic (1), Wilander (2)
French Open - Nadal (1), Borg (2)
Wimbledon - Sampras and Federer (1), Borg (2)
US Open - Connors, Sampras, Federer (1), McEnroe (2)
Year End Finals - Federer (1), Lendl and Sampras (2)
Federer - 4

also... have you noticed Federer's place at being 1st or 2nd as regards the place for being 1st or 2nd as regards the place for being 1st or 2nd as regards the place for being 1st or 2nd as regards the place for being 1st or 2nd as regards the place for being 1st or 2nd as regards the place for being 1st or 2nd as regards the place for being 1st or 2nd as regards the place for being 1st or 2nd as regards the place for being 1st or 2nd as regards the place for being 1st or 2nd as regards the place for being 1st or 2nd as regards the place for being 1st or 2nd as regards the place for being 1st or 2nd as regards the place for being 1st or 2nd as regards the place for being 1st or 2nd as regards the place for being 1st or 2nd as regards the place for being 1st or 2nd as regards the place for being 1st or 2nd as regards the place for being 1st or 2nd for most semifinals, finals, and wins at the 5 biggest tournaments?

he's simply the best.

(just kidding... i like the stat ! amazing career...)

 

[torpantennis]

LOL, Federer is 2nd all time in the semifinals reached, in his WORST SLAM!

 

[Boom-Boom]

Has anyone else noticed Federer's place at being 1st or 2nd for most semifinals, finals, and wins at the 5 biggest tournaments?

Semifinals
Australian Open - Federer (1), Edberg (2)
French Open - Nadal (1), Federer (2)
Wimbledon - Connors (1), Becker and Federer (2)
US Open - Connors (1), Agassi (2)
Year End Finals - Lendl and Federer (1), Sampras (2)
Federer - 4

Finals
Australian Open - Edberg and Federer (1), Wilander, Lendl, Agassi, and Djokovic (2)
French Open - Nadal (1), Borg (2)
Wimbledon - Federer (1), Sampras and Becker (2)
US Open - Sampras and Lendl (1), Connors (2)
Year End Finals - Lendl (1), Becker and Federer (2)
Federer and Lendl - 3

Wins
Australian Open - Agassi, Federer, Djokovic (1), Wilander (2)
French Open - Nadal (1), Borg (2)
Wimbledon - Sampras and Federer (1), Borg (2)
US Open - Connors, Sampras, Federer (1), McEnroe (2)
Year End Finals - Federer (1), Lendl and Sampras (2)
Federer - 4

Impressive :shock:...but not unexpected... for the GOAT

 

[Deleted member 733170]

So what? You've been doing this for how many years now? We understand that Federer is a great player, but there should be a limit to how much you should worship the guy. My advice to you is find some other hobbies to do and your obsession with Federer's so called 'stats' should be under control.

Why should there be a limit and why should you be the one to tell us what that limit is?

My advice to you is to acknowledge that Federer has surpassed Sampras on nearly every conceivable level. Pete knows this and his humility on the matter is what makes hims such a decent fellow.