underground
G.O.A.T.
Unlike last year I don’t think there will be too much a hangover from this loss, should be much easier to get over this one. You can tell from the embrace at the net.
Unlike last year I don’t think there will be too much a hangover from this loss, should be much easier to get over this one. You can tell from the embrace at the net.
I remember all the talks of Fed's possible retirement back then. I think Roger seems happy with his physical condition now and just don't think he will retire this year.
It's a new location so I don't think we know.What are the conditions in Miami? Slower than IW and high bounce ?
That's his MO in most of his big losses the past year. Springs out of the gate looking like a routine win in the opening set and then completely disappears.IW19 final felt like MC14 again. Fed seemed to be on his way to victory after winning the 1st set but lost. I wouldn't put too much importance on this one random loss. He didn't retire in 2014.
Always feel devastated whenever Roger loses a big final. I know at this stage of his career everything is a bonus but a final loss is always hard to swallow I have to admit, just a very personal thing for me. It helps to know he is able to take this loss better than IW 18 and hopefully it won’t have last year’s sliding slope effect for him this year around.
Finger crossed he picks up some points at Miami! Surely he can’t do worse than last year??
He lost the first time he played in London in 2009 and the first two times in YEC Shanghai 2002 & 2005I hear ya. No confirmation yet, but I'm hearing the conditions, medium-slow CPI, might be slightly faster than IW19. It's a new venue, and I think Fedr has a history of doing well in new places/conditions (i.e. blue-clay Madrid win, Istanbul win, London-WTF, Shanghai-WTF win?, Stuttgart SF?, etc.).
I'm optimistic. I can see him winning IW19 and flopping at Miami19, but by him NOT winning IW19, he 'may' win Miami19 and net more points total bc of the hunger of losing IW19.
We'll see .
He lost the first time he played in London in 2009 and the first two times in YEC Shanghai 2002 & 2005
Talk about overreacting. You talk about realism, but you need to lower your expectations from Fed. He’s no longer 25 years old. Surprisingly, losses become more and more frequent as he ages. Just enjoy watching him while he’s here and stop over analysing and being so pessimistic. You’ll regret it later on, trust me.Seeing a lot of blind optimist here which is surprising. Fed has a deep routed issue now that will become incredibly hard to overcome at his age. The first top player he faces in an event, he loses. He is losing practically EVERY match against a top tenner that is tight. He’s so unclutch right now, and that’s not something that he can just flick the switch on again. Yeah at this point everything is a bonus, but the writing is on the wall. If you cannot win a Masters title on a hard court against Thiem of all players (credit is due, he played very well of course) then I have a tough time seeing where something will open up for him again this year.
The importance of this match I don’t think should be overlooked. A title removes all his shackles and would have allowed much more freedom for him. Now he’s still chasing a big win over a big player in a BIG tournament. Since winning Australia last year, his losses in big matches against top players and/or finals:
del Potro - Indian Wells Final (3rd set breaker)
Halle - Coric (set points first set)
Wimbledon - Anderson (10-8 in the fifth)
Paris - Djokovic (again 3rd set breaker)
AO - Tsitsipas (set points for 2-0 lead, 0/12BP)
Indian Wells - Thiem (7-5 in the third)
This is not even to mention the Kokkinakis and Millman monstrosities.
2017 gave us everything and none of us can complain at all. But a sense of realism is needed here.
Well, well, well. That's good news if things pan out:
Sure it’s good news, but 40 ain’t so far away.
Here is what people don't see: the greatest players in the game win about 60% of all games on a surface they are strong on, and in fact this goes even higher, but not very much for a year. I'm talking about the great ones, like Sampras, Agassi, the big three, and at times even Murray. That's the bottom line.I keep hearing the same thing every time Federer steps on court these days: "he will break the shackles, if he wins this and that title". I believe this to be looking at the situation from the wrong angle. When he won in Australia in 2018 that was supposed to "break the shackles". We saw what transpired in IW after that. Then he was supposed to "break the shackles" when he won in Stuttgart on grass. We saw what happened in Halle and Wimbledon, then the same in Basel for the incoming indoor season. Same story, and most recently it was supposed to "free" him after he wins his 100th tournament.
The truth is that Federer cannot sustain his level as he used to and even when he is playing well he loses quite a bit until he reaches the top players in the later rounds. It has little to do with him not being clutch. All these players you mention were on fire in those matches, that is why they won them (mostly). Especially your example with the IW match against Thiem is indicative: most of Federer's chances to win it were in the second set, and they were to take the early lead. The third set Thiem was blowing Federer off the court, even if he created some chances there.
That is the thing, if the match is tight the opponent also is playing very well. It is not like he lost matches against players that were playing like crap.
The optimism is related to the fact that Federer can play great in any given match, and until that stops being the case he will have chances. Also, I don't think that anyone is expecting much from him at this point. It is mostly well wishes that he plays well, and if it happens he can/will win.
3 of which were Masters. Sigh. Could have been at 30.One thing is for sure after yesterday. Reaching 109 titles is not one of his sponsorship goals.
4 finals lost since AO18.
He will turn 39 and start 40 around Tokyo 2020, so that is nothing new (that info was already confirmed when he signed the extension of his contract with the tournament in Basel).
For now that tournament (Basel in 2020) remains the main candidate for his farewell tournament, if he really wants to hang it soon.
3 of which were Masters. Sigh. Could have been at 30.
I keep hearing the same thing every time Federer steps on court these days: "he will break the shackles, if he wins this and that title". I believe this to be looking at the situation from the wrong angle. When he won in Australia in 2018 that was supposed to "break the shackles". We saw what transpired in IW after that. Then he was supposed to "break the shackles" when he won in Stuttgart on grass. We saw what happened in Halle and Wimbledon, then the same in Basel for the incoming indoor season. Same story, and most recently it was supposed to "free" him after he wins his 100th tournament.
The truth is that Federer cannot sustain his level as he used to and even when he is playing well he loses quite a bit until he reaches the top players in the later rounds. It has little to do with him not being clutch. All these players you mention were on fire in those matches, that is why they won them (mostly). Especially your example with the IW match against Thiem is indicative: most of Federer's chances to win it were in the second set, and they were to take the early lead. The third set Thiem was blowing Federer off the court, even if he created some chances there.
That is the thing, if the match is tight the opponent also is playing very well. It is not like he lost matches against players that were playing like crap.
The optimism is related to the fact that Federer can play great in any given match, and until that stops being the case he will have chances. Also, I don't think that anyone is expecting much from him at this point. It is mostly well wishes that he plays well, and if it happens he can/will win.
To me statistics are only guidelines, when I want to explain to myself something that I noticed while watching tennis. Otherwise they are pretty boring to me and I don't actually pay that much attention, as they are time consuming and not a substitute of watching and thinking for myself, and because they mask more than they reveal.
With that caveat in place I generally agree with your sentiment that Federer's returning game is getting weak, and that prevents him from winning more. His serve is not a guarantee any more, because it gets erratic at the wrong times, and also because when your opponents know what your game is, it is much easier to counter the danger, if it comes from one place only/mostly. It frees them from the mental pressure.
Surfaces do matter too. On grass, where a premium is placed in the serve the whole statistics business might just as easily go out of the window, if the player is holding all the time and can win TBs, and for a player like Federer that is all that matters. It is pretty evident that his overall game is declining pretty hard, so the expectations really shouldn't be of him necessarily winning just because the surface suits him. The opposite, however, is very true: this last week Federer three times made remarks about the extremely slow conditions in IW, something I don't remember him doing with such regularity in recent times. He is in a good place right now, so he reached the final and played well there, so that might have tricked most people into believing that it will be easy for him to win it, since his main rivals are out and it is a HC. A notion against which I warned in the match thread even after he won the first set.
We will see in the coming months what we can expect long term, as I don't think that he will decline much more from his current state till he hangs up his racquet, unless he doesn't decide to play really till he is 45 or something.
Well said.
Fed's level now is pretty good. I'm especially happy to see that he's out of the slump of mid-2018. And I'm not delusional enough to think he'll dominate the tour. But the scary thing is, this newer 'normal level' of Fed is still good enough to win most of the time. I mean, it took peak-Thiem to barely edge Fed, a match Thiem could've easily lost in straights.
And if a few things fall Fed's way? A slam is possible. Ditto for masters, and smaller titles.
Fed's average level is still hard to beat.
It's good to be a Fedfan.
What a great post to read after a long, hard working day!
Thanks!
I feel that it's important to look at the big picture. I mean, at IW19, Fed actually had chances (read BPs) to win the whole tournament in straights, dropping no sets. He still was within 2pts of winning it in the 3rd set against Thiem. Novak lost in 3R, and Rafa refused to step on court against The Oldman, yet so many Fedfans are worried? IW is a 96* players field (but 7 rounds for non-32 seeds), and Fed was in the last match, and almost won the whole tournament in straights. Sure, winning it would've been amazing, but it's not like he stood no chance.
Fed took it well. He was already practicing on Monday, the day after. See my post above with clips.
We Fedfans are in a good place, still.
You make some great points as always chief. I do agree and I've always said, everything from winning the AO two years ago onwards was a bonus. I even remember telling my friend back in 2015 that all I wanted was #18, and then he could lose the first round of every event after and I'd be fine. He's given us much, much more than just #18. And you're correct in saying how well del Potro and Thiem played. Thiem absoloutely peaked in that third set and fully deserved it, no question. But we cannot be naive, whether Fed is 37 or 27. You play 3 Masters finals, a Grand Slam QF and two 4R in the last 15 months. In 2 of those finals, you're two points away at least from winning, you lose both. In the Grand Slam QF, you're 6-2 7-6 5-4 30-40, and you lose. In both Grand Slam fourth rounds you're a set and set points up, again, you lose both. No Fed fan in this world can use the age excuse or he's already won a lot line to justify these loses, becasue they are still frustrating. The fact he turns 38 this year and may very well be a top 3 player by then is beyond belief, that in itself is an incredible acheivement. Being #3 at 37, winning slams at 36, nobody in their right mind believed this would happen.I keep hearing the same thing every time Federer steps on court these days: "he will break the shackles, if he wins this and that title". I believe this to be looking at the situation from the wrong angle. When he won in Australia in 2018 that was supposed to "break the shackles". We saw what transpired in IW after that. Then he was supposed to "break the shackles" when he won in Stuttgart on grass. We saw what happened in Halle and Wimbledon, then the same in Basel for the incoming indoor season. Same story, and most recently it was supposed to "free" him after he wins his 100th tournament.
The truth is that Federer cannot sustain his level as he used to and even when he is playing well he loses quite a bit until he reaches the top players in the later rounds. It has little to do with him not being clutch. All these players you mention were on fire in those matches, that is why they won them (mostly). Especially your example with the IW match against Thiem is indicative: most of Federer's chances to win it were in the second set, and they were to take the early lead. The third set Thiem was blowing Federer off the court, even if he created some chances there.
That is the thing, if the match is tight the opponent also is playing very well. It is not like he lost matches against players that were playing like crap.
The optimism is related to the fact that Federer can play great in any given match, and until that stops being the case he will have chances. Also, I don't think that anyone is expecting much from him at this point. It is mostly well wishes that he plays well, and if it happens he can/will win.
You're right but at the same time is not fun seeing him reaching finals and losing them again and again
You make some great points as always chief. I do agree and I've always said, everything from winning the AO two years ago onwards was a bonus. I even remember telling my friend back in 2015 that all I wanted was #18, and then he could lose the first round of every event after and I'd be fine. He's given us much, much more than just #18. And you're correct in saying how well del Potro and Thiem played. Thiem absoloutely peaked in that third set and fully deserved it, no question. But we cannot be naive, whether Fed is 37 or 27. You play 3 Masters finals, a Grand Slam QF and two 4R in the last 15 months. In 2 of those finals, you're two points away at least from winning, you lose both. In the Grand Slam QF, you're 6-2 7-6 5-4 30-40, and you lose. In both Grand Slam fourth rounds you're a set and set points up, again, you lose both. No Fed fan in this world can use the age excuse or he's already won a lot line to justify these loses, becasue they are still frustrating. The fact he turns 38 this year and may very well be a top 3 player by then is beyond belief, that in itself is an incredible acheivement. Being #3 at 37, winning slams at 36, nobody in their right mind believed this would happen.
But either way, we're all Fed fans becasue we enjoy his game, not just because of his success. That's the bottom line we can all agree on, otherwise from 2013-16 we'd have all left this forum. But I don't think it's bad to hope for another big win from him.
Masters, yes, he lost Cinci18 (terrible form anyways, shouldn't even be in that finals) and IW19. He won Basel18 and Dubai19. All in all, could be better and could be worse. He's still winning finals, just not all, which is normal.
He won a final just three weeks ago.You're right but at the same time is not fun seeing him reaching finals and losing them again and again
How he lost IW18 and IW19 is also encouraging. Both finals were very competitive and several points at the very end made a difference.Masters, yes, he lost Cinci18 (terrible form anyways, shouldn't even be in that finals) and IW19. He won Basel18 and Dubai19. All in all, could be better and could be worse. He's still winning finals, just not all, which is normal.