final gs tally

[mike danny]

Federer's biggest weakness is that he's playing in the weakest grasscourt era of all-time. So his 7 Wimbledons are worth substantially less than Sampras' 7 Wimbledons.

Whereas Nadal is playing in an era known for featuring players with the greatest stamina of all-time and the most consistent baseline skill of all time.....both traits very suitable for clay - therefore this may be the toughest clay era of all-time. Many argue that Federer is an all-time great clay player despite never beating Nadal at Roland Garros. Many argue that Djokovic would trouble Borg on clay, and beat Muster or Guga. And I suspect Ferrer would have won Roland Garros in the 90s.

Fed and nadal did not have strong grass and clay comp. They always had to play each other. Take Fed out and nadal does not have a single clay contender. Except Djokovic whose best tennis is.on HC

 

[Fiji]

Federer 18
Nadal 14
Djokovic 10
Murray 6

 

[THUNDERVOLLEY]

Federer 17 - He has won his slams. Plenty of them.

That has nothing to do with his chance of winning more majors.

Nadal 13 - Way too many already. \

Your hatred of Nadal only reveals the fact you cannot stand his history of beating your Djokovic, particularly the way he handled Djokovic at the 2013 FO and USO.

That is a legacy that will never be erased.

In sharp decline. No more slams.

No evidence of that at all.

Djokvic 10-12 - Clearly he will win more slams than anyone else in the next couple of years.

Wishful thinking.

 

[tennisaddict]

Nadal - 13
Federer - 18
Novak - 11
Murray - 4
Dmitrov - 4
Raonic - 1
Nishikori - 3

 

[heninfan99]

Fed will get #18

 

[NADALRECORD]

I think Federer struggled too much with Murray in Australia (considering Murray was just returning to the tour). I think Murray is favorite for Wimbledon (but I think Nadal can take Murray out).