Head-to-Head: Oscar Wegner & John Yandell

Mountain Ghost

Professional
In the real world having a coach who can hit is quite advantageous..Because they understand by doing - AND they don't need to employ hitters.

Really? Ever seen Macci, Landsdorp or Bollettieri hit? Are you saying pros who only feed balls can't teach at the highest level?

MG
 

Limpinhitter

G.O.A.T.
This is the only fair way to do it - IMHO. A video analysis contest just shows who is 'better' at video analysis. You might be able to correctly critque a problem but have no clue how to 'fix' it in the real world.

Again I don't see how John can participate. Oscar can hit - Yandell can't - isn't this correct? In the real world having a coach who can hit is quite advantageous..Because they understand by doing - AND they don't need to employ hitters.

If Yandell were to employ a hitter - then that's cheating - because Oscar would go out and get someone better and so forth and so on..

Nonsense! What matters is a coach who: (1) understands proper technique and, (2) is able to communicate effectively to his students. Being a great player guarantees nothing. The world is full of former pros and other great hitters who don't understand what they are doing, and can't communicate it effectively if they do. Of course there are great players who are also great coaches. But, one does not necessarily lead to the other.
 

mightyrick

Legend
Really? Ever seen Macci, Landsdorp or Bollettieri hit? Are you saying pros who only feed balls can't teach at the highest level?

MG

He didn't say that. He said a coach who could hit was more advantageous. I would presume he was making that statement in the context of a one-on-one coaching scenario. In that situation, a coach really can't just be a mouthpiece. They ideally have to be a practitioner, as well.
 

JohnYandell

Hall of Fame
5263:

Thank you. I have never claimed to be a world class player. Not quite good enough to make the Yale top 6. Then quit for over 10 years. When I became a teaching pro had a couple of bursts where I was playing Norcal NTRP.

Won 2 Norcal 4.5 tournaments more than 10 years apart, second when I was about 45. Both were 7 matches in one week. If you have been in that mix, you know it's not that easy. Was ranked in the 20s or so in Norcal 5.5. In those days there were huge draws and lots of ex college players in both divisions.

Was ranked in the top 20 3 times in senior divisions.

As for the hitting thing, it's a question of just producing the quality of ball a player needs at his development level. Basic work an Attack Ball machine with spin control is ideal.

You can progress from there to all kinds of feeds and live ball and if you are dealing with college level players or higher find hitters that deliver what the players need.

Coaching and hitting in my opinion are not required to be related.
 
Last edited:

5263

G.O.A.T.
5263:

Thank you. I have never claimed to be a world class player. Not quite good enough to make the Yale top 6. Then quit for over 10 years. When I became a teaching pro had a couple of bursts where I was playing Norcal NTRP.

I was being sarcastic in your favor. I know you played some pretty good ball, lol.
I was saying you would not be at a disadvantage due to that.
Well, least you got to tell us about your play though. Yes, I've played in that mix
and played a fellow who had won several of the bay area 5.0 level championships.
 
so....is the head to head still on? heard in other thread oscar is going on vacation.

My purpose has been accomplished. Now i can take a vacation to view my court at the La Costa WTA. And what a beautiful one at that !!!

See you guys soon.

just great. ended before it even starts. now where will i go for some drama around here. :p
 

GuyClinch

Legend
Really? Ever seen Macci, Landsdorp or Bollettieri hit? Are you saying pros who only feed balls can't teach at the highest level?

Bolleteri uses hitters - how can you evaluate the ability of a coach if you has a team of world class pros hitting with the student?

Is it then the coach or the hitter? That's the problem.. Just hitting with world class players WILL make a player better.

Anyway if you are going to claim the entire 'academy' is part of the coaching process - then of course no one beats Bolleteri - who can't play a lick and isn't really a master on the technical side either..

Again one on one lesson - Oscar will win in a landslide - because he can play. Knowing how to play is a huge advantage. This is pretty obvious everywhere but tennis message boards i guess. Me? If I want to learn how to drive a racecar - I find a guy who can drive. I want to learn to play the guitar - I find a guy who can play music. I want to learn how to lift heavy weights - I find a guy who can lift heavy weights.

Take advice from know it alls who can't do at your own risk..
 
Last edited:

tennis_balla

Hall of Fame
Oh great, now we're back on the old topic that apparently a coach isn't worth two licks if he cannot play.

Let me know when it gets interesting....
 

onehandbh

G.O.A.T.
Bolleteri uses hitters - how can you evaluate the ability of a coach if you has a team of world class pros hitting with the student?

Is it then the coach or the hitter? That's the problem.. Just hitting with world class players WILL make a player better.

Anyway if you are going to claim the entire 'academy' is part of the coaching process - then of course no one beats Bolleteri - who can't play a lick and isn't really a master on the technical side either..

Again one on one lesson - Oscar will win in a landslide - because he can play. Knowing how to play is a huge advantage. This is pretty obvious everywhere but tennis message boards i guess. Me? If I want to learn how to drive a racecar - I find a guy who can drive. I want to learn to play the guitar - I find a guy who can play music. I want to learn how to lift heavy weights - I find a guy who can lift heavy weights.

Take advice from know it alls who can't do at your own risk..

So you would prefer learning to box from
Mike Tyson vs Cus D'Amato
 

GuyClinch

Legend
So you would prefer learning to box from
Mike Tyson vs Cus D'Amato

First thing Cus would do is get you a sparring partner - which is equivalent to a hitter. <g> At that point is Cus teaching you or the partner?

It's the partner - don't be fooled. Nothing will make you learn faster then get smacked in the head when you screw up..
 

5263

G.O.A.T.
Take advice from know it alls who can't do at your own risk..

We all know that "know it alls" are pretty useless, but the best coaches are
usually ones who fell a little shy on big talent.
Superstar talent is rarely a great coach, but a guy who was struggling to be
great and didn't have it....they tend to learn a lot about their sport on that
path.

Like a guy who was just a step slow and small for football is often where the best
coaches come from.
 

5263

G.O.A.T.
but the best coaches are
usually ones who fell a little shy on big talent.
Superstar talent is rarely a great coach, but a guy who was struggling to be
great and didn't have it....they tend to learn a lot about their sport on that
path.

Like a guy who was just a step slow and small for football is often where the best
coaches come from.

Not to judge, but Oscar's history is something like that. Maybe what he was
missing was not talent, but good coaching, so that is what he wants to be
sure others can get.
 

r2473

G.O.A.T.
First thing Cus would do is get you a sparring partner - which is equivalent to a hitter. <g> At that point is Cus teaching you or the partner?

It's the partner - don't be fooled. Nothing will make you learn faster then get smacked in the head when you screw up..

so let me get this straight.......

once cus finds a big prison thug to beat the hell out of me, i can get rid of cus and just get smacked around by this thug?

and if i get hit often enough, i'll eventually be heavyweight champion?

have you tested this theory of out on yourself?

Take advice from know it alls who can't do at your own risk..

my bad. carry on...............
 

onehandbh

G.O.A.T.
Not to judge, but Oscar's history is something like that. Maybe what he was
missing was not talent, but good coaching, so that is what he wants to be
sure others can get.

I agree, sometimes being born a little shy in athletic genes
can make you work harder and explore every possible way
to improve.

If you wanted to make it as a wide receiver in the NFL or
see how much you can improve, you could learn a lot
from someone like Steve Largent. He was slow, not very
tall, and couldn't jump high but he was a student of the
game and grew to understand it ways many receivers to
This day still don't. At the same time he also maximized
his physical potential and stayed healthy.

The results speak for themself. He became one of
The greatest receivers of all time in the NFL.

I think some of the important qualities of a good coach are:
Able to inspire students, is a student of the game themselves
and always open to learning from others in order to continually
Improve and evolve, has deep personal understanding and
Awareness of the game & techniques, is able to work with the
unique strengthens and idiosyncrasies that the student may
have, which could actually one day become a new evolution
in technique -- e.g. Fed's straight arm forehand.
 
P

Playnice

Guest
I think some of the important qualities of a good coach are:
Able to inspire students, is a student of the game themselves
and always open to learning from others in order to continually
Improve and evolve, has deep personal understanding and
Awareness of the game & techniques, is able to work with the
unique strengthens and idiosyncrasies that the student may
have, which could actually one day become a new evolution
in technique -- e.g. Fed's straight arm forehand.

Good job describing Oscar Wegner to a T!
 

tennis_balla

Hall of Fame
I think some of the important qualities of a good coach are:
Able to inspire students, is a student of the game themselves
and always open to learning from others in order to continually
Improve and evolve, has deep personal understanding and
Awareness of the game & techniques, is able to work with the
unique strengthens and idiosyncrasies that the student may
have, which could actually one day become a new evolution
in technique -- e.g. Fed's straight arm forehand.

Good job describing John Yandell to a T!
 

maverick66

Hall of Fame
And so it begins. OR has it already begun I dont know I have lost interest in the MTM threads they bore me a little these days. Its all Oscar did this and John did that. I miss the old days of hit with spinny boards and be a god.
 

onehandbh

G.O.A.T.
...
and always open to learning from others in order to continually
Improve and evolve...
But I thought that MTM hasn't changed since it's initial inception?
Or is there a new update to the book coming soon, with corrections,
addendums, etc. and incorporating the new things Oscar has learned
in the last few decades?

...is able to work with the
unique strengthens and idiosyncrasies that the student may
have, which could actually one day become a new evolution
in technique -- e.g. Fed's straight arm forehand.
If a new book came out, it should probably include a correction to the
previous claim that straight arm forehands have less power. Overall,
though, I think straight arm is harder to learn and have good timing
and it's probably better to teach a double bend forehand.

Good job describing Oscar Wegner to a T!
He does seem like a guy that is passionate about the game and really
wants his students to learn and improve. I can see it in his videos.
He even sent me a free video on footwork for free! I'll have to watch it
again. I like some of the things in it.
 

connico

Rookie
And so it begins. OR has it already begun I dont know I have lost interest in the MTM threads they bore me a little these days. Its all Oscar did this and John did that. I miss the old days of hit with spinny boards and be a god.

lol I want to get the spinny board just for ***** and giggles...
 
If a new book came out, it should probably include a correction to the
previous claim that straight arm forehands have less power. Overall,
though, I think straight arm is harder to learn and have good timing
and it's probably better to teach a double bend forehand.

are there any books out there now that teaches the straightarm forehand? i havent read many but i've never ever seen it referenced or even mentioned.

fed and nadal have been on the tour for more than 10 years now, you'd think that the many world class coaches and experts would have taken notice and come out with a new book that sheds some light on it by now.

could oscar wegner or john yandell show us the light one of these days? i doubt it since they've been at it since...well.. forever lol :p
 
Last edited:
P

Playnice

Guest
lol I want to get the spinny board just for ***** and giggles...

Have you used it yourself and/or with your students? It is an excellent tool and those who have actually utilized it understand its benefits.
 

sureshs

Bionic Poster
lol I want to get the spinny board just for ***** and giggles...

Get 2 ironing boards and fold and put them back to back. Then you and your opponent can hit topspin at each other all day long. Get a nice padded cover for the ironing boards and your racquet will not get scratched.
 

maverick66

Hall of Fame
lol I want to get the spinny board just for ***** and giggles...

It was a good one that the MTM worshipers tried to push. I miss stuff like that. It was always good for a laugh when they came back with we use it so it works. Then hey so who has it produced gets asked and no answer is given. Than you get a video of pros saying this is what it produces yet not one pro has used it ever so ya its a great laugh.

Come on MTM you use to be funny what happened.
 

tennis_balla

Hall of Fame
Golf has by far the most gimmicks in terms of training tools. I'm waiting for someone to come out with something that is as embarrassing as the Shake Weight but for tennis, then I'll truly die laughing.
(For those unfamiliar with Shake Weight, Youtube is your friend)
 

dak95_00

Hall of Fame
I wouldn't know what a Shake Weight was if it weren't for my brother. There is a guy in one of the commercials that everyone is convinced is my brother. Someone even bought him a Shake Weight so he could act it out more.

Great stuff!
 
P

Playnice

Guest
Get 2 ironing boards and fold and put them back to back. Then you and your opponent can hit topspin at each other all day long. Get a nice padded cover for the ironing boards and your racquet will not get scratched.
I repeat, "Have you used it yourself and/or with your students?"

Those who utilize the topspin board know what a good tool it is by their own experience.

If your (honest) answer is "no", then how can you rationally evalutate something about which you know nothing? There is a word for an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason: prejudice.
 
P

Playnice

Guest
It was a good one that the MTM worshipers tried to push. I miss stuff like that. It was always good for a laugh when they came back with we use it so it works. Then hey so who has it produced gets asked and no answer is given. Than you get a video of pros saying this is what it produces yet not one pro has used it ever so ya its a great laugh.

Come on MTM you use to be funny what happened.

I repeat, "Have you used it yourself and/or with your students?"

Those who utilize the topspin board know what a good tool it is by their own experience.

If your (honest) answer is "no", then how can you rationally evalutate something about which you know nothing? There is a word for an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason: prejudice.
 
P

Playnice

Guest
I wouldn't know what a Shake Weight was if it weren't for my brother. There is a guy in one of the commercials that everyone is convinced is my brother. Someone even bought him a Shake Weight so he could act it out more.

Great stuff!

Have you used it yourself and/or with your students?"

Those who utilize the shakeweight know what a good tool it is by their own experience.
 

5263

G.O.A.T.
lol I want to get the spinny board just for ***** and giggles...

You should strongly consider getting one. I think it would help your Fh and likely
Mav66 as well.
Of course even the best tools are wasted in fools hands, so it would be what you
make of it.
You might be surprised.
 

5263

G.O.A.T.
If a new book came out, it should probably include a correction to the
previous claim that straight arm forehands have less power. Overall,
though, I think straight arm is harder to learn and have good timing
and it's probably better to teach a double bend forehand.

.

What do you want to hear about the straight arm?
Haven't most of the biggest Fhs measured been Double bends?
Gonzales, Murray, and Blake?
Thanks for correcting if I'm off on this, as I don't keep up with these things.
Fh max speed is way overrated IMO.
 

JohnYandell

Hall of Fame
tennis hd,

Aside from my hobby posting on this board (second in my mind by far to fly fishing for wild trout) I've been writing about the arm positions for about 8 or 9 years on Tennisplayer, comparing Fed to Nadal to Agassi etc etc.

Those terms are actually mine--double bend and straight arm, coming from the earlier Tennisplayer articles and even before.
 

Cheetah

Hall of Fame
the terms 'double bend' and 'straight arm' are yours? that's pretty cool.

i need to come up with some nomenclature of my own. maybe i can plant some seeds here and there to get people to say 'pat the cat' instead of 'pat the dog' since i have a cat.
 

maverick66

Hall of Fame
Golf has by far the most gimmicks in terms of training tools. I'm waiting for someone to come out with something that is as embarrassing as the Shake Weight but for tennis, then I'll truly die laughing.
(For those unfamiliar with Shake Weight, Youtube is your friend)

The shake racket. You might have just stumbled upon something there. It massages the ball with vibration action. Playnice would love it as it uses the MTM ideals of massaging balls.

the shakeweight is awesome

Sad thing is, it might work. Vibration training might actually be a good tool but nobody can look at thing and not think bad thoughts.
 

r2473

G.O.A.T.
the terms 'double bend' and 'straight arm' are yours? that's pretty cool.

i need to come up with some nomenclature of my own. maybe i can plant some seeds here and there to get people to say 'pat the cat' instead of 'pat the dog' since i have a cat.

i like to say 'spank the monkey'

(maybe we're not talking about the same thing)
 
P

Playnice

Guest
The shake racket. You might have just stumbled upon something there. It massages the ball with vibration action. Playnice would love it as it uses the MTM ideals of massaging balls.



Sad thing is, it might work. Vibration training might actually be a good tool but nobody can look at thing and not think bad thoughts.

Vibration? You don't even get the device. I guarantee you couldn't use the shakeweight for 5 minutes; when you can then you can make fun of it - you will have big enough biceps to have earned the right to mock. Until then, keep thinking those bad thoughts...
 
Top