I run backhard, not shuffle, as instructed in tennis magazine.
Do I hit with an open stance or a close stance for an inside-out forehand?
Is your momentum going toward left, or do you try to change direction and hit forward?
Bill,
I'm sure you didn't mean it, but the terms "Speedy Gonzalez" and "Deputy Dog" are seen as pejorative, and for some maybe racist illustrations of groups of people. I was raised in latin america so I am very familiar with the first term. And I'd be more than happy to hear your thoughts on me personally through my website email address instead of seeing them on message boards. Let's hit a little, critical, and specific criticism is beneficial. Thanks. Hope Idaho is working out for you.
Bill,
I'm sure you didn't mean it, but the terms "Speedy Gonzalez" and "Deputy Dog" are seen as pejorative, and for some maybe racist illustrations of groups of people. I was raised in latin america so I am very familiar with the first term. And I'd be more than happy to hear your thoughts on me personally through my website email address instead of seeing them on message boards. Let's hit a little, critical, and specific criticism is beneficial. Thanks. Hope Idaho is working out for you.
I wasn't aware that by virtue of using "Speedy Gonzalez" and "Deputy Dog" BB was in any way espousing any "thoughts on you personally." I guess I should get my panties in a twist anytime I hear someone say "Russian bear," and my Florentine friend should run home crying "MaMA'!" at the mention of the "Itallian Stallion."
If I was racist I would using other more explicit names then Speedy Gonzalez and Deputy Dog. Plus, Speedy and Deputy were of different nationalities. LOL
All agree, BB has no racial tone in his choice of words. So let me get back to my question.
On my question, do you side shuffle or do you back-pedal?
I think it probably make no difference. I think the key is the angle of shot relative to the body position. If I am hitting forehand crosscourt facing forward, then I should turn 90 degrees to hit the inside-out forehand. I can back-pedal to make this 90 degree turn or I can make a semi-C shuffle for this 90 degree turn.
Now, which foot is my initiation step? Do I drop step with my right foot behind my left foot, Or do I use a big power left foot shuffle to initiate this inside-out footwork?
You might say it makes no difference. But if I have to choose one pattern to engrain into my muscle memory, which way should I go?
All agree, BB has no racial tone in his choice of words. So let me get back to my question.
On my question, do you side shuffle or do you back-pedal?
I think it probably make no difference. I think the key is the angle of shot relative to the body position. If I am hitting forehand crosscourt facing forward, then I should turn 90 degrees to hit the inside-out forehand. I can back-pedal to make this 90 degree turn or I can make a semi-C shuffle for this 90 degree turn.
Now, which foot is my initiation step? Do I drop step with my right foot behind my left foot, Or do I use a big power left foot shuffle to initiate this inside-out footwork?
You might say it makes no difference. But if I have to choose one pattern to engrain into my muscle memory, which way should I go?
As BB said, going with what feels most comfortable in this case may be your best bet. Watching Nadal, he seems to run backwards to 'step around' his backand. Then again, that guy probably goes backwards at 40mph, so he can do it. Most players (Fed included) move laterally to get around the ball.
Bill, that's mother's skirt btw. On a serious note, since you won't email me directly and you offer no contact info behind your handle if you haven't contacted Vic in some time please do so, he'd love to hear from you.
BTW Markps
do you suffer from tennis elbow?
You don't get it, do you? Email Vic, say hi. Read between the lines.
How right you are 1171. I looked at 6 Agassi clip and 9 Fed clips on tennisone.com. There seemed to be 2 ways. In 10 clips the back foot (or farthest foot, or right foot since their righties) lifted off the ground first and came closer to the other foot. Here the other foot acted as the pivot point and pushed the player to get around the b/h (and then sidestep). This is like when sidestepping where you sidestep and one foot is down (inside foot here) and you bend and push off of it as the outside foot comes into it for another sidestep (and then the inside foot lifts off the ground). In 4 clips the back foot pushed and it starts the sidestep, and in 1 Agassi clip he did a gravity step with the left foot and crossed over in the front with the back (right) foot before swiveling himself around. The clip you offered on virtual tennis does not show a closed stance at the end, she is open, and you'll notice 2 other things, her feet remain very much apart when she does the burst and sidestep into position, unlike Fed and Agassi where their feet come together a lot more, and in her finish you will see, unmentioned, her back foot coming forward into the court if you look at the baseline, which is one of two ways to finish this. The other way to finish it is off the front foot.
It seems to me the only thing to ingrain is the ability to be light on your feet to help you when doing this move, and you need to be lighter on your feet when hitting the ball out of this position. In this manner your body, on its own, will select one of both ways to move the feet. If you find yourself stuck on one form then practice the other to develop the habit, allowing your body to choose. The springing up into the ball at the end is a rhythm and weight transfer thing since you are not moving the feet into the ball, if you hit with your body weight down low to the ground it doesn't work so well. A tip to accomplish all of this is to be on your toes at all times. Hope this helps.
Actually, for training purposes, being light on your feet is not the only thing a player needs to have or understand about the inside-out forehand.
First off, being light on your feet is something you are or you are not. You don’t ingrain being light on your feet.
[/COLOR]
Actually being light on your feet is a consequence of running on your toes, if you run on the balls of your feet less of your foot makes contact with the ground and a quieter noise is made, it's like the difference between the noise made when you click your fingers and when you clap your hand.
It's important to run on your toes because if you land on your heel, (very extreme and unusual), or as is most often the case, on your entire foot, you will have to waste a precious milisecond shifting your weight back to your the ball of your foot so you can push off.
An example of a person who runs on their toes is Federer, an example of someone who lands flat on their foot is Roddick.
However, being light on your feet is also part of being light yourself. Tough to be light on your feet when you are heavy in the mid-section. In order to be light on your feet a player needs to be in shape so they can sustain being light on their feet throughout the match. Inside-out forehands are hit at various times in the match and you either are on your toes or you are not. You are either light on your feet or you are not.
Being light on your feet is a characteristic of a player which is built on other factors that ALLOW them to be light on their feet.
I don't know, I was inclined to think that myself until I saw a footballer called maradonna, he was unbelievably heavy for a professional soccer player,and unbelievably nimble and quick, there's also a rugby player called brian o driscoll who has a similar physique and speed.Obviously if you're tired due to being unfit, no matter how well grounded your running technique is you aren't going to be able to move quick enough to get to the ball and ift this is what you meant by being light on your feet, ie, quick to react, then I definitely agree
Thank you all for the more informative answers.
What is that backhand debate all about? What parts of backhand need to be debated?