"I believe I can do it. It doesn't matter where it is." - Roger Federer on winning Slam no.18

edberg volleys

Hall of Fame
By Paul Newman in Monte Carlo

Roger Federer is returning to competition here at the Monte Carlo Rolex Masters after a break of more than 10 weeks following knee surgery, but he is already thinking ahead to the biggest challenges he will face this summer.


The 34-year-old Swiss is hoping that by the time he returns to Wimbledon for his 18th successive appearance at The Championships he will be back to full fitness.

Federer had surgery after tearing his meniscus the day after his defeat to Novak Djokovic in the semi-finals of the Australian Open in January. His recovery went well and he had hoped to return to action at last month’s Miami Open, but had to pull out due to illness.

At least that misfortune has given him time to prepare here for nearly two weeks at a tournament which comes at a crucial time of the year. For some players there is barely time to draw breath between the start of the European clay-court season here and the climax of the grass-court campaign at the All England Club in July.

There are two more Masters 1000 tournaments on clay next month in Madrid and Rome - though Federer has yet to decide whether to compete in them – and the French Open begins in less than six weeks’ time. After Roland Garros Federer plans to play in the grass-court events at both Stuttgart and Halle before heading to the All England Club.

“For the top guys [Monte Carlo] is maybe an opportunity to play a bit more freely because there is less pressure,” Federer said. “It’s a change of surface for everybody and clay is a big one. If you play the wrong way on clay you pay the price for it. So you have to learn very quickly here, but you have less pressure here because I feel it’s the first one on clay.

b_11_Player_157_AELTC_FE.jpg

Federer will hope to make his 18th successive Wimbledon appearance this summer
“Then for me what’s always been very important is right after Monaco. Just those two weeks I’ve usually taken to get ready for the summer. Then you gear up for whatever comes after that - Paris, the grass tournaments at Halle and Wimbledon. That’s clearly a stretch where you have to be in the best shape because of the five sets.”

Asked whether he thought Wimbledon would be where he would have the best chance of winning his 18th Grand Slam title, Federer said: “I don’t think about it really, because I believe I can do it. It doesn’t matter where it is, because every tournament that I can enter at Slam level gives me that opportunity.

“Clearly I’ve been training super-hard here on the clay and I will do so again after Monaco. Then I’ll decide whether I’m going to play any of the Masters 1000s coming after that – both of them, one of them, or none of them depending on what I think is most important for my mind and my body going forward.

“But I’ve won Paris before and I’ve played so well there over the years as well. Why not there? I definitely think that Wimbledon and the other Slams probably give me a bit of a better chance than the French, but I know that I can play very well on clay as well.”

I believe I can do it. It doesn't matter where it is.

- Roger Federer on winning Slam no.18

Federer has stayed free of injury for most of his career. This is one of the longest breaks he has ever taken during a season, though he insisted that a 10-week absence from the tour was “nothing”.

He added: “If we talk six months maybe then that’s different. And I was in Miami, keeping in touch with the sport. It was six weeks [after my surgery] and maybe at the time the knee wasn’t as good as it is now. But I was winning sets in practice – even if I’m the last to judge by this - with a knee that was still fragile. That shows I wasn’t that far away. But I was injured for six or eight weeks in 2001 between Gstaad and Long Island. And at the end of the season you can also have eight weeks off.”

Federer does not see his recent lack of matches as an issue. “It’s like starting the season, so if you're physically fine and you're fresh mentally - as I am now - there's no reason why you can’t win,” he said.

“Maybe you're lacking a bit in the key moments because your confidence is different. But I have the confidence as I've played well over the past six months. And it's the start of the clay-court season so it’s new for everybody. Here I’ve had lots of time to prepare so I'm really ready for this tournament.”

Had he missed the tour during his absence? “No, not really but I'm also happy to be back,” Federer said. “The goal was to be 100 per cent sure to play here, maybe also in Miami if the knee was already fine. I pushed a lot while training in Dubai to be sure it was worth going to Miami. I wanted to get back on the tour as soon as possible, but unfortunately the virus stopped me playing.”
 

cknobman

Legend
The arrogance of self belief, I mean where does this guy come off??? :rolleyes:
Who does he think he is, Novak Djokovic?????
 

ABCD

Hall of Fame
Federer definitely can do it. He has never played better and only one man can stop him. Federer should have won W2015, USO2015 and AO2016, but he didn't, just because of one man.
 

cc0509

Talk Tennis Guru
Asked whether he thought Wimbledon would be where he would have the best chance of winning his 18th Grand Slam title, Federer said: “I don’t think about it really, because I believe I can do it. It doesn’t matter where it is, because every tournament that I can enter at Slam level gives me that opportunity.

“But I’ve won Paris before and I’ve played so well there over the years as well. Why not there? I definitely think that Wimbledon and the other Slams probably give me a bit of a better chance than the French, but I know that I can play very well on clay as well.”

I believe I can do it. It doesn't matter where it is.

Surely those words are better than saying "it's impossible to beat Djokovic these days" like some other great players are repeating ad nauseam. :rolleyes:

This is the type of thing you want to hear from a great champion regardless of whether he can do it or not.
 
D

Deleted member 743561

Guest
He can win. He just has to avoid mental collapse when he faces Nole again. I'm a Fed fan but it seems that he blows it more than Nole winning
Can Ljubicic's legacy as Fed's coach be improving his breakpoint conversion efficiency? You happen to know how Ljubicic was on those?
 
D

Deleted member 307496

Guest
Federer definitely can do it. He has never played better and only one man can stop him. Federer should have won W2015, USO2015 and AO2016, but he didn't, just because of one man.
Did you start watching tennis in 2014?
 

v-verb

Hall of Fame
Can Ljubicic's legacy as Fed's coach be improving his breakpoint conversion efficiency? You happen to know how Ljubicic was on those?

I don't but I'm hoping he does well. I just want a good match. Fed's got nothing to prove but it would be nice to see him get another Slam
 

mightyrick

Legend
I don't but I'm hoping he does well. I just want a good match. Fed's got nothing to prove but it would be nice to see him get another Slam

Actually, I think Federer is sticking around because he himself feels there is something that he needs to prove. I don't know if it is winning another slam. But he definitely has a pea under his mattress that will not let him rest. And he's not telling us what it is. He's keeping that for himself. And once he proves what he aims to prove... I think he will be done. Extremely soon thereafter.

It could very well be that the final thing that Federer might want to prove is that he can beat prime Djokovic. Maybe because of all of the hype in the media, Federer thinks that his legacy is at stake. To him, perhaps if he beats prime Djokovic at age 34 or 35, it will silence all the naysayers. Regardless of what Djokovic achieves, he still lost to a far past-prime Federer. If Federer had beaten Djokovic in Wimbledon, I think he'd have retired after that.

I wish Nadal had this same kind of drive, but the guy has always approached the game and motivated himself from a perspective of inferiority and self-doubt. It might of served Nadal well in the past, but it is very destructive to him now, IMHO.
 
D

Deleted member 743561

Guest
Actually, I think Federer is sticking around because he himself feels there is something that he needs to prove. I don't know if it is winning another slam. But he definitely has a pea under his mattress that will not let him rest. And he's not telling us what it is. He's keeping that for himself. And once he proves what he aims to prove... I think he will be done. Extremely soon thereafter.

It could very well be that the final thing that Federer might want to prove is that he can beat prime Djokovic. Maybe because of all of the hype in the media, Federer thinks that his legacy is at stake. To him, perhaps if he beats prime Djokovic at age 34 or 35, it will silence all the naysayers. Regardless of what Djokovic achieves, he still lost to a far past-prime Federer. If Federer had beaten Djokovic in Wimbledon, I think he'd have retired after that.

I wish Nadal had this same kind of drive, but the guy has always approached the game and motivated himself from a perspective of inferiority and self-doubt. It might of served Nadal well in the past, but it is very destructive to him now, IMHO.
Nice post. Federer has beaten prime Djokovic eight times since Fed's 30th birthday, though. He even beat him three times last year (at ages 33 & 34). Do you mean taking him out at a major final? I am really not so sure that he needs to leave right after some "crowning achievement." His career looked to be headed down, down, down only a couple of years ago. He has made recent commitments to some tournaments through 2017. At the end of the day though, maybe time with his family will beat tennis. I dunno.
 

mightyrick

Legend
Do you mean taking him out at a major final?

That's exactly what I mean. This isn't like the days of the mid-00's and before where a Masters final was best-of-five. I think Federer is out to cement his legacy. And getting #18 isn't necessarily the thing to do it. But beating Djokovic in best-of-five just might be.

Regardless of Federer's commitments... when he's done... I think he's done.
 

AceSalvo

Legend
Federer has been listening to his crew of kiss a** "Yes Men" for far too long.. This delusional egomaniac is going to stick around until he's 45 thinking he can win another slam.


Give it up Wodgie.

Woe to you Wodgie for consistently Challenging Novak !!

Gramps got to do what a Gramp gotta do, for who else is worthy if not for Gramps..
 

v-verb

Hall of Fame
Actually, I think Federer is sticking around because he himself feels there is something that he needs to prove. I don't know if it is winning another slam. But he definitely has a pea under his mattress that will not let him rest. And he's not telling us what it is. He's keeping that for himself. And once he proves what he aims to prove... I think he will be done. Extremely soon thereafter.

It could very well be that the final thing that Federer might want to prove is that he can beat prime Djokovic. Maybe because of all of the hype in the media, Federer thinks that his legacy is at stake. To him, perhaps if he beats prime Djokovic at age 34 or 35, it will silence all the naysayers. Regardless of what Djokovic achieves, he still lost to a far past-prime Federer. If Federer had beaten Djokovic in Wimbledon, I think he'd have retired after that.

I wish Nadal had this same kind of drive, but the guy has always approached the game and motivated himself from a perspective of inferiority and self-doubt. It might of served Nadal well in the past, but it is very destructive to him now, IMHO.


I think you are spot on. I don't think he needs to prove anything to his fans, but I do agree he wants one last Slam. I really hopes he gets it. And I think if he remains calm and focused he can beat Djokovic. Think of some of his matched up to the Slam finals - he beat down Murray really bad in a recent Slam semi. If he had played that well he would have taken Djokovic.
 

Prabhanjan

Professional
When you are SF-F-F-QF in the 4 previous slams, you have every right to believe that you can win it anywhere, especially when you have won each of them at least once. Fed has one big problem in Nole and apart from Nole, there is no genuine reason to believe that if he goes full throttle, we would be stopped for sure by the likes of Murray, Wawrinka, etc. Somebody should post here the SF scores against Murray and Wawrinka at WO and USO semis.
 

Krish0608

G.O.A.T.
Actually, I think Federer is sticking around because he himself feels there is something that he needs to prove. I don't know if it is winning another slam. But he definitely has a pea under his mattress that will not let him rest. And he's not telling us what it is. He's keeping that for himself. And once he proves what he aims to prove... I think he will be done. Extremely soon thereafter.

It could very well be that the final thing that Federer might want to prove is that he can beat prime Djokovic. Maybe because of all of the hype in the media, Federer thinks that his legacy is at stake. To him, perhaps if he beats prime Djokovic at age 34 or 35, it will silence all the naysayers. Regardless of what Djokovic achieves, he still lost to a far past-prime Federer. If Federer had beaten Djokovic in Wimbledon, I think he'd have retired after that.

I wish Nadal had this same kind of drive, but the guy has always approached the game and motivated himself from a perspective of inferiority and self-doubt. It might of served Nadal well in the past, but it is very destructive to him now, IMHO.

This. I wholeheartedly agree.
 

junior74

Talk Tennis Guru
Federer's love for tennis and competition is inspiring :)

Give us two more slam finals between Federer and Djokovic!
 

Sentinel

Bionic Poster
It could very well be that the final thing that Federer might want to prove is that he can beat prime Djokovic. Maybe because of all of the hype in the media, Federer thinks that his legacy is at stake. To him, perhaps if he beats prime Djokovic at age 34 or 35, it will silence all the naysayers.
aIWMm.gif




Apologies to Sir Chico :D
 

uliks

Banned
And he should do it. Federer not winning a slam in this weak era will be a embarrassment, a big blow to his GOAT aspirations. The weak era beneficiary 29 y/o Oldovic blocking him everywhere also would not fit well in his resume. He is supposed to be a greatest player ever FGS. If all the analysis from the unbiased tennis experts are correct that this is extremely weak era, winning slam should be a piece of cake for the Maestro. How can he be a GOAT if he can't solve this simple weak era:confused:o_O
 
D

Deleted member 716271

Guest
I actually admire Federer's attitude. He seems to really love the game even if he isn't winning slams, while believing in himself to still win. It's a nice balance that you don't always see in fading greats.

I think, of course, he has no shot at the slower slams (AO +RG). I don't know how it would work now considering he's already been off 10 weeks due to the unforeseen injury, but he might be best served by taking the clay season lightly. I saw some suggest he take clay off altogether and practice on grass (like Murray in 2013), that might be extreme. However, as long as he stays in the top 4 for draw purposes, the idea would pique my interest if I were a Fed fan who just cared about him getting another slam.

I think it's quite clear his best shot is at Wimbledon.
 
Top