I like Murray, but the only reason he won two slams = no Gulbis

Hawkeye7

Professional
Forget Nadal. The REAL reason Murray won two slams is that he didn't have to face GOATbis in either of them. The Latvian proved last week that he can easily beat Murray when he is playing at only 10% and Murray at 100. Gulbis made the right decision tanking the real slam to keep his metal edge over Murray for the US Open.

Discuss.
 

Mainad

Bionic Poster
Forget Nadal. The REAL reason Murray won two slams is that he didn't have to face GOATbis in either of them. The Latvian proved last week that he can easily beat Murray when he is playing at only 10% and Murray at 100. Gulbis made the right decision tanking the real slam to keep his metal edge over Murray for the US Open.

Discuss.

Hmmm...so what happened at all the previous 5 occasions when they played?
Was Gulbis playing at less than 10% on all those occasions? :wink:
 

RNadal

Professional
Hmmm...so what happened at all the previous 5 occasions when they played?
Was Gulbis playing at less than 10% on all those occasions? :wink:

He didn't possessed his super ultra beautiful-motion new stylish forehand. That's why.
 

Hawkeye7

Professional
Hmmm...so what happened at all the previous 5 occasions when they played?
Was Gulbis playing at less than 10% on all those occasions? :wink:

He is just a very generous guy. His family has so much money that he only has to try and win matches, when he really feels like it.
 

JK_Nation

New User
Pospisil is overrated too. The only reason he ever won the Vancouver Challenger event is because he didn't have to face Djokovic, Murray, Federer or prime Tilden.
 

ctoth666

Banned
Seriously. You watching Nadal play lately bro? Murray can play as well as he can, and he's not taming that beast. Heck, Djokovic can't even stop him anymore. Nadal is suspiciously good, but whatever: it is what it is. I fear for Federer's life if he scrapes through the next round.
 
Top