If Djokovic loses a set to Federer, maybe even two..

[Sysyphus]

Or maybe even loses the match, against a 37 year-old. What would that tell us given that novack when in his prime didn't lose a set to fred.

week era?

 

[tennisaddict]

It would mean Fred is still playing at peak and constantly improving.

 

[smoledman]

When did Federer become 37?

 

[Deleted member 512391]

Federer is a legendary player, so even if he takes out the 10 times Major champion, who's still in his prime, it would just confirm his status and, IMO, it won't be such a big surprise. It has nothing to do with the weak/strong era nonsense.

 

[Sysyphus]

When did Federer become 37?

on august 8. the yeer after he became 35

 

[jm1980]

Thank you RF-18 for this

 

[Kalin]

When did Federer become 37?

Last year, apparently, if you follow the threads on this forum.

 

[StannisTheMannis]

Or maybe even loses the match, against a 37 year-old. What would that tell us given that novack when in his prime didn't lose a set to fred.

week era?

37? Cmon he had 3 birthdays last week. He's 40 now.

 

[I am the Greatest!]

Or maybe even loses the match, against a 37 year-old. What would that tell us given that novack when in his prime didn't lose a set to fred.

week era?

Novak in his prime didn't just lose sets to Federer, he lost matches.