If/when Federer is overtaken in slams, will he still be considered the GOAT?
The Grand Slam count is the most relevant all-time great criterion. Other criteria are just tie-breakers in case two players are tied in Grand Slams.YEC titles should be considered as well. Assuming the basics like 4 slems per season in BO5 stay in place, if someone overtakes the total Slam+YEC count, sure they likely get the mantle regardless of other comparisons.
DoneMake a poll.
Even if it's Djoko or Nadal? I guess McEnroe and Willander and the whole friggin globe aside from Sampras fans may swallow their words sooner than expected.YEC titles should be considered as well. Assuming the basics like 4 slems per season in BO5 stay in place, if someone overtakes the total Slam+YEC count, sure they likely get the mantle regardless of other comparisons.
Even if it's Djoko or Nadal? I guess McEnroe and Willander and the whole friggin globe aside from Sampras fans may swallow their words sooner than expected.
Premature to have called him the greatest that will ever be?
What is your rationale for that distinction?If its by Djokovic,yes
If by Nadal, No
What is your rationale for that distinction?
The way the OP was phrased, I read your answer the other way around. Just clarifying, not debating.What is your rationale for that distinction?
Okay. The way the OP was phrased, I read it the opposite way. Just clarifying, not debating.Djokovic has less gaps in his resume
By Nadal, maybe
By Djokovic, probably not
Anyone that voted anything but "no" are clearly delusional Federer fanboys.
Please out them.
The Grand Slam count is the most relevant all-time great criterion. Other criteria are just tie-breakers in case two players are tied in Grand Slams.
Grand Slams are more relevant than ATP finals. No amount of ATP finals equal a Grand Slam. Also, the Olympic Gold in singles is equally relevant as the ATP finals and you are failling to mention it.
In sum, if a player overtakes Federer's GS count he has surpassed him. Grand Slams are the most relevant trophies. The GOAT is supposed the best, so he can't not be the best in the most important tournament.
Straight forward GOAT has always been about GS titles....So if someone gets more GS titles, they are the GOAT.
Being overall goat means being the overall best player.
so winning more grand slams would actually dent a resume,
now I've heard it all.
I agree with your point that Federer is not the GOAT.
You talk like this is some kind of sacred, disprovable fact lol. The actuality is no one really cared about who had the most slams until Sampras set out to break the record. Before then top players routinely skipped the AO and amassing the most slams wasn't the big priority.
Being overall goat means being the overall best player. Do you honestly think if Nadal piled on 4 or 5 more RGs without ever winning a single WTF he should be considered overall goat? Asking honestly.
The way he behave himself, both in and outside the court.
Your statement is too sarcastic for my taste.
I voted that it depends. if nole gets 20 then he will be GOAT without a doubt. because he needs 5+ slams. so if he gets them he will surely have more YE#1 and weeks on top than federer. and, he will probably have 5-6 or more WTF and quite a few more masters. then he has 4 slams in a row, points record (16,950), the best season (2015) and completed all big (1000+) tournaments as well as positive h2h with all big4. so in case he gets 20 he will own all the big records that matter. nadal, I'm not so sure that he will.
Cherry picking, no? And in this particular case, what is the problem? That he was more forward, direct and honest with his answer?
Federer is the goat not because of titles, match wins and numbers. The way he behave himself, both in and outside the court. The way he wins his matches. The never ending joy of his to play the game and compete. Federer just has the charisma to be the greatest player.
Djokovic and Nadal as good as they are, are beyond the point at which they could be considered better than Roger. No amount of titles could change that.
Perfect example is the kid at Us Open 17 who asked Roger " why are you the goat " . Thr way he handled that is just pure class
Problem is that he was not in position to judge whether retiring was justified or not as he lacked information about player's condition and he is not a physician. Problem is in kicking someone while he is down. Problem is that, due to his status in the game at that time, his comments were invitation to open season on Djokovic. Problem is that he did not think that this player who is defeated and humiliated would win XX slams and become a major tennis/sport personality on and of the court.
By that logic Borg would be the ultimate GOAT. The most popular player ever in his prime, even more than Federer, he used to wear disguises wherever he went in any country so he wouldnt be mobbed. Definitely the most charismatic and sexy top player ever. And the ultimate in style, perfection, and detail; and an intriguing engima given his retirement and sketchy post tennis career.
They are asking him a question and he is answering it straight forward. People these days are really sensitive and feel judged by everything. He didnt kicked him when he is down, YOUR comprehension makes it like that. At that time Djokovic had like 10 retirements for 4 seasons - since then he had 5 for the next 10 years. I think that Federer was on something, dont you?
Djokovic had serious yet to be diagnosed condition and Federer was not competent to discuss any health issues. Normal answer to that question would be "I am sorry that Djokovic had to retire, I hope that it is nothing serious and I wish him speedy recovery". Worst possible but still relatively decent answer is to say "I would not like to comment that". His answer was out of order and unusual.
Agree to dissagree. At the time when Federer came into the picture tennis has evolved 20 years since Borg and that was before the social media era. Federer and Nadal pretty much on themselfs put tennis on the bigger map. For example: 1st round exit at Wimbledon 2003 - 14 400 euro/ 1st round exit at Wimbledon 2018 - 39 000
There is hardly an argument for Borg being more popular than Federer and that is not a punch against Bjorn. Life just works that way