Is bent arm FH really more stable than straight arm FH?

More stable FH?

  • Bent arm FH

    Votes: 10 66.7%
  • Straight arm FH

    Votes: 5 33.3%

  • Total voters
    15

Jonesy

Legend
Nik from IT is back, bringing amazing concepts like flatspin and other interesting nuggets to justify why Djoker's bent arm FH breaks down less than Alderal's straight arm FH.

 

baowow

Rookie
Mostly agreed. Is not as bent as most people think. Nothing like Iga. Fognini and Nalbandian are very similar. Simple and easy. Most rec players should try to replicate rather than Fed's forehand.
 

ppma

Professional
I agree with Nick, especially regarding the lesser margin for adjustments of fully-extended elbow at 7:10. One of the biggest differences of fh and bh (remarks on 1hbh) is precisely the possiblity to make short-time adjustments once footwork for the approach of the contact point is finished, and semi-bent elbow maximizes this advantage of the shot.
 
Last edited:

Jaferd

New User
I don't think Federer's nor Nadal's arms are locked at the elbow. Infact, most of the time they are slightly bent, especially Federer's. He may be right about Djokovic's forehand being more consistent but I doubt it's because it a bent vs straight arm issue. My 2 cents.
 

Jonesy

Legend
Mostly agreed. Is not as bent as most people think. Nothing like Iga. Fognini and Nalbandian are very similar. Simple and easy. Most rec players should try to replicate rather than Fed's forehand.
In fact i see a lot more players with bent arm FHs at the rec level than straight arm FH. Perhaps it is indeed a more natural movement to the body.
 

AnyPUG

Hall of Fame
Nicola will soon be releasing many videos on why Djokovic has the best backhand, the greatest serve technique and the finest net skills and the best ever drop shots.
He is a fan boy of Djokovic.
 

Jonesy

Legend
Nicola will soon be releasing many videos on why Djokovic has the best backhand, the greatest serve technique and the finest net skills and the best ever drop shots.
He is a fan boy of Djokovic.
No idea, been watching most of his videos since the beggining of the channel and he always striked me as Fed fan even when he claimed to be the biggest Rafa fan. Guess he is just a fan of tennis in general, big 3 being only one part of.

Yet, he never claimed Novak's to be the most powerful FH, only that he valued consistency more in his criteria than just winner count.
 

WeekendTennisHack

Hall of Fame
I'm thinking slightly bent like Fed is even more stable than more bent like Djoker. Think about holding up a wall that's falling down, can you hold it longer with almost straight slightly bent arms or much more bent at the elbow? I would say the former.
 

eah123

Professional
I think most people hit with a bent arm. A straight arm is really an anomaly, like being ambidextrous.

However, most people below 4.0 hit with arms that are too bent. Meaning they are hitting too close to the body, and missing out on the leverage/power/racket head speed that a longer lever arm enables.
 

Jonesy

Legend
I'm thinking slightly bent like Fed is even more stable than more bent like Djoker. Think about holding up a wall that's falling down, can you hold it longer with almost straight slightly bent arms or much more bent at the elbow? I would say the former.
Do you have some video or pic to show the slightly bent arm of Fed FH? I always believed it was a straight arm FH.
 
Last edited:

WeekendTennisHack

Hall of Fame
Do you have some video or pic to show the slightly bent arm of Fed FH? I always believed it was a straight arm FH.
3f8e3a50f7c9765b900f3e05114b5d40.jpg


federer-forehand-grip.jpg
 

Dakota C

Rookie
I agree with Nick, especially regarding the lesser margin for adjustments of fully-extended elbow at 7:10. One of the biggest differences of fh and bh (remarks on 1hbh) is precisely the possiblity to make short-time adjustments once footwork for the approach of the contact point is finished, and semi-bent elbow maximizes this advantage of the shot.
Agreed - I would push even more and say that using a straight arm forehand effectively requires exceptional footwork, whereas you can get away with a lot worse footwork to use a proper bent arm effectively.
 

ballmachineguy

Hall of Fame
There is some bending. I wonder if there is someone who teaches SA FHs for pros that could clarify if this changes anything technique wise.
Maybe, just maybe, he is trying to produce topspin here.
Also, arm has to start bending around contact to keep rhs. Keeping arm straight through contact zone would lead to decel, especially the higher the ball being struck
Let’s look at some more still pictures and make judgements on entire strokes.
 
Last edited:
Top