I can't believe I had to get my butt off the couch to prove you wrong, but here's an example of me going from a ready position for a W Forehand to a ready position for an E backhand without moving any part of my upper body (bar turning my head) whatsoever.I'm not sure if you realize this, but when you turned to your left to go from your forehand stance to your backhand stance, you also rotated your wrist 180 degrees. That's the only way that you can go from palm up on the forehand to palm down on the backhand, meaning your hand going from being on the bottom of the handle to the top of the handle.
That's what you don't get. I don't think your way is wrong and I don't think my way is wrong. It just so happens I feel that the way I do things is easier and as you would say, most efficient. The way you switch grips is perfectly fine, since it works well for you. You switch grips like Federer. Congratulations. I really am happy for you.
I think anybody can do whatever they find the most success with and anything they find to be the most comfortable. No coach will disagree with that. A pro player might laugh at me? I don't give a damn. I don't care if they laugh at me and I sure as hell don't care if you do. Your dissaproval is only affirmation for me at this point.
I think I've made my point in my other posts in this thread and I think you get the jist of what I'm saying, so let it be. Everything that needs to be said by both sides has been said. In fact, you've probably said the same thing 15 times over. We understand your views. Let everyone make their own decision.
I'm not sure if you realize this, but when you turned to your left to go from your forehand stance to your backhand stance, you also rotated your wrist 180 degrees. That's the only way that you can go from palm up on the forehand to palm down on the backhand, meaning your hand going from being on the bottom of the handle to the top of the handle.
I don't get it. Is that your neutral position? Do you wait for the ball with the racquet to your right side and the head of the racquet sticking up to the sky? If you use a Western FH grip, wouldn't you be waiting for the ball with the racquet out in front of you and you holding the handle with your Western FH grip? From that position, you have to rotate your wrist 180 degrees for your backhand if you want to use the same side of your racquet. Again, to go from palm up to palm down, you MUST rotate your wrist 180 degrees at some point. Your hand does not just magically turn over.
OK, let's put it this way. What if no pro that uses a 2HBH ever made it into the Top 100 and all the Top 100 pros all used 1HBH's? Would any teaching pro still teach the 2HBH and/or would anyone even want to learn how to play with a 2HBH? Somehow I doubt it. And wouldn't this prove that the 1HBH is a better way to hit the BH than a 2HBH? And that if you want to become a better player that you should learn the 1HBH?
Now this is the same scenario with not changing grips and hitting with the same side of the racquet. Almost no pros that do it ever make it into the Top 100. So why would you want to do something that the worse players do rather than something that the better players do? Assuming, of course, that you want to become a better player.
Yes, hitting with the same side of the racquet is possible just like using a 2HBH is possible, but if none of the best players do it (as the case with the former), why would you want to do it? Don't you think you're limiting your full development as a player?
Yes, so when you hit a Western forehand and then an Eastern backhand, at some point your wrist had to turn 180 degrees from palm up to palm down, right? Because at contact, the palm is up on the forehand and the palm is down on the backhand, right? Well, that didn't just happen on it own, you had to rotate your wrist for that to happen.
The difference is when you change grips and hit with both sides of your racquet, you rotate (spin) the racquet itself instead of your wrist to get it into the right grip/position to hit your backhand. When you don't change grips and use the same side of your racquet for your forehands and backhands, you instead rotate your wrist to get it into the right grip/position to hit your backhand. You don't rotate (spin) the racquet because you're still gripping it and that's what's meant by not changing grips. You instead rotate your wrist around so that the same face of the racquet is facing the net on your backhand as was on your forehand.Yes, but that's true whether you change from Western FH to pure Continental (as a neutral grip) and then to Eastern BH, or if you don't change grips at all. Pointing out that the wrist is in a different position at contact is one thing; we're not disagreeing (at least I'm not) with that. But this different wrist position exists regardless of how you achieve the grip: it's simply inherent to the differing contact points of the strokes.
@BreakPoint
How many people are actually arguing that there is no arm rotation involved. I say arm rotation to include every part of the arm, not just the wrist... because it can't rotate by itself, it's actually a hinge.
I use an eastern forehand grip so I'm never palm up. (I also use eastern backhand grip.)
Rotating your wrist is the same as rotating your forearm and vise versa. It's the same thing. You cannot rotate one without the other. (Of course, we're talking about rotating your wrist and forearm around the long axis that goes up and down your forearm.)
It is much more stressful to your wrist to rotate your wrist while gripping the racquet handle than it is to release your grip and then rotate the racquet handle instead within your hand.
Yes, so when you hit a Western forehand and then an Eastern backhand, at some point your wrist had to turn 180 degrees from palm up to palm down, right? Because at contact, the palm is up on the forehand and the palm is down on the backhand, right? Well, that didn't just happen on it own, you had to rotate your wrist for that to happen.
The difference is when you change grips and hit with both sides of your racquet, you rotate (spin) the racquet itself instead of your wrist to get it into the right grip/position to hit your backhand. When you don't change grips and use the same side of your racquet for your forehands and backhands, you instead rotate your wrist to get it into the right grip/position to hit your backhand. You don't rotate (spin) the racquet because you're still gripping it and that's what's meant by not changing grips. You instead rotate your wrist around so that the same face of the racquet is facing the net on your backhand as was on your forehand.
Funny thread. Goes to show that trying to describe something via the written word is not the way to go when talking tennis mechanics..a picture paints a thousand words and all that abba dabba
In any case, I've been following along a bit and would like to contribute.
I think people are stuck in the semantics of the thing, and it would seem that several people didnt understand what BP was asking in his poll or surely not nearly as many would have said it is 'proper'. Using the word 'proper' threw the monkey wrench into the thing I think, and wasnt a good choice of words.
Funny thread. Goes to show that trying to describe something via the written word is not the way to go when talking tennis mechanics..a picture paints a thousand words and all that abba dabba
In any case, I've been following along a bit and would like to contribute.
I think people are stuck in the semantics of the thing, and it would seem that several people didnt understand what BP was asking in his poll or surely not nearly as many would have said it is 'proper'. Using the word 'proper' threw the monkey wrench into the thing I think, and wasnt a good choice of words. I would assume that people would exclude those who flip or twirl their racquet in their hand between shots
In my experiences having given a few thousand lessons and having been around the tennis block, I have seen one person hitting the ball on the same side of the stringbed for forehands and backhands. he was very hard to teach, but played around the 4.5 level doing this. his grip was more like a continental. to hit a backhand he would invert the racquetface and chop down on the ball..he even could do this with backhand volleys somehow, and his serve was kind of a slice serve that sliced the opposite direction from 'normal'..or should i say 'proper'.?? Anyway, the guy could smoke his forehand, the backhand had this crazy hard slice on it, and his serve was hard to figure out for people who hadnt ever seen something like that before...does that make what he was doing proper? well, for him it was, but i would say that playing with one side of the stringbed would be in the area of an anomoly....you all can decide if that makes it proper or not....but only one case of this over the years speaks for itself. I wasnt going to reinvent his wheel, so i just worked around his grips and most unusual style. Other posters mentioned Berasetagui doing this and his grip must have been the opposite of this guy I am talking about and very extreme
As for me, my racquets have an 'up' and 'down' side to them. Is that proper??? Maybe I'll start a poll about this
man, this 180 degree stuff is driving me crazy too.
You keep saying you have to go from palm-up to palm-down and that's 180 degrees, no matter what if you're using Semi-western forehand and a 1hbh, you're going from palm-up to palm-down. This is true no matter which style you are playing.
You have to look at it like this Breakpoint, if you are hitting with the same side of the racquet, you are doing the same thing as if you are hitting with both sides, except for the following changes:
Most likely your ready position grip is not Continental, it is probably Semi-western forehand grip, and the racquet is being held in the SAME position as with Continental, out in front of your body, racquet held with the racquet face perpendicular to the ground.
When you go to either forehand or backhand side, you are doing the SAME thing as when you start with Continental, except maybe forehand side you don't have to switch grips. On the backhand side, you follow the SAME unit turn with the ONLY difference being that you rotate the racquet handle a different direction, i.e. clockwise or counter-clockwise. EVERYTHING ELSE IS THE SAME.
You hit, you return to ready position. You hit again.
the ONLY difference is which direction you rotate the racquet on the grip change. In some rare cases, there may not even be a grip change. There is no change in the stress on your hand or wrist, you do the same motions for either style of play. You hit, you return to ready position. If there is a grip change, you are rotating the racquet within your hand.
Please try to understand what we are saying, this is getting out of hand.
SOMEBODY NEEDS TO POST A VIDEO SHOWING THAT THIS IS POSSIBLE!!!!!!
Stand facing the net, now hold your racquet in a Western FH grip and stretch your arm out to your right (assuming you're righty). This should be your position when you hit your forehand. Now bring the racquet around the front of your body in an arc to your left side without changing grips with your arm still out-stretched. The opposite side of the racquet face is now facing the net. It's not really possible to hit a backhand with this opposite side of the racquet without a grip change. So to hit with the same side of the racquet face as your forehand, you need to rotate your wrist 180 degrees to get the same face of the racquet in the right position. All this without changing grips or releasing your grip. When you rotate your wrist 180 degrees, the top edge of the racquet that is perpendicular to the ground on your forehand is now the bottom edge.
This is a dead topic Habib that is not worth your time anymore.
Yet, they've all rejected this technique as being ineffective. Why?
Stand facing the net, now hold your racquet in a Western FH grip and stretch your arm out to your right (assuming you're righty). This should be your position when you hit your forehand. Now bring the racquet around the front of your body in an arc to your left side without changing grips with your arm still out-stretched. The opposite side of the racquet face is now facing the net. It's not really possible to hit a backhand with this opposite side of the racquet without a grip change. So to hit with the same side of the racquet face as your forehand, you need to rotate your wrist 180 degrees to get the same face of the racquet in the right position. All this without changing grips or releasing your grip. When you rotate your wrist 180 degrees, the top edge of the racquet that is perpendicular to the ground on your forehand is now the bottom edge.
[ GTR ];1590632 said:BREAKPOINT IS WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!
put the clip on youtube ffs
That would mean Federer is hitting with the OPPOSITE sides of his racquet. When you hit with the opposite sides of the racquet, the same edge of the head points up on both FH and BH, so the logo should always be pointing the same way.erm, federer hits with the same of the strings on forehands and backhands. check out slow motion vids of him on youtube. the pointy tips of the wilson logo always points up when he hits the ball.
Is it proper to hit both your forehands and backhands using the same side (face) of your racquet?
Meaning that instead of using both sides of the stringbed, one side for forehands and the other side for backhands, you instead rotate your wrist, thereby the racquet, 180 degrees so that the top edge of your racquet that is perpendicular to the ground in now the bottom edge, and use the same side of the racquet for both your forehands and backhands without ever changing your grip.
Is that the proper way to play tennis or is it the wrong way? Does anyone even teach people to play this way? How come no good players (6.0+) play this way?
TennisandMusic,
I know it's just a very short clip and just a few strokes, but from the looks of it, it doesn't appear that either your FH nor BH look very penetrating to me. BTW, what level do you play at?
BTW, do you ever hit a slice BH or slice FH? I don't think it's really possible with the way you hit the ball, so you might be losing a lot of variety in your game. FYI, I hit a screaming crosscourt slice forehand passing shot against a very good player today.
And, yes, your strokes don't look as bad because you DO change grips. It looks much worse with the guys that DO NOT change grips at all.
Amone,
Same question for you on the slice FH and BH and do you change grips at all or use the exact same grip (never releasing your grip)?
BTW, do you ever hit a slice BH or slice FH? I don't think it's really possible with the way you hit the ball, so you might be losing a lot of variety in your game.
TennisandMusic, your strokes look fine. Certainly there is nothing in either of your strokes that in any way relates to your grip change.And, yes, your strokes don't look as bad because you DO change grips. It looks much worse with the guys that DO NOT change grips at all.
That would mean Federer is hitting with the OPPOSITE sides of his racquet. When you hit with the opposite sides of the racquet, the same edge of the head points up on both FH and BH, so the logo should always be pointing the same way.
If you hit with only one side of your stringbed, you have the flip the racquet upside down, meaning the top side edge now becomes the bottom side edge, when going from FH to BH or vise versa. Thus, the logo would go from pointing up to pointing down every time your flipped the racquet over.
Perhaps you don't watch as many of Federer's matches as I do but I've seen him hit forehand slices quite often.Oh - screaming FH slice winners? The pros don't use that shot thesedays, well, hardly at all anyways, so surely you'd ditch that shot? (Please: you're honestly coming into this thread, and saying you do something and thus others should, after spending half of this thread saying that we should model of the pros. Please indeed.)
Fine, I'll admit that some pros have their unique idiosyncrosies. However, no pros use the same side of their racquets. None. There must be a good reason, especially when so many pros today used Western grips.Pros are pros for a reason =p, however, many of them don't do "proper" things. So using current pros as a guide for proper form is bad.
However, look back a long time ago and you can see "proper" form. The current form has a lot of different things so there isn't a real proper form since there are different stances now, different forehands, different setups etc.
Roger Federer being an example does a lot of things that are considered improper. Rafael Nadal another example of doing things considered improper. Justine another example of doing things improper. There's a whole list heh.
Fine, I'll admit that some pros have their unique idiosyncrosies. However, no pros use the same side of their racquets. None. There must be a good reason, especially when so many pros today used Western grips.