Capablanca was too lazy to be my favourite. He was a brilliant and efficient natural but he lacked a sort of drive to truly seek perfection. I think Fischer really tried for it but he was a nutter.
Capablanca lacked a curiosity for the game that captured the likes of Botvinnik, Fischer and Kasparov. Maybe it was too easy for Capa, as he was such an effortless player - of course all those top level players weren't truly effortless but I mean by comparison, like Federer to Nadal.
Also, sometimes the tweener is the more efficient choice.