Low Flex Rating AND Big Powerful Shots??

mnttlrg

Professional
So there is something that has baffled me for years:

I have hit with lots of lower flex rating rackets that are a complete noodle.... meaning even when I generate a large amount of force on the swing, it still hits weak garbage. This includes a few of the popular new models and plenty of older rackets, too.

On the other hand, I have also hit with new and old models of 60ish flex rackets that have given me quite a bit of power, at times seemingly more power on certain shots than I'd get from most stiffer rackets. I know lots of pros hit with flexy setups like this. I know these setups aren't for everyone and require a lot of force to be generated by the player, but I have tried a few setups lately that offer a nice menu of benefits for my game without sacrificing much in terms of putaway power.

I can't figure out why I get one extreme with one racket, and the opposite extreme with another. Is there any rhyme or reason to why that happens with these types of rackets? I don't usually see that big of differences amongst the stiffer frames.

How much of a factor is the right string? What do you consider the right string setup for low flex?

Which rackets have you tried that felt like they had big beefy power (in particular relative to the specs), and/or which ones were unplayably- weak noodle rackets?

For any of you that have been on this same journey, please share your wisdom. Thanks!
 
Last edited:

aarenes

Rookie
Prince Tour Exo3 100. Very nice controllable power from all wings of the court. This is when I started respecting low flex but heavier racquets

it's flex rating was something like 52 strung on a 19-20mm beam. I had purchased used from a college club player and it was leaded up (before I knew such customizations exists).

i think for any such racquet, it all depends on how much mass is in the top part of the frame that hits the ball...
- if there is a decent amount, big thwack!!!!!
- if not, think 6-9 points HL, underwhelming response
 

mnttlrg

Professional
i think for any such racquet, it all depends on how much mass is in the top part of the frame that hits the ball...
It definitely seems like the distribution of weight throughout the frame is a huge factor. I think something that has problems with twisting or buckling in any way can be a huge issue, along with the right amount of top frame mass.

I think this stuff is important to any racket, but it seems like an even bigger concern for a racket that likes to flex.
 

Djinn

Rookie
I think you are looking at one variable (flex) of an equation that has multiple variables (weight, balance, beam width, twist weight, and most importantly swing weight). If you are getting more power from one racquet with 60 flex than another racquet with 60 flex, I'm willing to bet the one with more power has a higher swing weight.

The notion that flexible racquets lack power is not entirely correct IMO. Of course you lose power with a more flexible frame and gain feel, but that power can be regained with a higher swing weight (provided you can handle it). Also, don't just listen to others on the forums who claim a 320 swing weight is too high for recreational players, and 340+ is impossible unless you are a pro. Try it out for yourself.
 

Arjuntino

Rookie
People mentioned several factors. Also headsize/trampoline, tension, string type, dwell time.

And there will be an impact on the reflection of someone else's power vs generating your own too.
 

Sintherius

Semi-Pro
Angell TC95 16x19 63 RA is an absolute rocket launcher in the best way. Has a very open string pattern and can just hammer the ball, flat or topspin.
 
Top