Obviously the four main Grand Slam events are the pinnacle of the sport of tennis. However, how would you compare a Master's Cup win to a Grand Slam title?
I think most people hold a Grand Slam title in higher esteem, however one could argue that winning the Master's Cup is perhaps a bit tougher. Just to get to the final...blake had to beat Nadal, Davydenko, and Nalbandian. You look at a guy like Roddick and how he made it to the US Open final. I don't think he even played anyone in the top 10 until facing Federer. The Grand Slam though is physically more taxing with the five set matches.
I think most people hold a Grand Slam title in higher esteem, however one could argue that winning the Master's Cup is perhaps a bit tougher. Just to get to the final...blake had to beat Nadal, Davydenko, and Nalbandian. You look at a guy like Roddick and how he made it to the US Open final. I don't think he even played anyone in the top 10 until facing Federer. The Grand Slam though is physically more taxing with the five set matches.