buut he threw his racquet into the stands at the olympics!!!Meddy is awesome to watch. I hope Djokovic wins the CYGS but if he doesn’t then I want Meddy to win. He’s box office.
Djokovic and Medvedev are both box office. We love to see it and on court drama.buut he threw his racquet into the stands at the olympics!!!
This is great
Only guy I like from the Next Gen, really want him to start winning big tournaments
This comment was made elsewhere:
"Yes Medvedev talked during the point but Bublik hit the ball before Medvedev said sorry and by rule that is not classed as a hinderance!"
He has a good point.
If Med had talked anytime before Bublik had hit the ball back, that certainly could be called a hindrance.
But after Bublik hit the ball, there was nothing that Med could say given the ball's trajectory, to hinder Bublik.
After Bublik hit the ball, he was dead in the water. Med either smashes the ball in the stands, dinks it over the net, or misses it.
Bublik was NEVER going to touch the ball again during that point.
No way bro. Med lacks talent, weapons and a big game. He will NEVER win a slam.Meddy is awesome to watch. I hope Djokovic wins the CYGS but if he doesn’t then I want Meddy to win. He’s box office.
No way bro. Med lacks talent, weapons and a big game. He will NEVER win a slam.
Moron talked during a point. What was she supposed to do, applaud?It was a pretty dumb call, don't get the umpire's logic here.
Moron talked during a point. What was she supposed to do, applaud?
I understand.It wasn't a hindrance, the opponent was on the ground and had no ball to hit to be hindered.
Med's only mistake was not apologizing after the point was over completely.
I understand.
But you do not talk until the point is over. If you do, you lose it. There are no exceptions for instances where the opponent is flat on their arse.
I understand.
But you do not talk until the point is over. If you do, you lose it. There are no exceptions for instances where the opponent is flat on their arse.
I apologise, but I do not speak triple question mark.No you don't understand. Then you HAVE TO give warning/penalty for time Violation every time player goes over the clock.
How many times that happens? Let alone others, how many times did this umpire went by the book in that case???
Medvedev is the champion we deserve, but not the champion we need rn.
Or Nadal's existence.It is a travesty that an umpire can call this a hindrance but yet they never call Sonego's or Sabalenka's delayed and prolonged grunts a hindrance!
E V O L U T I O NLets talk after any of these pathetic next genners start winning BO5 slams...otherwise this is charity/playing for scraps because Djokodal don't even care about Masters anymore.
E V O L U T I O N
Medvedev is Kyrgios done right
D E V O L U T I O NEvolving.............but backwards
What's especially dumb is if someone in the same situation let out even a fairly short grunt hitting that overhead, they would likely still be making noise by the time Bublik hit the ball, but I guarantee you they wouldn't be called for a hindrance. But Med saying sorry after Bublik's already struck the ball is apparently out of bounds.It was a pretty dumb call, don't get the umpire's logic here.
Djoker and Mad Lad create zero drama compared to this guy. Do you love to see him? I would guess the answer is "no." Only about 6 of us on TTW are Nick fans, a very small percentage.Djokovic and Medvedev are both box office. We love to see it and on court drama.
Nadal is close to done. There’s only Djokovic left now. Next gen are very close to taking over.Lets talk after any of these pathetic next genners start winning BO5 slams...otherwise this is charity/playing for scraps because Djokodal don't even care about Masters anymore.
Nadal is close to done. There’s only Djokovic left now. Next gen are very close to taking over.
Well it’s there time to shine now. Better get used to it. I hope Medvedev wins a slam soon as he’s one of my favourites from next gen. I don’t mind Zverev either. Ideally I want Djokovic to win more but one more will do to get him on 21 then if next gen take over I’ll be cool with that hahaWell can we really call it "taking over" at this point?
Bublik thought it was a ridiculous call.I apologise, but I do not speak triple question mark.
You seem to have watched the match, though. I went to sleep after the first set.
Did Bublik keep the point once he gained knowledge of what had actually happened?
First of all the ball did not hit Bublik, it hit his racket.Did he say sorry before the ball hit Bublik or after
It sounds like its after, and ball hitting him is when the point is over
Don't think ref realized the ball bounced off Bublik back?
I just watched the replay in slow motion. The ball definitely hit Bub's racket. It was a freak shot, to be able to hit the ball and have it go over the net!Didn´t anyone realized that the ball hit Bublik´s body, not his racquet? That´s why the situation is hillarious.
Hasn't quite worked out this year.Nadal is close to done. There’s only Djokovic left now. Next gen are very close to taking over.
Thank you. That is what a sportsman acts like.Bublik thought it was a ridiculous call.
I don't even think he heard Med say anything.
Bublik was surprised when the umpire gave him the point.
He didn't understand why !!!
In the middle of the incident he asked the umpire for the score and was ready to replay the point
instead of get the point!
I do not know how hard your abs are, but mine do not deflect the ball 10m and over the net.Didn´t anyone realized that the ball hit Bublik´s body, not his racquet? That´s why the situation is hillarious.