Hawkeye gets exposed on clay. I’ve seen where Hawkeye makes a call, and the camera zooms in on the mark and Hawkeye is wrong. The other line-calling software, which has both the line animation and video of the ball actually hitting the surface is superior.
You cannot be serious!
It's not they necessarily believe it. Human errors can often be interpreted as some type of intentional bias. If it's just a machine glitch, the players would take it as being unlucky rather than being unfairly treated.Yes, Hawkeye's technology is seriously flawed. But the players believe in it, so I guess it's a good thing if using it keeps them calm/collected with the calls.
Only a couple of days in to the clay season and already we're getting players massively wound up by obvious and stupid mistakes. Just put hawk-eye or whatever version of the new tech is called on clay. Enough of this ridiculous umpire checking the mark, it ALWAYS causes drama and issues and debates. Medvedev was right both times here, maybe he went a lil overboard with what he said but he was still right
Yes.Just to be clear. Did he get both points and still act like that?
How many TIMES?How many times is this going to have to happen before you all start believing me?
How many times. This is a 28 year old man, a father at that. Literally, 3 year olds possess more discipline, manners, and self control than this piece of work.
Banging your head on the wall. Imagine how I feel now trying to convince you Kane is rubbish.How many times is this going to have to happen before you all start believing me?
How many times. This is a 28 year old man, a father at that. Literally, 3 year olds possess more discipline, manners, and self control than this piece of work.
Hawkeye gets exposed on clay. I’ve seen where Hawkeye makes a call, and the camera zooms in on the mark and Hawkeye is wrong. The other line-calling software, which has both the line animation and video of the ball actually hitting the surface is superior.
If you’re talking the second set on serve 1-2 30-0. He did not get that point even though it was :Wait Medvedev got both points and he was still cursing the judges out and yelling like a brat??? He should be kicked out of the tournament and penalized.
The 30-0 ball that was called “out” ended up being in yet med hit a forehand winner off that ball and lost the point lol. How?He completely lost it lol. And I didn't hear a single warning from Lahyani.
He lost a game he technically won. It’s the second week in a row a chair umpire awards the point to the guy who lost the point. Unacceptable.So he seemed fine with the very unfair first call. They should have at least replayed the point. But then he has a tantrum about a non call that was overruled in his favor. Honestly tennis has put up with brats like this for far too long and it is a reason I can rarely stand to watch it.
What an idiot. He’s playing old man Monfils who’s been around since the PlayStation 2 playing and he’s whining about this
Hope someone bagels him and puts him out of his misery. I’m sick of watching him in finals He’s a scrub player. I don’t know how he makes all these finals. He isn’t even that good. He has zero weapons off the ground
He completely lost it lol. And I didn't hear a single warning from Lahyani.
I've seen this too where they show the actual view of the super slow motion and it's got calls wrong. I remember one rafa challenged and hawkeye said he still lost the point wen they showed the reply but it was obvious seeing the super slow motion that he was right. I like the line calls being like they are on clay. not perfect either but more interesting than having bots call the lines.Hawkeye gets exposed on clay. I’ve seen where Hawkeye makes a call, and the camera zooms in on the mark and Hawkeye is wrong. The other line-calling software, which has both the line animation and video of the ball actually hitting the surface is superior.
BS Russian
There are thousands of ball marks on hard courts. How do you know which one was made by the shot in question?Hawkeye gets exposed on clay. I’ve seen where Hawkeye makes a call, and the camera zooms in on the mark and Hawkeye is wrong.
Just to be clear. Did he get both points and still act like that?
Med was not given the 30-0 point. It should have been 40-0, but Lahyani calls it 30-15.Yes.
Hawkeye gets exposed on clay. I’ve seen where Hawkeye makes a call, and the camera zooms in on the mark and Hawkeye is wrong. The other line-calling software, which has both the line animation and video of the ball actually hitting the surface is superior.
To me, a player shouldn't talk like that to the officials. I would have issued a code violation. I'm a fan of Medvedev, to a point, but I can't imagine Edberg, Sampras, Nadal, Federer, and a host of others behaving like this. I can't even imagine Alcaraz or Sinner doing it. Tennis should get tough on on-court tirades from players; it's not a good look for the sport.
The 30-0 ball that was called “out” ended up being in yet med hit a forehand winner off that ball and lost the point lol. How?
It's not clear from the video, but did the linesperson call it out, or was it Med himself?Med serving 30-0. Ball hits near the line and Med plays it and hits a winner.
Med should be up 40-0 if ball was called out. Med should be up 40-0 if ball was called IN.
Either way Med should be up 40-0.... How is the score 30-15???
It's not clear from the video, but did the linesperson call it out, or was it Med himself?
If Med called it out, then he's stopping the point and if he's wrong (or if the umpire believes he is wrong) the point automatically goes to Monfils
If the linesperson called it out but it Lahyani overruled it, then the point should have been replayed
I watched the match. Did not appear to be home who called it out as he was clearly frustrated with the lines person who missed a call the next point.Somebody clearly yells "Out!" but not clear if it is Med or linesman.
Usually a player will stop playing on a ball he thinks is out. Here Med keeps playing and hits a winner.
In general. it is best if player keeps playing until he hears an out call.
In the case of challenge I think the rule is that player must immediately stop playing (don't agree with that rule)...
But it does not appear Med was challenging any call here...
Announcer appears to say, "Shame for Med. Ball was called out but he hit a winner". That implies Med himself called it out.
I don’t agree with the language and tone med used either. But he technically won a game he lost at the end of it. And I get the frustration bc even Monfils was confused why he got the point at 30-15. (Shame on Monfils for taking it btw).To me, a player shouldn't talk like that to the officials. I would have issued a code violation. I'm a fan of Medvedev, to a point, but I can't imagine Edberg, Sampras, Nadal, Federer, and a host of others behaving like this. I can't even imagine Alcaraz or Sinner doing it. Tennis should get tough on on-court tirades from players; it's not a good look for the sport.
I don’t agree with the language and tone med used either. But he technically won a game he lost at the end of it. And I get the frustration bc even Monfils was confused why he got the point at 30-15. (Shame on Monfils for taking it btw).
Chair umpire needed oversight. He was clearly wrong in the end. And didn’t correct it.
Wasn't his fault. The whole situation was extremely confusing. Seemed like Medvedev himself didn't realize he made the winner. I remember Djokovic giving the point to Shapovalov in Shanghai because he didn't realize his ball was in. Players have to be focused on themselves and there's rarely a time you can blame them (Garin being the obvious example of being a complete POS).Kinda low on Monfils part not to and taking it.