My official review of Wilson Trance All court

goober

Legend
WTACMWN.JPG


Here are my thoughts on the play-test shoes that TW sent me. I want to thank them for giving me the opportunity to test shoes for them.


My foot type: Medium width prefer slightly wide in fore foot. Over
pronator and toe dragger.

Past favorite shoes:
1. Matchday: Adidas barricade II, Nike BFII 2. Practice: Adidas BIV, Nike Air Resolve plus

Testing conditions: Hardcourts, doubles and singles, competitive and social, 10+ hours

Style: Wilson shoes have always tended towards conservative styles and this shoe is no different. While having little more color than the prior Prostaff line, if you want to turn people's heads or have them notice your new stylish shoes, this won't do it. The shoe materials itself are rather unusual in that the hindfoot is mesh except at the Achilles area. The forefoot is leather and mid-foot is plastic with a Wilson logo. Usually mesh is put in either forefoot or mid-foot.

Traction: The Trance's have a deep herringbone pattern. I like this type of pattern and I had excellent traction on hard courts with no slippage.

Comfort: There is a definite break in period with these shoes. I wore them around for two days before playing in them. After a couple times playing the shoes felt broken in. The leather however is not super soft leather so it is still a little stiff.

As far as cushioning- this shoe is I would say at best average. The forefoot cushioning was particularly deficient. I wore some level 3 thorlos which seemed to help. I think the culprit though is the removable insole. It is very thin. Toward the end of the test period I replaced it with a Spenco insole and the cushioning was considerably improved. Of course this did add to the overall weight. The heel cushioning with the DST foam on the other hand seemed quite adequate if not plush.

Fit: The fit for my foot type was perfect. I think those who wear a D or E width would be happy. The length was true to size.

Flexpoint: Towards the toe of the shoe. (This is for AndrewD) :)

Weight: The listed weight on TW for size 10.5 is 14.9 oz. This feels slightly lower than I would have guessed. While the shoe definitely feels lighter than prior models such as Prostaff series, it is rather clunky so you don't feel like you are flying around the court.

Stability: I felt this was a very stable shoe. Hard cuts, change of directions, it took everything I threw at it. There was very little slippage and no feeling that I may roll my ankle. I always felt like I was on a firm foundation.

Arch Support: I have low arches and felt no discomfort.

Durability: While I think I can't give a good assessment on durability with such a short testing period, there was no premature wear. I certainly have noticed other shoes that started balding after 10 hours of play, but this showed very little if any wear. There is also a beefed up toe guard which I liked because of my toe dragging.

SUMMARY

Likes: Stability, traction and overall solid feeling.

Dislikes: Average cushioning in forefoot- I felt this was alleviated with aftermarket insoles. Clunky feeling despite relative low weight.

Overall Impressions: Wilson in my mind has tended to be favored by players who wanted nonflashy stable, solid shoes. They have ventured into the performance oriented shoes recently with their Open and Tour models. The results appear mixed from this foray based on personal observation and comments of others on those two models. The Trance appears to be an attempt to go back to the traditional Wilson model of shoe with some concession towards a lighter shoe. I would say it is comparable to the Wilson Prostaff Elite in a slightly lighter package. Club players who like the prostaff series will be happy with this model. Club and tourney players that want gameday performance shoes with some pizazz probably will not switch over to this shoe. I personally thought the shoe overall is a good addition to the Wilson line and I will use this shoe for doubles and practice sessions in singles.
 
Last edited:

Sixpointone

Professional
What an excellent and in depth review! Thanks for sharing Goober and in my opinion that review clearly reflects why you were chosen to review the product.
 

bertrevert

Legend
The insoles in many tennis and running shoes beggars belief.

They honestly think the wafer-thin piece is enough?

I guess they concentrate all their energies into the shoe and feel that the insole should do nothing much more than absorb sweat.

It's a neat idea but does it fit the reality? I have to use the Aust equivalent insole called Sorbothane to improve cushioning - and I play on comparitively soft artificial grass!

Great review. Did you find the mesh in the back half of the shoe did not provide enough support?
 

AndrewD

Legend
Goober,

Greatly appreciated, thanks very much. Pity the 'out-of-the-box' cushioning wasn't better and the feel a bit 'clunky' as the flex-point is quite ideal for me.

Can I ask what shoes are you currently using (or are they the ones listed in your 'past favourites' ?
 

goober

Legend
Great review. Did you find the mesh in the back half of the shoe did not provide enough support?

The mesh in the back of the shoe did seem to provide enough support. The midfoot is plastic which is fairly rigid and there is leather in the achilles area. I still think it is an unusual design, and probably mostly done to increase breathability and bring down the weight.
 

goober

Legend
Goober,

Greatly appreciated, thanks very much. Pity the 'out-of-the-box' cushioning wasn't better and the feel a bit 'clunky' as the flex-point is quite ideal for me.

Can I ask what shoes are you currently using (or are they the ones listed in your 'past favourites' ?

My current shoe rotation- Nike air resolve plus, Adidas BIV, Yonex SHT 304 and NB 1002. I tend to try a variety of shoes in addition to keeping a few known favorites always on hand. :D
 

bertrevert

Legend
Previously I had some Wilson ProStaff Elite they were the 'E' variety, which turned out to be too wide and teh toe area basically ripped apart. Would you say these are 'E' wide or smaller than that?

The mesh must be very cooling at the back, might be good in the higher temps.

Is this shoe more MID than low cut, or does it feel more low cut?
 

AndrewD

Legend
My current shoe rotation- Nike air resolve plus, Adidas BIV, Yonex SHT 304 and NB 1002. I tend to try a variety of shoes in addition to keeping a few known favorites always on hand. :D

Thanks. I shy away from Nike as they generally don't have a very good flex point and tend towards a narrow fit in the toe (I'm surprised they fit with you being wider in the forefoot). New Balance I veto completely as they were the shoes that gave me Plantar Fasciitus in the first place (NB653). How do you find the Yonex (is it just me or does everyone think that was a bad choice of initials?) ?

Is your review for the message board only, or will it also be posted on the main site (as they do with the racquet Independent Playtester Comparisons) ?
 

goober

Legend
Thanks. I shy away from Nike as they generally don't have a very good flex point and tend towards a narrow fit in the toe (I'm surprised they fit with you being wider in the forefoot). New Balance I veto completely as they were the shoes that gave me Plantar Fasciitus in the first place (NB653). How do you find the Yonex (is it just me or does everyone think that was a bad choice of initials?) ?

Is your review for the message board only, or will it also be posted on the main site (as they do with the racquet Independent Playtester Comparisons) ?

The Air Resolves are not like other Nike shoes and are wide in the forefoot.

Yonex SHT 304 have a following on this board. Briefly the pluses are light and cushioned. Minuses: traction and stability- not bad but average. A lot of people disagree, but I don't see myself buying Yonex shoes unless they make a very different model.

I don't think know if my review will be posted on the main sight. There are actually a bunch of other people who were suppose to write reviews and I think it will be just a message forum thing to get people talking about the shoe.
 

AndrewD

Legend
Goober,

Thanks again. If the reviews aren't posted on the main site it will be a genuine shame. A lot of people who use the retail site don't use the message board but I'm sure they'd appreciate the extra information.
 

goober

Legend
Since Drakulie gave his 10 month update, I thought I would as well.

I am still using these shoes! Of course I have a 4 shoe rotation, but nonetheless the durability is definitely up there with other shoes that are known as durable. My opinions on the shoe haven't changed but I thought I would say they could improve the shoe cushioning considerably by beefing up the insole.

If I had to rate them compared to other Wilsons I have tried:
Trance>Opens> Prostaff Elite> Prostaff Classic.


Unfortunately they won't displace my barricades. If TW needs playtesting on the Barricade VI- I'm so there- :cool:
 

drakulie

Talk Tennis Guru
^^Nice, thanks for your update. I wonder if jolly, kk, and the others are still using them???

I'm playing more on hard courts recently, and the traction on them is awesome. No rolling over, stop-and go, and changing directions is awesome.
 
Top