Yes, i mean the spins are forwards spin.Those are half volleys.
Typically one volleys with conti grip, the footage is fuzzy but I assume he's using a conti grip for those half volleys. You can generate some spin with a conti grip but it's nowhere near what he does with his regular forehand.My question is the grip.
I use for my fh volley and dropshot reply aussie grip too but always with backspin.Nadal might be using Aussie grip for his FH dropshots, volleys, etc. I’d say it’s a “conti grip ballpark” different to pronounced FH drive grips - from strong Eastern and further on for current pro players.
I can slice with aussie grip, but forward spin just make me wonder...If the ball is close to the net and low, then you may want to use a continental grip for groundstrokes as well as the volley. I use a Continental grip for groundstrokes about two thirds from the net to the service line unless it's a high sitter. But I started with a Continental, went to the Eastern later on an went to the Semi-Western even later on. So I can hit with all three, depending on the situation.
I can slice with aussie grip, but forward spin just make me wonder...
Sure, but when i tried it, for me was it an ,,impossible to play with".Rod Laver and the Aussies of old used the Continental grip for everything including forehand topspin.
For dropshot reply could one hit the ball only infront(?).Lots of oldtime topspinners used conti grip AFTER the ball bounces.
EASY, if you close your shoulders and take the ball late.
Plenty of good players can topspin low half volleys, but few to none add topspin to non bounce volleys.
I mean opponents incoming dropshot, than my forehand aussie grip reply, like in the video.Drop shot is hit with SLICE.
And late contact point.
Continental grip is the best. I use it for everything except the forehand drive. It can be done. But there’s a reason why no one hits like that anymore. However the clips in the video are all half volleys. Doesn’t really count.Rod Laver and the Aussies of old used the Continental grip for everything including forehand topspin.
It’s still SW. But one photo doesn’t prove anything. Most people adjust their grip on each shot.Nadal's forehand grip does not seem to be as western as what people say, IMHO.
It’s still SW. But one photo doesn’t prove anything. Most people adjust their grip on each shot.
Maybe. But again maybe that photo is the 5% where isn’t fully W?It has to be very mild SW, IMHO, looking at the angle of laid back wrist.
Adjusting means he does not have extreme grips that people have been assuming for many years.
Late contact point is stronly adviced, however by dropshot reply it is unpossible (see the Nadal video).
I changed the grip from the eastern to the conti. I dont get it why the fuss is all about the wrist lag. Everytime, i hit the crosscourt foehand using the wrist lag, they stillmcatch the ball.
So i used conti grip, and crushed the ball and they couldnt catch the ball without wrist lag.
I was using a ps85. Wrist lag works with lighter, oversized racquet like nadal.
It’s a so-so lag... the one that’s technically in, but not that perceived...I lag just fine with an 85 inch racquet, or a 65 inch racquet, Federer did too.
J
It’s a so-so lag... the one that’s technically in, but not that perceived...
What?
No, if you use wrist lag to hit crosscourt for clean winner, it wont be successfully. So i changed it, using conti grip, the ball will be deeper near the baseline, allowing me to chip and charge to the net to shorten the points.I lag just fine with an 85 inch racquet, or a 65 inch racquet, Federer did too.
J
No, if you use wrist lag to hit crosscourt for clean winner, it wont be successfully. So i changed it, using conti grip, the ball will be deeper near the baseline, allowing me to chip and charge to the net to shorten the points.
Nadal might be using Aussie grip for his FH dropshots, volleys, etc. I’d say it’s a “conti grip ballpark” different to pronounced FH drive grips - from strong Eastern and further on for current pro players.
Inbetween conti and eastern FHWhat is aussie grip?
Inbetween conti and eastern FH
The same way Roger uses in between eastern and semi-western on his FHHow could there be a grip between those two?
How could there be a grip between those two?
Put your knuckle on the ridge between the bevels.
J
The same way Roger uses in between eastern and semi-western on his FH
So each mm rotation around the handle we are gonna give a name to now? This is Chas level anal(ysis), functionally it is same as conti so just call it conti. Not you personally Jolly, but in general, why does this forum go into so much detail on irrelevant ****?
No he plays eastern in a pistol grip.
I just say "here hold the racquet like this." Then if they change the grip I whack their knuckles with a ruler.
J
No he plays eastern in a pistol grip.