Watching the semifinal against Tsitsipas it has become clear that Nadal doesn't have the endurance/stamina like he use to in his heyday. He couldn't keep up running down every ball anymore, and many times he just quit on it and conceded the point. It wasn't that Tsitsipas was hitting right through him from the baseline, but Nadal doesn't have the legs and energy to keep running for 5 sets. In his 20s, he was the master at sustaining long rally consistently, and breakdown his opponent physically, but in this match it was the opposite, the younger Tsitsipas who outlasted him physically.
In the first 2 sets, Nadal had 10 UFEs, but in the next 3 sets, he had 33. 43 overall
Tsitsipas had twice as much UFEs as Nadal in the first 2 sets, but cut down to 18 in the next 3 sets. 38 overall
Points won: medium rallies(5-8 strokes), points are even at 27 each
Points won: long rallies(9+ strokes), Tsitsipas wins 33 points, Nadal 27
A young Nadal would beat Tsitsipas because his fitness and durability wouldn't have betrayed him.
For some of you who still think age isn't a factor in a very demanding sport like tennis, just watch the match and see for yourself.
In the first 2 sets, Nadal had 10 UFEs, but in the next 3 sets, he had 33. 43 overall
Tsitsipas had twice as much UFEs as Nadal in the first 2 sets, but cut down to 18 in the next 3 sets. 38 overall
Points won: medium rallies(5-8 strokes), points are even at 27 each
Points won: long rallies(9+ strokes), Tsitsipas wins 33 points, Nadal 27
A young Nadal would beat Tsitsipas because his fitness and durability wouldn't have betrayed him.
For some of you who still think age isn't a factor in a very demanding sport like tennis, just watch the match and see for yourself.
Last edited: