Sir Percival Blakeney
Professional
No they have been the wise and dominant force on these pages for YEARS.
the murray/djoker nuthuggers are more recent.
Well excuuuse me, princess.
No they have been the wise and dominant force on these pages for YEARS.
the murray/djoker nuthuggers are more recent.
Sampras would be lucky to make the SF at Roland Garros in any era.I don't know about 3 but Pete would definitely win 1.. Maybe 2 (with a good draw) if 92-96 Sampras was playing today
#PTL #JC4Ever
#AngieB
nearly..1 of every 4.. learn maths dude...
Well excuuuse me, princess.
Silly argument. I wasn't writing about raw talent. Today's game is different: The physicality is brutal--the surface speed has changed.
Take the top ten. Were the average first serve speeds higher in the 80s and 90s? Could the players run for hours and hours?
Again, I was not talking about raw tennis talent. THAT is not rewarded much anymore except at the very very top. I agree with you about this aspect. But it may simply be a function of the racquets, strings, and court surfaces. These all conspire to produce a certain type of tennis which does not necessarily reward true tennis talent like it used to..
I think that Federer, in particular, would have fared better in a different era. The big four are winning DESPITE the changes mentioned above. Otherwise, I think that the players of the 80s and 90s would fold, physically.
Look at average height? Still rolling your eyes...
Bring on Eddie Dibbs and Harold Solomon. They would rule (now I roll MY eyes...)
Typical newbie response to fact.
When you finally remove your thumb from your @$$ you might learn something and become less boring and predictable.
Typical newbie response to fact.
When you finally remove your thumb from your @$$ you might learn something and become less boring and predictable.
He is 23 and 8 this year. Basically losing 1 out of every three matches he plays.
23-8? Wow, didn't know that...
Nadal cares - but there's not much he can do. He has one game - and the locker room has figured it out.
His body language throughout the second set and especially at the tail end of it (those last two points) was not the usual from Rafa at all.
23-8? Wow, didn't know that...
He's already lost more matches than he did in the whole of 2013! :shock:
nearly..1 of every 4.. learn maths dude...
Or maybe it was a nervous smile. I think he was a bit embarrassed by his perf in front of his home crowd
Or maybe it was a nervous smile. I think he was a bit embarrassed by his perf in front of his home crowd
He was probably smiling because he was pleased with a runner-up, 1) because he has struggled a bit this year by his standards and 2) he understands how difficult it is to win at this level or even get to a final. Unlike the typical TT poster/fan, he knows he had a good week and he doesn't take things for granted.
And he played with his old racket right? So it's not a change of racket issue.I have always felt Rafa sort of played a safe game. But now looking at how he is shanking so badly it shows how precise and well timed his strokes need to be.
nearly..1 of every 4.. learn maths dude...
LOL. Ummmmm I don't know what to say on this dude. I hope you were drunk when you typed this.:shock: I am kind embarrassed for ya.:?
1 loss out of 4 is 1 loss and 3 wins. Now multiply 1 and 3 by 8. 8 losses and 24 wins would be 1 loss every 4 matches...
And he played with his old racket right? So it's not a change of racket issue.
What I find ominous is that he couldn't put up a fight in this final. He was completely fresh, hadn't had a tough semi, hadn't played late, had lost early in Barcelona. So he should have had plenty in the tank to make the match close even if the win eluded him.
But he COULD not.
That is not a matchup issue like it was vs Djoko in 2011, and not a case of exhaustion like it was vs Fed in the 2009 final (because he had played a marathon semi vs Djoko the day before). That's a case of "Shankdal is in the house", same way it started with Fed-error.
That's a case of "the writing is on the wall" and I don't like it.
The one positive I see is that he made final. So he limited the points bleeding. And it's an upgrade from the hard season when he could not even reach semis.
I don't see why he should care about more master titles. Like I said, does it improve his legacy at all? Or do slams at this point?
Most people don't even give a crap about masters count. Its an overlooked "record"
As long as he is playing well come slam time he puts himself in a position to win more which is the most important thing
What? 23-8 is 1 of every 4?
Well I don't know. But I do know that I have totally underestimated the timing and precision that he needs to win. I always kind of felt he was sort of a pickup and Fed was a sports car. Maybe in some ways he was but in the past he could rely on his wheels to get him points. One thing I have noticed and you are pretty objective is that if you are willing and able to get in long rallies with Rafa at this stage in his career you will most likely win.
He has the masters record.. Why care about that anymore? Its all about winning 3-4 more slams
Nothing else matters for Rafa.
Sad, but true. Rafa will end up missing or going for too much.
Did you get a bad trip during the match from your bowl that gave you this epiphany?
I'm been saying this for months.
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA....You're so funny :lol:
these "trophies" ? just glass and metal... why should i care about this stuff, man ?!
hombre... rafastarianism is beyond all this material crap, it's all about winning morally and socially, no ?
He was smiling after todays defeat. He is behaving like he knows that he came to the end of the road as far as career concern. All he is trying to do right now is retire like Sampras. Sadly he wont reach the final in RG this year and Roger will not wait for him in the final as well like Agassi did 2002 Us Open final.
It's amazing how profound your hatred of Federer is, that you're actually willing to watch Nadal pass Sampras in slam tally only so that you can gloat here and throw dirt at Federer. I sometimes have to wonder if you really are a Pete fan. Because I never really understood the Pete fans who now root for Nadal. They're not even remotely alike and most importantly, Roger and Pete are actually a lot closer.
I hope you realize, the more players pass Sampras, the more he loses relevance in minds of the upcoming generations of both, players and fans. Federer is actually kind enough to remind everyone on and off about how great Pete was. Nadal is just oblivious. But of course as long as you have a proverbial revenge over Federer for passing Pete, anything goes right?